Objectives: The question addressed here is whether home rehabilitation after stroke is better and/or less
expensive than the more conventional alternatives, i.e., rehabilitation during inpatient care, day
care, and outpatient visits—alone or in combinations appropriate to disease stage and patient
needs. Home rehabilitation is managed by teams of professionals who train patients at home.
Methods: The scientific literature was systematically searched for controlled studies comparing
outcomes and costs of home rehabilitation with the more conventional strategies.
Results: The abstracts of 204 papers were evaluated, from which 89 were selected for greater scrutiny.
From the 89 studies, we found 7 controlled studies involving 1,487 patients (6 of the 7 were
randomized, 4 of the 6 assessed costs). No statistically significant differences, or tendencies
toward differences, were revealed as regards the outcome of home rehabilitation versus
hospital-based alternatives. Thus, home rehabilitation was neither better nor worse at
improving patients' ability to manage on their own or resume social activities. Depression
and reduced quality of life were common in all groups of patients and caregivers, irrespective
of the rehabilitation strategy. In the four randomized studies that reported on costs, home
rehabilitation was found to be less expensive than regular day care, but not less expensive
than conventional strategies even though hospital stay was reduced.
Conclusion: The outcomes and costs of home rehabilitation after stroke seem to be comparable to
alternative treatment strategies.