Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:41:41.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recombinant angiotensin II therapy in a child with cardiac dysfunction and Pandoraea and Candida sepsis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2023

Michael E. Kim*
Affiliation:
Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Stuart L. Goldstein
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Meghan M. Chlebowski
Affiliation:
Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
*
Corresponding author: M. E. Kim, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recombinant angiotensin II is an emerging drug therapy for refractory hypotension. Its use is relevant to patients with disruption of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system denoted by elevated direct renin levels. We present a child that responded to recombinant angiotensin II in the setting of right ventricular hypertension and multi-organism septic shock.

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system is a hormonal axis responsible for blood pressure regulation and fluid balance. Reference Bellomo, Forni and Busse1 Disruption of this system leads to hypotension, fluid shifts, and electrolyte derangements. Reference Nguyen, Denimal and Dargent2 Several mechanisms responsible include pro-inflammatory conditions, endothelial injury, and end-organ damage. Reference Nguyen, Denimal and Dargent2 Classically, critically ill patients with vasoplegia and hypotension are managed with vasoactive agents including vasopressin, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine. Reference Rhodes, Evans and Alhazzani3

While vasopressors are effective and recommended for the management of sepsis and circulatory shock, there are instances in which patients become tolerant or respond sub-optimally to therapy. Reference Bellomo, Forni and Busse1 Recombinant angiotensin II has been studied as a potential adjunctive therapy in patients identified as “responders” denoted by elevated renin levels [1, 4]. This patient subtype has been described in both the adult and paediatric population by achieving a normotensive state and discontinuing from other vasoactive therapies. Reference Bellomo, Forni and Busse1,Reference Busse, McCurdy, Ali, Hall, Chen and Ostermann4Reference Chawla, Busse and Brasha-Mitchell7 The medication’s utility in patients with cardiac dysfunction has not been fully described. There are promising results with its use in adult and paediatric cardiac surgery patients liberating from cardiopulmonary bypass. Reference Kozik and Tweddell8

We present a paediatric patient with cardiac dysfunction and septic shock who received recombinant angiotensin II therapy.

Case presentation

The patient is a previously healthy 19-month-old female with a history of intermittent febrile illnesses 3 months prior to initial presentation. She was diagnosed with bilateral necrotising pneumonia ultimately requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. She remained on ECMO throughout her clinical course. She was referred to our institution for lung transplant evaluation. Respiratory cultures from the prior institution grew Acinetobacter spp and gram-negative rods. She was positive for adenovirus and her urine cultures grew Candida spp.

Upon transfer she was haemodynamically stable with significant sedation. The therapeutic goals were to rehabilitate her lungs and treat residual infection to formally evaluate for lung transplantation. Initial echocardiogram demonstrated normal cardiac anatomy with no right ventricular hypertension. She initially improved with serial bronchoscopies and ventilator manipulation. Her bronchoalveolar lavage cultures grew Candida parapsilosis. She had respiratory cultures that grew gram negative rods that did not speciate (day 1) and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (day 8). On day 9, she developed fluid overload and metabolic acidosis requiring initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy. She grew Staphylococcus aureus from her blood culture on day 11.

On day 16, she developed hemodynamic instability and became more hypotensive over the next 48 hours with extremely labile blood pressures despite epinephrine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin infusions, inhaled nitric oxide, steroids, and aggressive fluid replacement. Her blood cultures grew Candida parapsilosis which prompted treatment with antifungal therapy and removal of her indwelling central line. Echocardiogram revealed right ventricular hypertension, mild right ventricular dilation with diminished function, mild to moderate tricuspid valve regurgitation, and normal left ventricular systolic function. She received pulmonary vasodilator therapy including inhaled nitric oxide at 20 ppm (maximum dose 40ppm).

On day 17, due refractory hypotension on multiple agents (epinephrine 0.2 mcg/kg/min, norepinephrine 0.16 mcg/kg/min, vasopressin 2 milliunits/kg/min), we used recombinant angiotensin II (GiaprezaTM, La Jolla Pharmaceuticals, San Diego) with an initial starting dose of 10 ng/kg/min. Her baseline renin level was 4284 pg/mL (ref 3.2 – 52.2 pg/ml), indicating a high likelihood for response. Subsequent renin levels were 5776 (24 hours from initial level) and > 6000 (48 hours from initial level). Within 1 hour of initiation, her blood pressure normalised and her other infusions were tapered successfully. She clinically progressed over the next 24 hours until she became labile again despite titrating as high as 40 ng/kg/min. Her condition deteriorated and she required CPR on day 20. Her family decided to withdraw care due to her ongoing hemodynamic instability, end organ dysfunction, and persistent fungemia on day 22.

Autopsy demonstrated diffuse, necrotising pneumonia with near-complete liquefaction of the left upper lobe and innumerable seeded foci. Bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial cultures of lung tissue were collected. Mycobacterial cultures showed “no growth” and direct tissue fungal cultures grew Candida parapsilosis. Bacterial cultures grew a gram-negative bacilli that was not identifiable using the bioMerieux Vitek MS MALDI-ToF (Mass Spectrometry Time of Flight) system. DNA was extracted from colonies and sent to our DNA Sequencing and Genotyping Core Laboratory. Top results from BLAST nucleotide search of the sequence of the 16 sRNA region were Pandoraea pulmonicola (99.63%), Pandoraea nosoerga (97.35%), and Pandoraea thiooxydans (97.21%). The Pandoraea spp. is suspected to be the same organism that was growing from her initial respiratory cultures at the outside institution.

Discussion

Pandoraea spp. are antibiotic resistant, pathogenic Gram negative rods that reside in the soil and the environment. Reference Degand, Lotte and Decondé Le Butor9 Infections have mostly been reported in patients with cystic fibrosis. Reference Degand, Lotte and Decondé Le Butor9 In our review of the literature, this is the first documented paediatric patient without cystic fibrosis to have bacteraemia with this species. One possible contributing factor in this patient is an immunodeficiency given she had an abnormal neutrophil burst assay and treatment-resistant polymicrobial infections. Postmortem testing revealed a variant of unknown significance in a relevant gene implicated in chronic granulomatous disease.

Recombinant angiotensin II is a novel vasoactive therapy in those identified as responders. Studies have shown correlation with elevated renin levels and an anticipated response of blood pressure. Reference Bellomo, Forni and Busse1,Reference Busse, McCurdy, Ali, Hall, Chen and Ostermann4,Reference Klijian, Khanna and Reddy6,Reference Chawla, Busse and Brasha-Mitchell7 It has also been described that patients with elevated renin levels receiving standard vasoactive therapy have poorer outcomes. Reference Nguyen, Denimal and Dargent2

Management of distributive shock and cardiac dysfunction is challenging. There is competition with optimising preload, contractility, and afterload reduction while maintaining adequate end-organ perfusion in a vasoplegic state. In an acidotic state, cardiac function is compromised which also decreases efficacy of inotropes. Reference Rhodes, Evans and Alhazzani3 Post-cardiopulmonary bypass is another scenario where patients respond unpredictably to vasoactive therapies and suffer from low cardiac output. Reference Weis, Kilger and Beiras-Fernandez10

Recombinant angiotensin II is a unique therapy that facilitates rapid vasoconstriction utilising the body’s natural hormonal axis. Identifying “responders” to therapy would provide new management strategies in the setting of sepsis or inflammation. Given that it was used as a last resort in our patient, understanding optimal timing, dosing, and patient “responders” is critical for its future utility.

Conclusion

Management of septic shock with cardiac dysfunction has no ideal therapeutic options. Traditional pharmacologic and supportive options are still the standard of care. Recombinant angiotensin II is a potential pharmacologic intervention that may be an alternative therapy for this scenario.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Drs. Jennifer Kasten and Joel Mortensen from the Department of Pathology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center for their contributions and assistance with the diagnosis of the patient and classification of the species reported. We would also like to thank the multi-disciplinary team including staff, nursing, and physicians at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center for the collaboration and cooperation to deliver the best care for our patients.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Bellomo, R, Forni, LG, Busse, LW, et al. Renin and survival in patients given angiotensin II for catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 202: 12531261.10.1164/rccm.201911-2172OCCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, M, Denimal, D, Dargent, A, et al. Plasma renin concentration is associated with hemodynamic deficiency. Shock 2019; 52: e22e30.10.1097/SHK.0000000000001285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, A, Evans, LE, Alhazzani, W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43: 304377.10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busse, LW, McCurdy, MT, Ali, O, Hall, A, Chen, H, Ostermann, M. The effect of angiotensin II on blood pressure in patients with circulatory shock. Crit Care 2017; 21: 324.10.1186/s13054-017-1896-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khanna, A, English, SW, Wang, XS, et al. Angiotensin II for the treatment of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 419430.10.1056/NEJMoa1704154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klijian, A, Khanna, AK, Reddy, VS, et al. Treatment with angiotensin II is associated with rapid blood pressure response. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35: 5158.10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chawla, LS, Busse, L, Brasha-Mitchell, E, et al. Intravenous angiotensin II for the treatment of high-output shock. Crit Care 2014; 18: 534.10.1186/s13054-014-0534-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kozik, DJ, Tweddell, JS. Characterizing the inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: S234754.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.02.073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degand, N, Lotte, R, Decondé Le Butor, Célia, et al. Epidemic spread of Pandoraea pulmonicola in a cystic fibrosis center. BMC Infect Dis 2015; 15: 583.10.1186/s12879-015-1327-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, F, Kilger, E, Beiras-Fernandez, A, et al. Association between vasopressor dependence and early outcome in patients after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 938942.10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04779.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed