The study was retrospective over 8 years (2010–2017), with review of patient records and analysis of downloads from the implantable cardiac devices to the virtual clinics.

A total of 75 patients were set up for virtual clinic follow-up during the study period, 94.5% with a pacemaker and 5.5% an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. The majority (76.8%) had an epicardial system. Data on lead impedance, battery longevity, programmed parameters, detected arrhythmias, percentage pacing and delivered defibrillator therapies were obtainable by download. Lead threshold measurements were obtainable via download in 83.7% of the devices, including epicardial systems. No concerning device issue was missed. In 15% of patients a major issue was detected remotely, including three patients with lead fractures. The virtual clinics resulted in fewer hospital attendances while enhancing monitoring and enabling more frequent device checks. The vast majority (91.4%) of families who responded to a questionnaire were satisfied with the virtual clinic follow-up.

Virtual clinics allow safe and effective follow-up of children with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators, including those with epicardial systems and are associated with high levels of parent satisfaction.

Nurses and respiratory therapists are seldom allowed to use automated external defibrillators (AED) during in-hospital cardiac arrest. This can result in significant time delays before defibrillation occurs and lower survival for cardiac arrest victims. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to AED use by nurses and respiratory therapists.

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with a purposeful sample of nurses and respiratory therapists. We developed the interview guide based on the constructs of the theory of planned behaviour, which elicits salient attitudes, social influences, and control beliefs potentially influencing the intent to use an AED. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed until achieving data saturation. Two independent reviewers performed inductive analyses to identify emerging categories and themes, and ranked them by frequency of the number of participants stating the topic.

Demographics for the 24 interviewees include mean age 40.5, 79.2% female, 87.5% performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), 29.2% defibrillated a patient. Identified attitudes pertained to the timeliness of defibrillation, patient survival, simplicity of AED use, accuracy of rhythm recognition, and harm to self or others. Social influences consisted of physician and hospital administration support of AED use. Control beliefs included training on AED use, policy allowing AED use, familiarity with AED, and task burden during resuscitation.

Most nurses and respiratory therapists intended to use an AED if permitted to do so by a medical directive. Successful implementation would require educational initiatives focusing on safety and efficacy of AEDs, support from physicians and hospital administrators, and additional training on AED use.

The automated external defibrillator (AED) is a tool that contributes to survival with mixed outcomes. This review assesses the effectiveness of the AED, consistencies and variations among studies, and how varying outcomes can be resolved.

A worksheet for the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) 2010 science review focused on hospital survival in AED programs was the foundation of the articles reviewed. Articles identified in the search covering a broader range of topics were added. All articles were read by at least two authors; consensus discussions resolved differences.

AED use developed sequentially. Use of AEDs by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) compared to manual defibrillators showed equal or superior survival. AED use was extended to trained responders likely to be near victims, such as fire/rescue, police, airline attendants, and casino security guards, with improvement in all venues but not all programs. Broad public access initiatives demonstrated increased survival despite low rates of AED use. Home AED programs have not improved survival; in-hospital trials have had mixed results. Successful programs have placed devices in high-risk sites, maintained the AEDs, recruited a team with a duty to respond, and conducted ongoing assessment of the program.

The AED can affect survival among patients with sudden ventricular fibrillation (VF). Components of AED programs that affect outcome include the operator, location, the emergency response system, ongoing maintenance and evaluation. Comparing outcomes is complicated by variations in definitions of populations and variables. The effect of AEDs on individuals can be dramatic, but the effect on populations is limited.

StokesNA , ScapigliatiA , TrammellAR , ParishDC . The Effect of the AED and AED Programs on Survival of Individuals, Groups and Populations. Prehosp Disaster Med.2012;27(5):1–6.

The purpose of this study was to describe the regional locations of cardiac arrest, and to identify public locations and the annual incidence of arrests within the identified locations, in order to help to determine optimal placement of Automatic External Defibrillators (AEDs) under the regional Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Program. This is a retrospective study.

The locations of cardiac arrest were abstracted from Ambulance Call Reports (ACRs) collected by the Essex-Kent Base Hospital Centre from regional ambulance services throughout the City of Windsor, and the Counties of Essex and Kent, Ontario, Canada, from 01 January 1994 through 31 December 2000. Arrest locations were grouped into five categories, and then the number of public venues was determined. Public sites were grouped into 28 Public Locations. Also included in the Public Sites were both General Industry and Outdoors categories. Categories identified but excluded from Public Sites were Institutions and Private Residences.

During the study, 2,295 arrests occurred, 152 cases were excluded, 2,142 arrests were categorized, (average annual incidence of 306 ±50.4 cardiac arrests), 329 (15.4%) of which were in Public Sites. Nineteen public venues had an average of >1 arrest/year, and nine public venues had an average of ≤1 arrest/year during the study, period. Calculations of the annual incidence of arrests for each public location were completed.

These findings have significant prehospital emergency cardiac care implications for communities that wish to strengthen/improve their responses to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Public Access Defibrillation Programs should identify the site-specific incidence of arrest within their communities in order to provide legitimacy for funding and planning of programs. Training and availability of AEDs will reduce the time to first shock, thus strengthening the chain-of-survival and will save more lives.