The XIth cranial nerve or accessory nerve provides the motor supply to the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. It is frequently encountered during neck surgery, and as such is at risk of iatrogenic injury, resulting in the ‘shoulder syndrome’. Historically, the nerve was sacrificed on oncological grounds during radical neck dissection. However, the basis for sacrifice is unfounded in the majority of cases, and accessory nerve sparing selective neck dissection has equal oncological efficacy. The path of the nerve in the neck is very variable, and there is not a wholly reliable landmark for its identification. However, there are a number of methods described in the literature to guide the surgeon in its identification. This paper provides a systematic review of all the methods available for identification of the accessory nerve, and comments on the reliability of each. In doing so, the detailed anatomy of the accessory nerve is also described.

Objectives: To describe the use of the great auricular nerve as a 'road map' for locating the accessory nerve in the anterior and posterior triangle, in comparison with other methods described in the literature.

Design: A review of the literature using Medline and Embase searches was performed. Illustrative photographs were taken from consenting, elective patients.

Results: Various methods have been described, using different anatomical landmarks. We describe a new method, based on the fact that the great auricular nerve runs, with relation to the edges of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, 1 cm superior to the accessory nerve anteriorly and 1 cm inferior posteriorly.

Conclusions: This is a reliable and safe method, used by the senior authors in their extensive work as head and neck and skull base surgeons. It allows the accessory nerve to be located in both the anterior and posterior triangle. This avoids the inherent dangers of following the nerve's tortuous course through the sternocleidomastoid.

Considerable inter- and intra-individual anatomical differences can be observed during neck dissections. In this case report, we describe an unusual relationship of the accessory nerve to the internal jugular vein.

The aim of this study was to evaluate spinal accessory nerve function after functional neck dissection (FND) and radical neck dissection (RND) by monitoring the nerve with electromyographic (EMG) examinations. A prospective, double-blind, clinical study was undertaken in 21 patients (42 neck side dissections) operated on for head and neck malignant diseases, separated into two groups: 10 neck sides in the RND group and 32 neck sides in the FND group. Electromyographic examinations were performed pre-operatively and post-operatively in the third week and third and ninth months. Additionally, a questionnaire, modified from the neck dissection impairment index, was applied to all the patients in order to assess shoulder function in the ninth post-operative month.

All patients had maximum EMG scores pre-operatively. Following the operation, motor amplitudes decreased in both groups. At the third post-operative month, amplitudes decreased to their lowest values. As expected, the decreases in amplitude and EMG score were more prominent in the RND group. Following reinnervation, the amplitudes of the trapezius motor response increased in the FND group but never reached pre-operative values (during the time of follow up). The FND group scores for pain, neck and shoulder stiffness, and disability in heavy object lifting, light object lifting and reaching overhead were significantly lower than those of the RND group.

In FND, one aims to preserve anatomically the spinal accessory nerve, and it is presumed to be intact after the procedure. However, using EMG nerve function monitoring, our study revealed that profound spinal nerve injury was detected immediately after FND surgery, which tended to improve over subsequent months but had not regained its original function by the end of the ninth post-operative month.

Introduction: Preservation of the spinal accessory nerve during neck dissection should be the rule rather than the exception. Despite the presence of many described techniques to locate the nerve, a tedious dissection is often required; as a consequence, it remains vulnerable to damage.

Method: We describe a novel method, not previously reported, based on identifying a constant vein which crosses the nerve. This aids in the nerve's early identification.

Conclusion: Our method enables the surgeon to locate the nerve precisely and to avoid damage to it, thereby maximizing post-operative function.

Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) during neck dissection may result in significant and avoidable morbidity in the form of ’shoulder syndrome’. The authors describe a simple method, based on the anatomy of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM), which allows consistent and rapid identification of the SAN in the upper neck during dissection, thereby facilitating its preservation.

Glomus tumours of the skull base are rare, and most frequently present with symptoms of hearing loss and tinnitus. Diagnosis is often delayed due to the slow growth of the tumour. We describe the previously unreported occurrence of a glomus tumour presenting with a unilateral accessory nerve palsy.

Iatrogenic injury to the spinal accessory nerve following surgical procedures in the neck is well recognized in causing significant morbidity to patients, with shoulder pain and loss of function being particularly problematic. We have used a Magstim Neurosign 100 peripheral nerve monitor, that is most often used in our practice to monitor the facial nerve during middle ear and parotid surgery, to monitor the accessory nerve during neck surgery. Ten patients undergoing accessory nerve-sparing neck dissection, or excision biopsy of neck mass had their accessory nerve monitored during the procedure. No patient suffered injury of the nerve. In several cases the nerve closely adhered to the tissue being resected, and in two cases, the nerve bifurcated or gave off branches. We found that the monitor aided identification and preservation of the nerve.

A 50-year-old man presented with a left-sided neck mass. Clinical examination revealed a large fluctuant 7 cm × 7 cm mass in the left posterior triangle. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an encapsulated soft tissue lesion. He underwent exploration of the neck and a 14 cm by 8 cm mass enfolding the accessory nerve was identified and completely excised. Histological examination of the surgical specimen showed features in keeping with a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST). We present the clinical and pathological features, of this condition.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) may spread posterolaterally with infiltration of the jugular foramen, jugular vein and the cranial nerves IX-XI. Cranial nerve palsies may be evident clinically but the extent of skull base infiltration is best assessed radiologically. Denervation atrophy is well demonstrated by both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). Accurate delineation of the lesion is important in prognosis and radiotherapy planning.