Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I FEDERALISM THEORY, HISTORY, AND PREEMPTION VARIABLES
- Part II THE LAYERED GOVERNMENT NORM
- Part III JUDICIAL TREATMENT AND INTERPRETIVE CHOICE
- Part IV PREEMPTION TALES FROM THE FIELD
- 11 The Regulation–Common Law Feedback Loop in Nonpreemptive Regimes
- 12 Delegated Federalism Versus Devolution: Some Insights from the History of Water Pollution Control
- 13 Adaptive Environmental Federalism
- Conclusion: The Menu of Preemption Choice Variables
- Index
13 - Adaptive Environmental Federalism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I FEDERALISM THEORY, HISTORY, AND PREEMPTION VARIABLES
- Part II THE LAYERED GOVERNMENT NORM
- Part III JUDICIAL TREATMENT AND INTERPRETIVE CHOICE
- Part IV PREEMPTION TALES FROM THE FIELD
- 11 The Regulation–Common Law Feedback Loop in Nonpreemptive Regimes
- 12 Delegated Federalism Versus Devolution: Some Insights from the History of Water Pollution Control
- 13 Adaptive Environmental Federalism
- Conclusion: The Menu of Preemption Choice Variables
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION
Environmental law is not neatly divided between the federal government and the states. The federal government continues to involve itself in highly localized issues with little clear connection to interstate environmental issues or a manifest need for federal uniformity. At the same time, states and local governments, especially recently, are not content to confine their attention to issues of local concern but are developing policies on environmental issues of national and even international importance. Nor do environmental issues “stay” in the control of any particular level of government but rather tend to pass back and forth, much like the proverbial football, between different levels of government.
The current system of environmental federalism is therefore a dynamic one of overlapping federal and state jurisdiction. However, it is threatened by federal legislation and Supreme Court rulings. A wave of preemptive legislation has emerged from Congress in recent years. Numerous bills pending in Congress, for example, would preempt state actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) that contribute to climate change. Similarly, following a long line of cases in which the Supreme Court has preempted a variety of state actions designed to protect the public, the Court recently (2004) preempted state auto-pollution regulations, despite, at best, ambiguous statutory language.
Legal academics are similarly hostile to the dynamism of environmental federalism because it runs contrary to the prevailing view that an optimal level of government exists from which to set environmental policy.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Preemption ChoiceThe Theory, Law, and Reality of Federalism's Core Question, pp. 277 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
- 1
- Cited by