We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Obesity in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities) occurs at twice the frequency as their typically developing peers. Typically developing adolescents with obesity have abnormal cardiac function (as measured by strain echocardiography) and cardiac mass, but the effects of obesity on cardiac health in adolescents with Down syndrome or autism spectrum disorder are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index on cardiac function in adolescents with Down syndrome or autism.
Methods:
Adolescents (age 12–21 years) with Down syndrome (n = 28), autism (n = 33), and age-/sex-matched typically developing controls (n = 15) received an echocardiogram optimised for strain analysis at a single timepoint. Measures of ventricular function, mass, and size were collected. Regression modelling evaluated the impact of body mass index and intellectual and developmental disabilities diagnosis on these cardiac measures.
Results:
In regression modelling, an elevated body mass index z-score was associated with diminished systolic biventricular function by global strain (left ventricular longitudinal strain β 0.87, P < 0.001; left ventricular circumferential strain β 0.57, p 0.003; right ventricular longitudinal strain β 0.63, P < 0.001). Diminished left ventricular diastolic function by early diastolic strain rate was also associated with elevated body mass index (global longitudinal end-diastolic strain rate β −0.7, P < 0.001). No association was found between traditional (non-strain) measures of systolic and diastolic ventricular function and body mass index z-score.
Conclusions:
Obesity in adolescents with Down syndrome or autism negatively impacts cardiac function as measured by echocardiographic strain analysis that was not detected by traditional parameters.
People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) vary in terms of the nature and severity of their disabilities, but for all, their disability is lifelong. They experience of health inequities in the form of higher rates of poor health when compared with the general population. Together with biological factors relating to impairment or genetic factors, adverse social determinants of health contribute to their high rates of comorbid and secondary conditions that account for their poor health. There is a human rights imperative to address their health inequities through broader social change to reduce their socio-economic disadvantages, and systemic changes to healthcare systems to ensure they are afforded the same access to quality care as others in the community. This chapter explores the nature of the health inequities of people with IDD and identifies factors contributing to their poor health. The chapter ends with a review of strategies that show promise in addressing existing health problems, preventing the onset of poor health and improving healthcare systems.
Long perceived as sexually aberrant, persons with disabilities have made headway in recent years breaking down societal and attitudinal barriers that exclude many from leading sexually active lives. This progress has been uneven, often depending on a person’s type of disability. For example, evolving societal attitudes support the equal right of persons with physical disabilities to sexual intimacy, even if the means by which to fulfill this right (e.g., accessible social clubs) remain elusive. By contrast, persons with intellectual disabilities seeking volitional sex still face multitudinous attitudinal barriers.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.