We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Monitoring patient with anorexia nervosa (AN) include clinical, biological and psychological factors. In recent years many researchers criticize the BMI as useful measure for controlling evolution of AN.
Objectives
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is one of the main methods for nutritional status assessment.
Aims
The aim of this study was the assessment of the nutrition status in a group of patients with anorexia nervosa in comparison to healthy population (HP).
Methods
The study involved 37 participants: 21 patients with AN and 16 healthy volunteers constituting the control group (HP). The patients were divided into two groups according a BMI: I group 14 < BMI < 15,5 (n = 11; age 18.0 ± 4.37) and II group: 15,5 < BMI < 17,5 (n = 10; age 17.82 ± 3.68). The mean age of HP was 17.68 ± 1.57 and BMI 20.56 ± 1.16 kg/m2. BIA was performed by using ImpediMed bioimpedance analysis SFB7 BioImp. The parameters: phase angle (PA), TBW%, ECW, ICW, ECW/ICW were analyzed.
Results
PA was decreased significantly in the I (4.5°±0,6) and II group (4.7°±0,6) of AN patients’ in comparison with HP (5.6°±0,7). TBW was 9% higher in I group and ECW was increased 6% in the both AN groups compared with HP (P < 0.01). Additionally ECW/ICW ratio indicated the higher transfer of water into the extracellular compartment in AN group (P < 0.01).
Conclusions
BIA is accurate tool to indicate the valuable indicators of detecting malnutrition in AN. Further studies are needed to validate the significance of these parameters for the full identification of the nutrition status of AN patients’.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.