We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 7, “The Northern Song Technocratic State,” surveys the history of technocratic governance during the Northern Song period (960–1127). The early Song emperors adapted Five Dynasties’ institutional features and wedded them to their own utilitarian and eclectic ideology to achieve the “Great Peace” (Taiping 太平), a project whose achievement Emperor Zhenzong 真宗 (968–1022; r. 997–1022) proclaimed at the great sacrifices to Heaven and Earth in 1008. Simultaneously under Zhenzong, the major administrative and financial structures of the Song technocratic state attained their early maturity. This chapter contains an extended discussion of imperial Daoism, demonstrating how the monarchy utilized Daoist religious ideas to legitimize the emperor’s position as a supreme political leader with unique, unilateral decision-making authority. The rise of Confucian institutionalism in the 1020s and 1030s challenged these claims and sought to move away from the founders’ vertical conception of the state as an extended “private” family toward a more horizontal conception of the state as a “public” body or system of interdependent political actors, of which the emperor was but one component. These two visions of the state co-existed in tension through the middle of the eleventh century. This chapter concludes by examining how Emperor Huizong 徽宗 (1082–1135; r. 1100–1125) returned again to imperial Daoism to justify a renewed and more autocratic system of unified vertical control.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.