Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 10 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

  • from Part III - The Tools for Assertive Representation of EU Interests
  • Wolfgang Weiß, University Speyer, Cornelia Furculita, University Speyer
  • Book:
    Open Strategic Autonomy in EU Trade Policy
    Print publication:
    12 December 2024, pp 369-441

  • Summary

    Chapter 10 focuses on the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), introducing carbon pricing on imported products from certain sectors, in an attempt to address carbon leakage and, intentionally or not, ensuring a level playing field between domestic and imported products. The chapter presents the mechanism, its aims, and its consistency with EU’s international environmental and trade commitments. Accordingly, the chapter analyses the question of CBAM’s compatibility with the international principle of common but differentiated responsibility (CBDR) as it treats developing and least developed countries on an equal footing with the developed ones. Then it considers the question of the mechanism’s compliance with WTO rules, in particular WTO non-discrimination rules and prohibition on quantitative restrictions. It pays special attention to potential justifications of possible breaches and whether they could accommodate also a CBAM in line with the CBDR principle, thereby addressing the convoluted question of the relationship between international trade and climate regimes.