Since 1963, provincial, federal and municipal politicians have devoted considerable attention to problems associated with political finance and election expenses. Prompted by scandals – and the public reaction thereto – as well as by rising media costs and organizational expenses associated with sample surveys and the new techniques of political marketing, and shortfalls in party and candidate campaign funds, legislators at all levels have attempted to regulate the collection and spending of money by electoral competitors and the subsidization of political war-chests from the public purse. Consensus for change and the agreement of political rivals was obtained in almost all instances by way of royal commissions, advisory committees, party commissions and legislative committees whose hearings and recommendations served to build public support and formed the basis for much of the legislation which was subsequently enacted. The proposals made and the measures adopted have been legitimated as promoting the probity and honesty of the electoral process, the liberal values of equity, the equality of chances and opportunity, as well as facilitating the participation in – and the openness of – the election system, and the capping of escalating costs which benefit only the well-endowed to the detriment of those of lesser means.

Undoubtedly, the various regulatory schemes have constrained many of the gross abuses witnessed formerly, but few would argue that these have been completely eliminated. Recent prosecutions in Nova Scotia and allegations made following the latest provincial and federal elections indicate the contrary.