Current approaches to the problem of equating different colors for luminance (chromatic isoluminance) rely upon human reports of perceptual events that are reduced at some luminance ratio. In this report, a technique is described that evokes a vivid percept of motion of a textured pattern only at isoluminance. Furthermore, in both humans and monkeys, the moving stimulus produces a striking optokinetic response in the same direction as the perceived motion. If used in this manner, the technique can provide an estimate of chromatic isoluminance in a variety of species and be used to corroborate a human subjects's perceptual judgement.

The objective of the present work was to determine the interaction of cone inputs in the response of horizontal cells using heterochromatic flicker photometry (HFP). Intracellular electrophysiological recordings were made in horizontal cells of isolated retinae of carp maintained in physiological solution, with the receptor side up. Sharp glass microelectrodes filled with 3 M KCl solution with resistances between 100 and 120 MΩ were used. Stimuli comprised six cycles of two 6-Hz sinusoidal light waves in counterphase adjusted for the same number of quanta: a green light (550 nm) from a monochromator with a Xenon lamp and an LED red light (628 nm). The stimulation program consisted of 10 steps with the 550-nm wave at constant amplitude, while the 628-nm wave varied in increments of 10% up to 100%, followed by another 10 steps with the 628-nm wave at constant amplitude while the 550-nm wave varied in increments of 10% up to 100%. We recorded responses from four different horizontal cell classes: H1 (monophasic, broadband, n = 37), H2 (biphasic, red-green color-opponent, n = 13), and H3 (biphasic, blue-yellow color-opponent, n = 2) cone horizontal cells; and RH (monophasic, broadband, n = 3) rod horizontal cells. H1 and RH horizontal cells showed a similar cancellation point at a heterochromatic mixture consistent with mixed inputs from 630- and 550-nm cones. No cancellation point was found for the H2 cell class. Fish H1 cells add cone inputs and signal “luminance” in light levels appropriate for cone stimulation. The same occurs with RH cells, which also signal “luminance,” but in light levels appropriate for rod work. For both cell classes there is an HFP cancellation point occurring at a combination of 628-nm and 550-nm lights in opposing phase that leads to the cancellation of the cell's response. No cancellation was found for H2 and H3 cells, which are the chromatically opponent horizontal cells in lower vertebrates.

Shapiro et al. (2004) introduced a new visual effect (the induced contrast asynchrony) that demonstrates a perceptual separation between the response to a modulated light and the response to contrast of the light relative to background. The effect is composed of two physically identical disks, one surrounded by a dark annulus and the other by a light annulus. The luminance levels of both central disks were modulated in time, producing a stimulus with in-phase luminance modulation and antiphase contrast modulation. Observers primarily perceived the disks to be modulating asynchronously (i.e. they perceived the contrast), but at low temporal frequencies could also track the luminance level. Here we document that the induced contrast asynchrony disappears when the surrounds are achromatic and the center lights are modulated near the equiluminant axis. Observers viewed 1-deg-diameter disks embedded 2-deg-diameter achromatic surrounds. The chromaticity of the disks was modulated in time (1 Hz) along lines in an S versus Luminance cardinal color plane and an L-M versus Luminance cardinal color plane; observers responded as to whether the modulation appeared in phase. For all observers and both color planes, the lights appeared in phase most frequently at angles near the standard observer's equiluminant line and out of phase at angles further away from that line. Observers differed in the range of angles that produce the appearance of in-phase modulation. The results suggest that induced contrast asynchronies may be useful as a technique for equating luminance of disparate lights.

The Zoellner illusion is a geometric distortion occurring when nonorthogonal inducing lines appear to tilt veridically parallel bars. The retinal pathways contributing to such illusions are unknown. The goal of this experiment was to investigate the retinal origin of the illusion. This was accomplished by determining the contrast gain for illusion thresholds. The magnocellular (MC-) and parvocellular (PC-) pathways exhibit different contrast gains, and this difference can be used psychophysically to identify the pathway. The stimulus pattern was four vertical bars with a series of inducing lines. The bars were always 5% higher in contrast than the inducing bars. The pattern was presented on a larger pedestal. Two paradigms were used. In the pulsed-pedestal paradigm, the observer adapted to the background and the pedestal and pattern were presented together as a brief pulse. In the steady-pedestal paradigm, the observer adapted to the continuously presented pedestal and the pattern appeared as a brief pulse. The contrast between the pedestal and the pattern was varied to obtain thresholds for two criteria: perceiving the directions of the inner inducing lines, and perceiving the distortion of the bars. The results for both criteria were similar in shape, but displaced in sensitivity. Detection of the directions of the inner inducing lines was 0.16–0.29 log unit more sensitive than perception of the illusion. The data for the pulsed-pedestal paradigm depended on the contrast between the pedestal and the pattern and produced a shallow V-shape. These results were associated with mediation in the PC-pathway. The data for the steady-pedestal paradigm depended on the pedestal luminance in a linear relation and showed similar sensitivity to the data for the pulsed-pedestal paradigm. Perception of the illusion required 10–15% Weber contrast.