Search

Summary

This chapter examines the extent to which Eustratius of Nicaea is indebted to the ancient commentary tradition and at the same time how he departed from the earlier model in order to answer contemporary questions about meaning, some of which had a bearing on morality and ethics. In doing so, the chapter considers in detail Eustratius’ hermeneutics and textual approach, its dependence upon the ancient model and the novelties in his approach to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. It argues that Eustratius contributed fundamentally to the formation of a specifically Byzantine commentary tradition by sometimes criticising Aristotle or introducing some motifs that were unrelated to Aristotle’s moral philosophy. Finally, this chapter also investigates the historical circumstances of Eustratius’ career as a commentator and highlights how Eustratius’ literary and philosophical production reflects his patron Anna Comnena as a learned woman who devoted the second part of her life to moral philosophy.

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

1 results

Chapter 11 - Eustratius of Nicaea and the Nicomachean Ethics in Twelfth-century Constantinople: Literary Criticism, Patronage and the Construction of the Byzantine Commentary Tradition

Summary

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

1 results

Chapter 11 - Eustratius of Nicaea and the Nicomachean Ethics in Twelfth-century Constantinople: Literary Criticism, Patronage and the Construction of the Byzantine Commentary Tradition

Summary