Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Part one Religion and religious studies: the irony of inheritance
- Part two Major theoretical problems
- 5 Social order or social chaos
- 6 Tradition: the power of constraint
- 7 The text and the world
- 8 On the role of normativity in religious studies
- 9 Translation
- 10 Material religion
- 11 Theology and the study of religion: a relationship
- Part three Methodological variations
- Index
6 - Tradition: the power of constraint
from Part two - Major theoretical problems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2012
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- Part one Religion and religious studies: the irony of inheritance
- Part two Major theoretical problems
- 5 Social order or social chaos
- 6 Tradition: the power of constraint
- 7 The text and the world
- 8 On the role of normativity in religious studies
- 9 Translation
- 10 Material religion
- 11 Theology and the study of religion: a relationship
- Part three Methodological variations
- Index
Summary
To Valerius Maximus, the fawning author of Memorable Doings and Sayings, dedicated to the Roman emperor Tiberius sometime between 14–37 ce, it was self-evident that Roman religious practices were profoundly traditional. “Our ancestors (Maiores),” he states at the very beginning of his tract in his discussion of “On Religion” (De religione), decreed the very foundations and institutions of Roman religion. The “ancients” (antiques) zealously sought both to observe and to expand religion, and Valerius Maximus reports approvingly of several rituals and auguries that were performed “in the way of our ancestors,” the mos maiorum.
It is generally not wise to rely on the testimony of Valerius Maximus, a man who, as one classical scholar writes, “possessed neither sharpness of intellect nor clarity of style.” In this case, however, Valerius Maximus accurately reflected not only the common Roman belief about their own religion but also a sentiment widely shared throughout the circum-Mediterranean and Near East. Piety, defined by Cicero (first century bce) as “justice towards the gods,” meant in part honoring ancestral customs. One of the primary reasons that Romans looked askance at early Christians was that Christians rejected the customs of their ancestors. Nor were Romans alone in their insistence on preserving ancestral practices. In the face of immense social, economic, political, and religious challenges, Egyptians in late antiquity tenaciously held to traditional religious practices.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies , pp. 130 - 150Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 2
- Cited by