In the late 1930s, European engineers discovered that, for very low flow rates, rotary disk atomizers produced a more definable range of droplet sizes than hydraulic atomizers. In the late 1970s, a cup-like spinning atomizer was developed to apply herbicides at low and ultra-low volumes. Rotary atomizers distribute droplets in a pattern similar to hollow cone nozzles. The droplet trajectory could affect deposits adversely since droplets released horizontally are exposed to wind and other environmental effects longer than hydraulic spray nozzles. Propellers and fans were used to enhance downward movement of droplets without considering that droplet impingement velocity was critical for efficient deposition. In the early 1980s, rotary atomizers were promoted to reduce herbicide rates, but the claims were products of unconfirmed testing. Herbicide efficacy in confirmed research was not influenced by application with the rotary atomizer, but lower carrier rates reduced the amount of water handled during the spraying operation. The cost of the atomizer, more maintenance, and greater care during operation with no decrease in herbicide rates discourage continued use.

Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] toxicity to volunteer wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA] was influenced more by carrier volume than application method. Glyphosate phytotoxicity increased when carrier volume was reduced with both application methods. When compared at equal carrier volumes, there was little difference in volunteer wheat or large crabgrass control when glyphosate was applied with a controlled droplet applicator or flat fan nozzles. Volunteer wheat and large crabgrass control with controlled droplet applicators was influenced by application factors. At a given carrier volume, application factors which yielded larger droplets generally resulted in superior vegetation control.