Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 11 - Anthropocene Ethics, as Seen From a Mars Mission: A Story

  • from Part Three - Future Habitations
  • Edited by Julia Adeney Thomas, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book:
    Altered Earth
    Published online:
    24 March 2022
    Print publication:
    31 March 2022, pp 223-231

  • Summary

    Rich men in spaceships have become a meme. For some, they symbolise technological mastery and the will to exploration; for others, they represent the kind of hubris and indifference to nature that have brought us to a futural crisis. The Anthropocene’s arrival is intensifying the ethical chasm between two incompatible ways of seeing the Earth and the place of humans on it. With climatic tipping points approaching, the possibility that the Earth will become uninhabitable for humans within the next century or so is stimulating some thinkers to consider what it would mean for humans (at least, a few of them) to settle elsewhere in the universe, leaving the Earth in ruins. It may be the most profound decision humans (at least, a few of them) will ever make—civilizational phoenix or cosmic grave.