Search

Skip to main content Accessibility help

Home
Search

Only show content I have access to (0)

Articles (1)

Over 3 years (1)

From year:

To year:

Apply

Law (1)

federal court of justice

European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) (1)

View selected items
Save to my bookmarks
Export citations
Download PDF (zip)
Save to Kindle
Save to Dropbox
Save to Google Drive
Save content to
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .

To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
Your Kindle email address

Please provide your Kindle email.

@free.kindle.com @kindle.com (service fees apply)

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services

1 results

The Regulation of ‘Speculative Interest-Rate Bets’ by the German Federal Court of Justice — New Dimensions of Market Intervention Hidden Behind the Old Information Model
Jacob Bonavita
Journal:

European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) / Volume 13 / Issue 2 / June 2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:

28 June 2012, pp. 271-280

Print publication:

June 2012
- Article
- - Get access
    
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    
    Log in Register
- Export citation
This article analyses a recent decision by the German Federal Court of Justice in the field of investor protection. At first sight it seems as if the Court held on to a model of investor empowerment by means of informational duties. However, a closer look at the reasoning of the Court reveals a tendency towards heavier intervention in the field of financial advice, oriented towards the regulation of product design. In light of this new dimension of investor protection, the article critically analyses the Federal Court of Justice's use of the disclosure-based investor protection regime.