Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:33:04.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

School feeding contributes to micronutrient adequacy of Ghanaian schoolchildren

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2014

Abdul-Razak Abizari*
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Community Nutrition, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
Christiana Buxton
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Lugutuah Kwara
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Joseph Mensah-Homiah
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana
Margaret Armar-Klemesu
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
Inge D. Brouwer
Affiliation:
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: A.-R. Abizari, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Without gains in nutritional outcomes, it is unlikely that school feeding programmes (SFP) could improve cognition and academic performance of schoolchildren despite the improvements in school enrolment. We compared the nutrient intake adequacy and Fe and nutritional status of SFP and non-SFP participants in a cross-sectional survey involving 383 schoolchildren (aged 5–13 years). Quantitative 24 h recalls and weighed food records, repeated in 20 % subsample, were used to estimate energy and nutrient intakes adjusted for day-to-day variations. The probability of adequacy (PA) was calculated for selected micronutrients and the mean of all PA (MPA) was calculated. The concentrations of Hb, serum ferritin, and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and anthropometric measurements were used to determine Fe and nutritional status. Energy and nutrient intakes and their adequacies were significantly higher among SFP participants (P< 0·001). The MPA of micronutrients was significantly higher among SFP participants (0·61 v. 0·18; P< 0·001), and the multiple-micronutrient-fortified corn soya blend was a key contributor to micronutrient adequacy. In SFP participants, 6 g/l higher Hb concentrations (P< 0·001) and about 10 % points lower anaemia prevalence (P= 0·06) were observed. The concentration of sTfR was significantly lower among SFP participants (11·2 v. 124 mg/l; P= 0·04); however, there was no difference in the prevalence of Fe deficiency and Fe-deficiency anaemia between SFP and non-SFP participants. There was also no significant difference in the prevalence of thinness, underweight and stunting. In conclusion, the present results indicate that school feeding is associated with higher intakes and adequacies of energy and nutrients, but not with the prevalence of Fe and nutritional status indicators. The results also indicate an important role for micronutrient-dense foods in the achievement of micronutrient adequacy within SFP.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

Chronic malnutrition is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, especially among poor rural households( Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta 1 ), and it is mainly caused by morbidity and inadequate dietary intake( 2 ). Infants and young children are most affected by the physical and mental deficits occurring due to chronic malnutrition. These deficits are carried over into the school-age period, where they retard cognitive function, educability and future productivity( Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta 1 ). Most interventions at the household and community levels are, however, preferentially targeted outside the first 1000 d of life( Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta 1 , Reference Bundy, Burbano and Grosh 3 ). ‘The school’ may serve as a platform for targeted interventions, such as school feeding programmes (SFP), to contribute to the fulfilment of the nutritional needs of children outside the first 1000 d of life. However, in settings where school enrolment and attendance are low, targeting interventions at schoolchildren may still be problematic. In Africa and other developing continents, SFP have therefore been instituted primarily as food-for-education programmes in resource-poor settings not only to improve school enrolment and attendance but also as means to improve nutritional status through improved energy and nutrient intakes( Reference Adelman, Gilligan and Lehrer 4 ).

Following the formulation of the UN Millennium Development Goals, SFP received renewed interest for their potential contribution to the achievement of Millennium Development Goals 1 and 2. In line with the recommendations of the UN Hunger Task Force, there has been a shift in the paradigm of SFP towards linking local food production to consumption at schools (home-grown school feeding) with the aims of creating and improving access to market for poor rural farmers, stimulating local food production and also improving the local economy of beneficiary communities( 5 ). The shift in paradigm received support from African Governments through the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme of the New Partnership for Africa's Development, thereby putting SFP on the political agenda of Africa( 6 ). Since 2005, the Government of Ghana has piloted and up-scaled the Ghana School Feeding Programme through which schoolchildren are provided one nutritious meal per school day to encourage educational participation (enrolment, attendance and retention) and also improve nutrient intake and nutritional status( 7 ).

However, comprehensive reviews of empirical research( Reference Bundy, Burbano and Grosh 3 , Reference Adelman, Gilligan and Lehrer 4 , Reference Kristjansson, Robinson and Petticrew 8 ) and programme evaluation reports( Reference Buttenheim, Alderman and Friedman 9 Reference Kazianga, de Walque and Alderman 11 ) have shown that although SFP have had positive impacts on educational participation, their impacts on nutritional outcomes have been rather unclear( Reference Bundy, Burbano and Grosh 3 , Reference Adelman, Gilligan and Lehrer 4 , Reference Kristjansson, Robinson and Petticrew 8 Reference Kazianga, de Walque and Alderman 11 ) and partly blamed substitution effect of school feeding on home consumption for the lack of effect. Moreover, in the Lancet series on Maternal and Child Undernutrition, SFP targeting children aged >2 years have been described as interventions that are unlikely to improve nutritional status( Reference Bryce, Coitinho and Darnton-Hill 12 ) because such interventions are outside the window of opportunity for improvement in nutritional outcomes, particularly stunting.

Without evidence of a positive impact on nutritional outcomes, it is unlikely for SFP to improve cognition and academic performance despite the demonstrable improvements in educational participation. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to assess the nutrient intake adequacy and Fe and nutritional status of schoolchildren participating in a government-supported SFP in northern Ghana relative to non-participating children.

Subjects and methods

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study involving the quantitative measurement of energy and nutrient intakes and Fe and nutritional status of children in school feeding and non-school feeding schools. At the inception of the government-supported pilot SFP in northern Ghana in October 2005, baseline usual nutrient intakes and Fe and nutritional status of schoolchildren in the study area were not measured. Therefore, in the present study, only children in schools participating in a SFP were compared with their neighbouring non-school feeding counterparts at a point in time. At the time of the study, the government-supported SFP had been operational in the study area for about 3 years and all children in primary school in both beneficiary schools received lunch at school, but not all participated in the present study.

Data collection for the survey was conducted over a period of 1 month (1st week of November 2008 to 2nd week of December 2008). Ethical clearance was given by the Institutional Review Board of Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana (NMIMR-IRB 022/08-09). Permission was also sought from the District Administration, District Education Office, head teachers and local authorities in each community. After information sessions, parents/caregivers who volunteered to participate in the study gave written informed consent.

Study area

The study was conducted in four of the 132 primary schools in Tolon-Kumbungu District of Northern Region, Ghana. The four rural primary schools (from four communities) were approximately 50 km away from the main city in the region, Tamale, and within 5 km radius from each other. Of these schools, two (Tibung and Kpalgung primary) were the pilot schools for the government-supported SFP in Tolon-Kumbungu District, which started in October 2005 and was still running at the time of the study. The other two schools (Wayamba and Jegbo primary), which qualified to benefit from SFP but were not yet enrolled, were selected as control schools based on their similarity with the pilot schools with respect to the following characteristics: number of children enrolled in school; school infrastructure; size of community; absence of market infrastructure; water and sanitation facilities; proximity to each other. The study area is within the Guinea Savanna vegetation zone, having a typical unimodal rainy season (April–September) and one dry season (December–March) characterised by relatively high temperatures (35–40°C). People living in this area are mostly subsistence farmers( 13 ). Malaria is hyperendemic in this area( Reference Ehrhardt, Burchard and Mantel 14 ) and is the main cause of morbidity among children( 13 ). Malaria transmission peaks towards the end of the rainy season (October and November)( Reference Owusu-Agyei, Koram and Baird 15 ).

Subjects and sampling

Subjects

Children (aged 5–13 years) in classes 1–3 from the four schools in Tolon-Kumbungu District were included if they were enrolled in school for at least one academic year at the time of the study. Mothers or alternate caregivers were interviewed to obtain data on the dietary intake of children because they prepared and served meals in the households.

Sample size and sampling procedure

Due to paucity of literature on the usual nutrient intake of schoolchildren in the study area, anaemia prevalence (proxy for Fe status) among schoolchildren was used for the determination of sample size. Based on an assumed anaemia prevalence of 50 % among non-school feeding participants, a sample size of about 180 children per group was required to estimate a 15 % point difference in anaemia prevalence between the school feeding and non-school feeding groups with 95 % confidence (one-sided) and a power of 90 %. Taking into account 10 % attrition, sample size was rounded to 200 per group.

A total of 383 schoolchildren were recruited for the study: 196 from the school feeding group and 187 from the non-school feeding group. In each of the four schools, children were randomly selected from a sampling frame of pupils in lower primary (classes 1–3). The sampling frame was constructed separately for each school by pooling together the registers of lower primary. If two or more children were selected from one household, one of them was randomly selected by lottery to participate in the study.

Data collection and measurements

Household questionnaire

A semi-structured survey instrument was used to collect information on the sociodemographic characteristics of children and their households. Parents/caregivers were asked to indicate whether their child was ill during the 2 weeks preceding the survey. The instrument also included the standardised and validated( Reference Deitchler, Ballard and Swindale 16 ) Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Household Hunger Scale (HHS). The HHS is a three items-by-three frequencies of occurrence scale and was used for the assessment of the food supply situation of participating households( Reference Ballard, Coates and Swindale 17 ). The survey instrument was translated into the local language (Dagbani) and pretested by trained research assistants before being used in the survey. The standard reference period of 30 d was used for the HHS assessment( Reference Ballard, Coates and Swindale 17 ).

24 h recall method

Quantitative 24 h recalls (24 hR), repeated in 20 % subsample, were collected by six trained research assistants (first degree nutrition graduates), who spoke the local language and had knowledge of the study area. A minimum duration of 2 d was allowed between repeated recalls to avoid dependency of intake on two consecutive days, especially caused by the consumption of leftover foods( Reference RS and EL 18 ). Weekend days were excluded. Days of the week and interviewers were randomly allocated to children to account for differences between days and interviewers, and interviewers were not allowed to interview the same household twice. All 24 hR were completed within the same post-harvest season, a period of minimum food scarcity.

A standard multiple-pass procedure was used for all 24 hR( Reference RS and EL 18 ). First, mothers/caregivers were asked to provide details on all foods and beverages that their child had consumed during the preceding 24 h (wake up-to-wake up) including anything consumed outside home. After probing for likely forgotten foods with the help of the index child( Reference Gewa, Murphy and Neumann 19 ), they were asked to give a detailed description of foods and beverages consumed, including ingredients and cooking methods for mixed dishes and place and time of consumption. The amount of each food and beverage and ingredients of mixed dishes was weighed or, when not available, estimated in household measures or their monetary equivalent. The weight of foods and ingredients of mixed dishes was measured using a digital kitchen scale (Soehnle Plateau, model 65 086), precise to 2 g with a maximum capacity of 10 kg. Factors for converting household measures and monetary values into weight were determined afterwards. The total volume of all foods and mixed dishes cooked, volume consumed by child and leftover from child's food were determined to derive the proportion of total prepared food consumed by the child. For SFP participants, the 24 hR did not include detailed recall of lunch served at school under SFP. Rather, the weighed food record (done at school) was used to measure the quantity of lunch consumed (see the ‘Weighed food record’ section).

Communal eating is a common practice in this area; therefore the number of children who shared meals with the index child was obtained and used as a divisor to obtain an estimated quantity of food consumed by the index child. In such situations, equal sharing of food was assumed. The weight of the various ingredients consumed by the child was obtained by multiplying the weight of ingredients used in cooking the food by the proportion of total prepared food consumed by the index child.

Weighed food record

In the two schools participating in the SFP, lunch was consumed by the children at school and was usually served by the kitchen staff before 12.00 hours. Therefore, weighed food records were collected from Monday to Friday to assess the food and nutrient intakes from the school lunch. For the 20 % of children who had a repeated 24 hR, a second weighed food record was collected on a non-consecutive day to match their day of repeated 24 hR. Weighed food records were collected on days preceding the scheduled 24 hR for each child. All raw ingredients used in preparing the school lunch for a particular day were weighed using a digital kitchen scale (HD-801 model; Yuyao Fuming Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd), precise to 1 g and a maximum capacity of 3 kg. Bulk food ingredients were weighed using a platform scale (Camry FD-250; Zhongshan Camry Electronic Co., Ltd), precise to 500 g and a maximum capacity of 250 kg. The weight of the total food cooked, the quantity served to each child and the quantity left over from each child's meal (when applicable) were determined to derive the proportion consumed by the child from the total dish prepared at school. Sharing of meals with peers was not a problem as all children in participating schools received the school lunch. All other meals not consumed in school were considered as home consumption for SFP participants, while all meals consumed were considered as home consumption for non-SFP participants.

Anthropometric measurements

The weight and height of children were measured according to standard procedures( Reference Cogill 20 , 21 ). Weight was measured precise to 0·1 kg with an electronic scale (Uniscale; Seca GmbH). A known weight (20 kg) was used to calibrate the scale on each measurement day. A microtoise (Bodymeter 208; Seca GmbH) was used to measure the height of children precise to 0·1 cm. For both weight and height, an average of two measurements was taken. The ages of children were determined using the date of birth (from a verifiable document) and the date of measurement. In the absence of verifiable documents, parents/caregivers estimated the age based on another child's records or an event on the traditional calendar.

Blood sample collection

From each child, venous blood (6 ml) was drawn through venepuncture. One-third (2 ml) of the whole blood was transferred into EDTA-coated vacutainers (Becton-Dickinson Diagnostics) and used for the determination of Hb concentration on the same day. The remaining 4 ml of blood was stored in a plain tube without anticoagulant at ambient temperature. Serum was separated at room temperature at 500  g for 10 min (Hettich GmbH) and stored at − 80°C (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Serum samples were transported on dry ice to Germany via The Netherlands for the analysis of serum ferritin (SF), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) and C-reactive protein (CRP).

Data analysis

Household hunger score

Following the standard coding, each of the three items in the HHS was coded 0, 1 or 2 corresponding to hunger frequencies of ‘never’, ‘rarely or sometimes’ or ‘often’. This yielded total scores ranging from 0 to 6 based on which households were categorised into three standard groups: 1 = little/no household hunger (HHS ≤ 1); 2 = moderate household hunger (HHS 2–3); 3 = severe household hunger (HHS = 4–6)( Reference Ballard, Coates and Swindale 17 ).

Food composition and nutrient intake calculation

The calculation of nutrient intake was based on a food composition database primarily created using nutrient values from the West African Food Composition Table (WAFCT)( Reference Stadlmayr, Charrondiere and Enujiugha 22 ). In case of missing foods (twenty-one of 138 foods), the following food composition tables were used in the order indicated: Mali Food Composition Table( Reference Barikmo, Ouattara and Oshaug 23 ); the United States Department of Agriculture National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference( 24 ); the Ghana Food Composition Table( Reference Eyeson and Ankrah 25 ). When food values were taken from the Ghana Food Composition Table, values of missing nutrients (vitamins and some minerals) were updated with those of close substitutes from the WAFCT. Phytate values were taken from the International Minilist( Reference Calloway and Murphy 26 ). For Corn Soy Blend Plus (CSB+) consumed under SFP, nutrient content values were obtained from the World Food Programme( 27 ). Where appropriate, yield( Reference Stadlmayr, Charrondiere and Enujiugha 22 ) and nutrient retention factors( 24 , Reference Vásquez-Caicedo, Bell and Hartmann 28 ) were applied to account for nutrient losses during cooking before computing nutrient intake values. The Atwater general factors for carbohydrate, protein and fat and the recommended metabolisable energy value for dietary fibre in an ordinary diet (8·4 kJ/g) were used for calculating energy intake( 29 ). Total vitamin A (retinol activity equivalent) was calculated as the sum of retinol and 1/12 β-carotene( Reference Stadlmayr, Charrondiere and Enujiugha 22 ). The food consumption data were analysed using the VBS Food Calculation System, version 4 (BaS Nutrition Software). Using the National Research Council method, data on dietary intake from the 24 hR were adjusted for day-to-day variations to obtain the estimated usual intake values for the children( 30 ). Individual foods were categorised into thirteen food groups( Reference Stadlmayr, Charrondiere and Enujiugha 22 ). Due to implausible dietary intake (energy intake >20 000 kJ), thirty-one (8 %) children were not included in the dietary intake analysis.

Energy and nutrient intake adequacy calculation

Estimated energy requirement was calculated separately for each child by multiplying the estimated energy requirement per kg body weight per d by the child's weight assuming a moderate physical activity level( 31 ). Similarly, sex- and age-specific safe levels of protein intake/kg body weight per·d were multiplied by the weight of the child to determine the safe levels of protein intake for each child( 32 ). To assess the prevalence of adequate or inadequate intake, each child's adjusted energy and protein intake values were compared with their respective calculated requirements.

The probabilities of adequacy (PA) for vitamins A, C, B12 and folate, Zn and Ca were calculated using their respective estimated average requirement and distribution values( 33 35 ). Because the distribution of Fe requirement is skewed, we used the PA values derived by the Institute of Medicine( 33 ), but adjusted them for 5 % bioavailability to reflect the inhibitory nature of the predominantly cereal-based diet in rural northern Ghana. Similarly, the estimated average requirement for Zn was adjusted for low (15 %) bioavailability( 36 ). The mean probability of adequacy, a summary measure of micronutrient adequacy, was computed from PA of all the seven micronutrients investigated in the study.

Anthropometry

Anthropometric Z-scores were calculated using AnthroPlus (version 1.0.3; WHO). Underweight, stunting and thinness were defined as weight-for-age, height-for-age and BMI-for-age Z-scores < − 2 sd, respectively( Reference Cogill 20 , 21 ).

Biochemical analysis

The cyanmethaemoglobin method (using a colorimeter) was used to measure the Hb concentration of schoolchildren( Reference Zwart, van Assendelft and Bull 37 ). Measurements of serum parameters (ferritin, sTfR and CRP) were done in an accredited laboratory (Labor Centrum Nordhorn, Nordhorn, Germany). The concentration of ferritin was measured using the ElectroChemiLuminescence Immunoassay on a Roche E170 clinical analyser (Roche Diagnostics) with intra-assay and inter-assay variations of 2–5 %. The concentration of sTfR was measured using the Ramco ELISA kit (Ramco Laboratories, Inc.) with intra-assay and inter-assay variations ranging from 5 to 8 %. Turbidimetry was used to measure CRP on a Beckman Coulter Synchron clinical analyser (Beckman Coulter) with combined intra-assay and inter-assay variations ranging from 1·6 to 3·5 %.

Anaemia was defined as Hb concentrations < 115 g/l for children aged < 12 years and as concentrations < 120 g/l for children aged ≥ 12 years. Fe deficiency (ID) was defined as SF concentrations < 15 μg/l and/or sTfR concentrations >8·5 mg/l (Ramco Laboratories, Inc.) and Fe-deficiency anaemia (IDA) as concurrent anaemia with ID. Inflammation was defined as CRP concentrations >10 mg/l. Body Fe concentration was calculated using Cook's formula( Reference Cook, Flowers and Skikne 38 ).

Statistical analysis

Data entry was done using Epi Info for Windows version 3.2.1 (CDC). Data cleaning and analysis were done in SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc.) and SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc.). The distribution of data was checked by visual examination of Q–Q plots and normal-curve-fitted histograms and also tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Nutrient and Fe status variables that were not normally distributed were log-transformed and the transformed variables were used in subsequent analysis. ANOVA was used to generate a within-person day-to-day variance component, which was used to adjust energy and nutrient intakes.

Descriptive statistics were computed for background and household characteristics of children, and Pearson's χ2 test and independent-samples t test were used to test between-group differences in proportions and means, respectively. ANCOVA was used to test differences in the mean adjusted nutrient intake and Hb concentration values as well as serum Fe parameters between the two groups while controlling for age, household size and nutritional status (BMI-for-age Z score; BAZ). Differences in the prevalence of anaemia, inflammation, ID, IDA and inadequate nutrient intakes between the two groups were checked using Cox regression( Reference Barros and Hirakata 39 , Reference Coutinho, Scazufca and Menezes 40 ). Where appropriate, child and household characteristics were included in the regression model as covariates. In all analyses, P< 0·05 was the default value for an outcome to be considered statistically significant.

Results

Background characteristics of schoolchildren

Characteristic of the study area, more than 55 % of the children in both school feeding and non-school feeding groups were boys. The average age of children in both groups was 8·5 (sd 2) years; however, SFP participants were, on average, 6 months older than non-SFP participants (P =0·007). There was no significant difference in the proportion of children who were reported ill during the 2 weeks preceding the survey between the two groups (P= 0·257). Household size was larger for SFP participants than for non-SFP participants (P< 0·001). More than half of the children in both groups were from polygamous households. There was no difference in the proportion of households that reported moderate or severe hunger between the two groups (P= 0·434). In both groups, the majority of parents/caregivers were illiterate and engaged in farming as their main occupation (Table 1).

Table 1 Background characteristics of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants in northern Ghana (Mean values, standard deviations and percentages)

Food consumption patterns at home and school

At home, the three main meals served to children in both groups consisted of maize porridge (koko) with or without sugar served as breakfast and tuo zaafi – a thick/stiff maize porridge – served as lunch and dinner with varying vegetable soups. At the time of the survey (post-harvest season), the most dominant soup consumed by more than 50 % of the children consisted of dried powdered okra with or without groundnut paste/groundnut flour. When available, green leaves such as amaranth, Hibiscus sabdariffa and baobab (fresh and dried) were also used to prepare the soups accompanying tuo zaafi. A key ingredient of the soups, among all households, was powdered amani (small dried whole fish also known as anchovies, eaten with bones).

For SFP participants, school lunch was more varied and based on a menu. The menu was generally planned around three main food items: rice; cowpea; multiple-micronutrient-fortified corn soya blend (CSB+ from the World Food Programme). Eggs, meat and fish were served at least once a week, while oranges were served twice a week. The following dishes were prepared with these food items: jollof rice (rice cooked in tomato sauce); waakye (rice and cowpeas cooked together and served with tomato sauce); gari and beans (roasted cassava grits and boiled cowpeas usually served with palm oil); tuo zaafi or gable (both prepared from CSB+).

Energy and nutrient intakes and their adequacies among schoolchildren

The median intakes of energy, macronutrients and selected minerals and vitamins were higher among SFP participants than among non-SFP participants (P< 0·001) and remained higher after controlling for child and household covariates. Whereas the contribution of fat to total energy intake was significantly higher among SFP participants (20 v. 16 %; P< 0·001), the contribution of carbohydrate to total energy intake was significantly higher among non-SFP participants (64 v. 65 %; P< 0·01). Even though the contribution of protein to total energy intake was similar (12 %) between the two groups, the proportion of total protein intake from animal sources, a measure of protein quality, was greater among SFP participants than among non-SFP participants (5 v. 3 %; P< 0·001). However, there was no difference (P= 0·268) in the proportion of total Fe intake from animal sources (meat, fish and poultry) between the two groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Energy, nutrient and phytate intakes of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants in northern Ghana (Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

RAE, retinol activity equivalent.

* Meat, fish, eggs and milk.

Meat and fish.

The proportion of SFP participants with energy intake below the requirement was significantly lower than that of non-SFP participants (4·7 v. 21·8 %; P< 0·001). However, none of the children in both groups had intake below the requirement for protein. The PA for Fe, Zn, Ca, and vitamins A and C, and folate were significantly higher (P< 0·001) among SFP participants than among non-SFP participants, with a mean PA of 0·61 (sd 0·13) among SFP participants compared with 0·18 (sd 0·11) among non-SFP participants (Table 3).

Table 3 Proportion of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants with values below the estimated average requirement for energy and protein and probabilities of adequacy for selected micronutrients (Mean values and standard deviations)

NA, not applicable.

* Computed from the PA values of micronutrients.

Home consumption and the contribution of school lunch to energy and nutrient intakes

There was no difference in energy, fat, carbohydrate, Ca, vitamin C and phytate intakes from home consumption between the two groups of children (P>0·05). Home intake was significantly higher among non-SFP participants for protein (P =0·041), Fe (P =0·011), Zn (P= 0·005) and vitamin A (P= 0·005). For energy, macronutrients and selected minerals, 22–37 % of the daily intake was contributed by the school lunch served to SFP participants. For vitamins A and C, however, >90 % of the daily intake was contributed by the school lunch (Table 4). The school lunch provided approximately 418 kJ more energy than home lunch (P< 0·001) and about 2 g more protein (18 (sd 1) v. 16 (sd 3) g; P< 0·001). The contribution of school lunch to the estimated average requirement for energy among SFP participants was significantly greater than that of home lunch among non-SFP participants, i.e. 37 (sd 7) v. 31 (sd 8) %; P <0·001. However, the contribution of school lunch to daily protein requirement among SFP participants did not differ from that among non-SFP participants, i.e. 88 (sd 17) v. 84 (sd 26) %; P= 0·096.

Table 4 Difference in home consumption between school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants and the contribution of school lunch to nutrient intakes among SFP participants (Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

RAE, retinol activity equivalent.

* Including foods bought outside home and consumed by children.

Relative contribution of individual foods and food groups to energy and nutrient intakes

In Fig. 1, the five topmost individual foods contributing to ≥ 70 % of the intake of energy, selected nutrients and anti-nutrients related to Fe absorption are shown. Except for vitamin C, maize was the main source of intake of total energy and selected nutrients. The relative contribution of maize to the intake of energy and selected nutrients ranged from 43 to 70 % for non-SFP participants and from 30 to 60 % for SFP participants. Cowpeas and corn soya blend (CSB+ from the World Food Programme) were additional sources of energy and nutrient intakes for SFP participants.

Fig. 1 The top five foods contributing to (a) energy, (b) protein, (c) iron, (d) zinc, (e) vitamin C and (f) phytate intakes among school feeding programme (SFP, ■) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP, ) participants in northern Ghana. CSB+, Corn Soya Blend Plus; dawadawa, local condiment made from fermented African locust bean (Parkia biglobosa seeds); HS, Hibiscus sabdariffa.

For both groups of children, the main food groups that contributed to dietary intake were cereals (maize, rice and sorghum), vegetables (dried okra and green leaves), nuts (groundnuts) and fish (amani). Food groups such as meat, eggs and fruits were rarely consumed by non-SFP participants (Fig. 2). SFP participants received meat at school twice a week, but the average quantity per serving was < 10 g/d. The overall dietary diversity (number of different food groups consumed out of the thirteen food groups) among SFP participants was greater than that among non-SFP participants, i.e. 8·5 (sd 0·9) v. 6·2 (sd 1·1); P< 0·001.

Fig. 2 Proportion of school feeding programme (SFP, ■) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP, ) participants in northern Ghana consuming foods from thirteen food groups.

Eating moments and portion sizes of meals of schoolchildren

Almost all children in both groups ate during each of the three main eating moments per d: breakfast; lunch; dinner. Whereas a higher proportion of SFP children consumed a meal before the main breakfast meal (36 v. 25 %; P= 0·018), the reverse was true for children who ate a meal before lunch (13 v. 40 %; P< 0·001). Compared with only 20 % of the non-SFP children, almost every SFP child consumed a meal before the main dinner meal. For SFP participants, the meal before the main dinner meal could best be described as a second lunch (Fig. 3) after the school lunch. On the average, SFP participants had about one more eating moment (meal) compared with non-SFP participants (4·5 v. 3·8; P< 0·001).

Fig. 3 Proportion of school feeding programme (SFP, ■) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP, ) participants in northern Ghana who ate meals across the six daily eating moments.

Except for ‘lunch’ and the meal ‘before dinner’, the average portion sizes of meals during all other eating moments in a day were similar between SFP participants and non-SFP participants (data not shown). The median portion size of lunch for non-SFP participants (which was taken at home) was significantly greater than that for SFP participants (which was taken at school), i.e. 1037 v. 456 g; P< 0·001. Conversely, the median portion size of the meal ‘before dinner’ was significantly greater for SFP participants than for non-participants, i.e. 962 v. 508 g; P< 0·001. The caregivers of SFP participants indicated that even though their children ate lunch at school, they still served them the lunch that was prepared at home. It should be noted that the portion size of the meal before dinner for SFP participants is similar to the portion size of the home lunch for non-SFP participants.

Iron and nutritional status of schoolchildren

The mean Hb concentration of children was 100 (sd 16) g/l. SFP participants had 6 g/l higher Hb concentration than non-SFP participants (P< 0·001) even after controlling for household and child characteristics. There was no difference in the concentration of SF between the two groups. The concentration of sTfR was significantly lower among SFP participants than among non-SFP participants (P= 0·04). There was no difference in the calculated body Fe store between the two groups (P =0·08). There was no difference in the mean concentration of CRP and the proportion of children with inflammation between the two groups. The prevalence of anaemia was marginally lower (P =0·06) in SFP participants, while there was no significant difference in the prevalence of ID and IDA between the two groups. SFP participants were about 3 cm taller; however, the difference was not significant after controlling for age differences. Weight-for-age and height-for-age Z-scores were similar between the two groups. BMI-for-age Z-score was significantly higher for non-SFP participants (P =0·008). There was no difference in the prevalence of underweight, stunting and thinness between the two groups (Table 5).

Table 5 Iron and nutritional status of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants in northern Ghana (Mean values and standard deviations; geometric means and interquartile ranges (IQR))

SF, serum ferritin; CRP, C-reactive protein; sTfR, soluble transferrin receptor; ID, Fe-deficiency; IDA, Fe-deficiency anaemia.

* Adjusted for background difference between the groups.

n 175 for the SFP group and 161 for the non-SFP group.

To convert body Fe from mg/kg to mmol/kg multiply by 0·0171( Reference Troesch, van Stuijvenberg and Smuts 74 ).

§ Defined as anaemia and SF concentrations < 15 μg/l and/or sTfR concentrations >8·5 mg/l.

AnthroPlus software (version 1.0.3; WHO) allows weight-for-age calculation only for children aged 5–10 years old (n 136 for the SFP group and 139 for the non-SFP group).

Discussion

In the present study, we compared the energy and nutrient intakes and Fe and nutritional status of children in school feeding and non-school feeding schools. Energy and nutrient intakes and their adequacies were significantly higher among the school feeding participants than among the non-participants. However, there were no differences in the prevalence of Fe status indicators, underweight, stunting and thinness between the two groups.

The significantly higher intake of energy and nutrients among the school feeding participants is attributable to the supplementary effect of school meals( Reference Powell, Walker and Chang 41 Reference Preston, Venegas and Rodríguez 45 ) and superior energy density of the school lunch( Reference Harding, Marquis and Colecraft 43 ). The school lunch was served before 12.00 hours, so children were probably hungry again by the time school closed at 14.00 hours and therefore were still able to eat a late lunch served at home. However, a different study has reported that school feeding rather replaces home consumption( Reference Martens 46 ). The school lunch also increased the diversity of meals of participating children, which has been shown to be related to increased quality and quantity of nutrient intakes in other studies( Reference Ferguson, Gibson and Opareobisaw 47 Reference Torheim, Barikmo and Parr 51 ). In both groups, all children met their safe levels of intake for protein. However, the biological value of the protein may be low, given that only an average of 4 % is animal source protein and cereal protein is limiting in growth-supporting lysine. Even though we did not adjust for protein quality( Reference Blackburn and Southgate 52 , Reference Beaton, Calloway and Murphy 53 ), the digestibility of the protein may also be compromised given the high concentration of dietary fibre in the meals of both groups of children( Reference Blackburn and Southgate 52 ).

A few food items contributed to the better micronutrient intake among the school feeding participants: orange for vitamin C; fortified corn soya blend for Fe and vitamins A and C; palm oil for vitamin A. The multiple-micronutrient-fortified corn soya blend, in particular, appears to play a key role in increasing micronutrient intake and adequacy among the school feeding participants. This may thus indicate that adequate micronutrient intake may not be achieved by the mere provision of an extra meal through school lunch, but achieved by deliberate supply of micronutrient-dense foods( Reference Bundy, Burbano and Grosh 3 , Reference Alderman and Bundy 54 ). However, the bioavailability of the relatively higher amounts of Fe and Zn consumed among SFP participants may be reduced given the high phytate content of the diet in general( Reference Hurrell, Reddy and Juillerat 55 ) and the meagre contribution of animal protein to total dietary intake( Reference Hallberg, Bjorn-Rasmussen and Howard 56 ). Moreover, the oranges that were served (twice a week) with lunch, which could improve Fe bioavailability when consumed together with the school lunch( Reference Cook and Reddy 57 , Reference Teucher, Olivares and Cori 58 ), were rather taken home and often shared with younger siblings not in school. In the absence of school feeding, the probability of adequate micronutrient intake among schoolchildren is low (approximately 0·20). This to a large extent reflects the poor quality of diets at the household level as almost all meals consumed by the non-school feeding children were from home. In other studies, the micronutrient quality of cereal- and legume-based diets of rural African households has been reported to be poor and to contribute to the inadequate intake of bioavailable Fe( Reference Mitchikpe, Dossa and Ategbo 59 , Reference Neumann, Bwibo and Murphy 60 ).

The measurement of habitual dietary intake of individuals and groups remains a major challenge in dietary intake assessment( Reference RS and EL 18 ), but our use of 24 hR with a non-consecutive duplicate recall in a subsample has been recommended and shown to be adequate for such a measurement( Reference RS and EL 18 , Reference Murphy and Poos 61 , Reference Kigutha 62 ) and for the assessment of nutrient intake of schoolchildren( Reference Murphy, Gewa and Liang 63 ). Major sources of systematic bias in the use of 24 hR include under- or over-reporting of intake( Reference RS and EL 18 , Reference Margetts and Nelson 64 ), which could have resulted in the misclassification of nutrient intake adequacy. To minimise misreporting of food intake, mothers/caregivers were taken through a systematic multiple-pass procedure which aided recollection of foods and ingredients used in preparation of meals at home( Reference RS and EL 18 ). Out-of-home food intake may have been omitted by mothers/caregivers and may have led to an underestimation of nutrient intake( Reference Gewa, Murphy and Neumann 19 ). However, in this area, almost all meals are prepared and consumed at home and mothers/caregivers are fully involved in serving meals. Also, the presence of children during the interviews helped mother/caregivers to recall likely forgotten foods. We therefore believe that underestimation of nutrient intake was unlikely to have occurred.

The high prevalence of anaemia among these children is not unexpected. The study area is malaria endemic and malaria is among the leading causes of anaemia( Reference Ehrhardt, Burchard and Mantel 14 ) in this area. As the present study was conducted during the peak of malaria transmission (November–December), it is most likely that malaria contributed to the high prevalence of anaemia among these children( Reference Abizari, Moretti and Zimmermann 65 ). Notwithstanding the apparent contribution of malaria to anaemia, the high prevalence of IDA among these children may indicate that anaemia in a large proportion of these children is due to ID. The low prevalence of ID observed based on SF values alone rather than when combined with sTfR values highlights the difficulty of reliably measuring ID prevalence in settings where the prevalence of infections and infestations may be high. In an intervention trial in the same area, Abizari et al. found that baseline SF values (similar to the SF values observed in the present study) decreased in response to deworming and malaria treatment, thus giving credence to the use of sTfR values as the measure of Fe status in the present study. However, the low prevalence of elevated CRP (an acute-phase protein) among these children does not seem to indicate that SF values in the present study were possibly influenced by inflammation. Unlike CRP, α1-acid glycoprotein values increase and return to baseline values slowly( Reference Feelders, Vreugdenhil and Eggermont 66 ) and therefore it may be better to measure the concentrations of both CRP and α1-acid glycoprotein as composite markers of cross-sectional inflammation( Reference Abizari, Moretti and Zimmermann 65 , Reference Ayoya, Spiekermann-Brouwer and Stoltzfus 67 , 68 ), but the concentration of α1-acid glycoprotein was not measured in the present study.

It is tempting to suggest that the higher Hb concentration, better sTfR concentration and the relatively lower prevalence of anaemia among SFP participants may be associated with the overall better Fe content of the school lunch. However, the absence of a significant difference in SF and body Fe concentrations between the two groups coupled with a similar prevalence of ID and IDA does not support the observation that SFP may have contributed to Fe status. Fe status may also be influenced by non-dietary interventions. Health- and nutrition-related interventions associated with SFP, such as deworming, could have also contributed to the relatively better Hb and sTfR concentrations( Reference Adelman, Gilligan and Lehrer 4 ), but neither group of schools reported receiving deworming treatments in the 6 months preceding the study. In a randomised trial in the same area, it has been shown that school feeding coupled with deworming and malaria treatment significantly improves Hb concentrations and Fe status and reduces anaemia prevalence( Reference Abizari, Moretti and Zimmermann 65 ).

Contrary to our expectation, the higher energy and nutrient intakes among SFP participants did not result in a significant difference in nutritional status. The lack of effect of school feeding on nutritional status has also been observed elsewhere( Reference Danquah, Amoah and Steiner-Asiedu 69 , Reference Meme, Kogi-Makau and Muroki 70 ), and the main reason for the lack of effect has been ascribed to the substitution effect of SFP. In the present study, the reason for the lack of differences in nutritional status despite the absence of home lunch substitution remains unclear as further exploration was limited by the study design. Others have argued that SFP targeting children >2 years are unlikely to affect stunting in particular( Reference Bryce, Coitinho and Darnton-Hill 12 ). In settings where stunting prevalence is already high, there is increasing fear that the excess energy intake due to SFP could lead to obesity( Reference Black, Allen and Bhutta 1 ). The basis for such fear was not apparent in the present study. However, it is possible that the higher energy and nutrient intakes among SFP participants increased their activity levels at the expense of weight gains( Reference Grillenberger, Neumann and Murphy 71 ). Based on the differences between the estimated energy requirements for children and the adjusted energy intakes, it was found that a majority of the schoolchildren in both groups were in positive energy balance, but there was no evidence of positive energy balance in the nutritional status of the schoolchildren. On the other hand, it is also possible that the schoolchildren were more physically active and thus required more energy than what we estimated using a moderate physical activity level. The positive energy balance could have also been a result of caregivers overestimating the dietary intake of their children. However, if overestimation occurred, it is less likely to have affected the differences observed in nutrient intakes between the two groups as total energy intake from home consumption was not significantly different.

The evidence of the impact of SFP (e.g. government-run SFP) has been described as lacking rigour because of their non-experimental design( Reference Adelman, Gilligan and Lehrer 4 ). The design of the present study is also non-experimental, thus limiting the rigour of the inferences that can be drawn. The absence of measures of nutrient intakes and Fe and nutritional status for both groups at the start of the SFP and the non-random allocation of the pilot SFP did not allow us to isolate the impact of school lunch, even though we controlled for differences in child and household characteristics in the analysis. We matched SFP communities with non-SFP communities that were otherwise also qualified to receive school feeding, but were not enrolled at the time of the study. We examined our assumptions that intervention communities had starting status similar to their controls by comparing the outcomes of interest between all four SFP–non-SFP pairs (2 SFP × 2 non-SFP) to determine whether differences were consistently in favour of SFP. We observed consistent differences in favour of school feeding with respect to energy and nutrient intakes but not with respect to Fe and nutritional status, indicating that our assumption for similarity may not be strongly supported. However, it is possible that the paired comparisons lacked power to detect the consistent direction of effect because sample sizes were half of what the present study was powered for. Moreover, unobservable differences between communities may have altered the effects attributable to SFP( Reference Ahmed 72 ). It is recommended that studies that match schools to evaluate the effects of SFP include a large number of schools to account for differences in school and community characteristics( Reference Grantham-McGregor 73 ). It therefore remains a limitation of the present study that only two pairs of schools could be matched and included.

In conclusion, the present results indicate that school feeding is associated with higher intakes and adequacies of energy and nutrients, but not with the prevalence of Fe and nutritional status indicators. The results also indicate an important role for micronutrient-dense foods in the achievement of micronutrient adequacy within SFP.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the following teachers for their cooperation during the survey: Y. Abdul-Majeed (Wayamba primary school); A. Alaru (Wayamba primary school); A. A. Suhuyini (Jagbo primary school); I. Norgah (Tibung primary school); S. Inusah (Kpalgung primary school). They also thank L. van der Heijden (deceased) for her technical support during the training of research assistants and R. K. Adatsi of the Tamale Teaching Hospital for his technical support during blood sample collection and measurement of Hb concentration. A.-R. A., I. D. B. and M. A.-K designed the study; A.-R. A., C. B. and V. L. K. conducted and supervised fieldwork; M. A.-K., J. M.-H. and I. D. B. supervised field work; A.-R. A., C. B. and V. L. K. processed dietary data; A.-R. A. and I. D. B. analysed data; A.-R. A. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors edited and approved the final version of the manuscript. The present study was supported by the Interdisciplinary Research and Education Fund of Wageningen University through the Tailoring Food Sciences to Endogenous Patterns of Local Food Supply for Future Nutrition Project.

References

1 Black, RE, Allen, LH, Bhutta, ZA, et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 371, 243260.Google Scholar
2 UNICEF (1990) Strategy for Improved Nutrition. New York, NY: United Nations Children's Fund.Google Scholar
3 Bundy, D, Burbano, C, Grosh, M, et al. (2009) Rethinking School Feeding: Social Safety Nets, Child Development, and the Education Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
4 Adelman, SW, Gilligan, DO & Lehrer, K (2008) How Effective are Food for Education Programs?: A Critical Assessment of the Evidence from Developing Countries (Food Policy Review 9). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
5 UNMP (2005) Halving Hunger: It Can Be Done. Summary Version of the Report of the Task Force on Hunger. UN Millennium Project. New York, NY: The Earth Institute at Columbia University.Google Scholar
6 NEPAD (2005) Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP) Summary for the Southern Africa Regional Implementation Planning Meeting. Maputo: NEPAD Secretariat.Google Scholar
7 GoG (2006) GSFP Programme Document: 2007–2010. Accra: Government of Ghana (GoG), Ghana School Feeding Programme (GSFP) Secretariat.Google Scholar
8 Kristjansson, EA, Robinson, V, Petticrew, M, et al. (2007) School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged elementary school children. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, issue 1 CD004676.Google Scholar
9 Buttenheim, A, Alderman, H & Friedman, J (2011) Impact evaluation of school feeding programmes in Lao People's Democratic Republic. J Dev Effect 3, 520542.Google Scholar
10 Adelman, SW, Alderman, H, Gilligan, DO, et al. (2008) The Impact of Alternative Food for Education Programs on Child Nutrition in Northern Uganda (Working Paper). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
11 Kazianga, H, de Walque, D & Alderman, H (2008) Educational and Health Impact of Two School Feeding Schemes: Evidence from a Randomized Trial in Rural Burkina Faso. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
12 Bryce, J, Coitinho, D, Darnton-Hill, I, et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: effective action at national level. Lancet 371, 510526.Google Scholar
13 TKDA (2007) Tolon/Kumbungu District Profile. Tolon: Tolon/Kumbungu District Assembly (TKDA).Google Scholar
14 Ehrhardt, S, Burchard, GD, Mantel, C, et al. (2006) Malaria, anemia, and malnutrition in African children – defining intervention priorities. J Infect Dis 194, 108114.Google Scholar
15 Owusu-Agyei, S, Koram, KA, Baird, JK, et al. (2001) Incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic Plasmodium falciparum infection following curative therapy in adult residents of northern Ghana. Am J Trop Med Hyg 65, 197203.Google Scholar
16 Deitchler, M, Ballard, T, Swindale, A, et al. (2010) Validation of a Measure of Household Hunger for Cross-Cultural Use. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance II Project (FANTA-2), AED.Google Scholar
17 Ballard, T, Coates, J, Swindale, A, et al. (2011) Household Hunger Scale: Indicator Definition and Measurement Guide. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance II Project (FANTA-2) Bridge, FHI 360.Google Scholar
18 RS, Gibson and EL, Ferguson (editors) (2008) An Interactive 24-Hour Recall for Assessing the Adequacy of Iron and Zinc Intakes in Developing Countries. HarvestPlus, Washington, DC and Cali: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT).Google Scholar
19 Gewa, CA, Murphy, SP & Neumann, CG (2007) Out-of-home food intake is often omitted from mothers' recalls of school children's intake in rural Kenya. J Nutr 137, 21542159.Google Scholar
20 Cogill, B (2003) Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide. Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development.Google Scholar
21 WHO (1995) Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 854, 1452.Google Scholar
22 Stadlmayr, B, Charrondiere, UR, Enujiugha, VN, et al. (2012) West African Food Composition Table. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
23 Barikmo, I, Ouattara, F & Oshaug, A (2004) Food Composition Table for Mali. TACAM, Research Series no. 9 . Oslo: Akershus University College.Google Scholar
24 USDA (2007) Table of Nutrient Retention Factors. Release No. 6. Nutrient Data Laboratory. Beltsville, MD: Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
25 Eyeson, KK & Ankrah, EK (1975) Composition of Foods Commonly Used in Ghana. Accra: Food Research Institute, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.Google Scholar
26 Calloway, DH & Murphy, SP (1994) World Food Dietary Assessment System: International Minilist. Berkely: University of California.Google Scholar
27 WFP (2011) Technical Specifications for the Manufacture of: Corn Soya Blend for Young Children and Adults – CSB Plus. Rome: WFP. http://foodquality.wfp.org/FoodSpecifications/BlendedFoodsFortified/CSBPlusWFP/tabid/139/Default.aspx (accessed accessed 27 August 2012).Google Scholar
28 Vásquez-Caicedo, AL, Bell, S & Hartmann, B (2008) Report on Collection of Rules on Use of Recipe Calculation Procedures Including the Use of Yield and Retention Factors for Imputing Nutrient Values for Composite Foods (D2.2.9). Brussels: EuroFIR. http://www.eurofir.net/compiler_network/guidelines/recipe_calculation (accessed accessed August 2012).Google Scholar
29 FAO (2003) Food Energy – Methods of Analysis and Conversion Factors. Report of a Technical Workshop (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 77). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
30 NRC (1986) Nutrient Adequacy: Assessment Using Food Consumption Surveys. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/618.html (accessed accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
31 FAO/WHO/UNU (2004) Human Energy Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation (FAO Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series no. 1). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
32 FAO/WHO/UNU (2007) Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation (WHO Technical Report Series no. 935). Geneva: FAO/WHO/UNU.Google Scholar
33 IOM (2001) Dietary reference intakes for vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium and zinc. In Dietary Reference Intakes. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10026.html (accessed accessed August 2012).Google Scholar
34 IOM (2011) Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
35 IOM (1998) Dietary reference intakes for thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, pantothenic acid, biotin, and choline. In Dietary Reference Intakes. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/6015.html (accessed accessed August 2012).Google Scholar
36 WHO/FAO (2004) Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition, 2nd ed. Geneva/Rome: WHO/FAO.Google Scholar
37 Zwart, A, van Assendelft, OW, Bull, BS, et al. (1996) Recommendations for reference method for haemoglobinometry in human blood (ICSH standard 1995) and specifications for international haemoglobinocyanide standard (4th edition). J Clin Pathol 49, 271274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Cook, JD, Flowers, CH & Skikne, BS (2003) The quantitative assessment of body iron. Blood 101, 33593364.Google Scholar
39 Barros, AJ & Hirakata, VN (2003) Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 3, 2131.Google Scholar
40 Coutinho, LMS, Scazufca, M & Menezes, PR (2008) Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in crosssectional studies. Rev Saude Publica 42, 16.Google Scholar
41 Powell, CA, Walker, SP, Chang, SM, et al. (1998) Nutrition and education: a randomized trial of the effects of breakfast in rural primary school children. Am J Clin Nutr 68, 873879.Google Scholar
42 Walker, SP, Powell, CA, Hutchinson, SE, et al. (1998) Schoolchildren's diets and participation in school feeding programmes in Jamaica. Public Health Nutr 1, 4349.Google Scholar
43 Harding, KB, Marquis, GS, Colecraft, EK, et al. (2012) Participation in communal day care centre feeding programs is associated with higher diet quantity but not quality among rural Ghanaian children. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 12, 58025821.Google Scholar
44 Gewa, CA, Murphy, SP, Weiss, RE, et al. (2013) A school-based supplementary food programme in rural Kenya did not reduce children's intake at home. Public Health Nutr 1, 18.Google Scholar
45 Preston, AM, Venegas, H, Rodríguez, CA, et al. (2013) Assessment of the National School Lunch Program in a subset of schools in San Juan, Puerto Rico: participants vs. non-participants. PR Health Sci J 32, 2535.Google Scholar
46 Martens, T (2007) Impact of the Ghana School Feeding Programme in 4 districts in Central Region, Ghana. MSc Thesis, Wageningen University.Google Scholar
47 Ferguson, EL, Gibson, RS, Opareobisaw, C, et al. (1993) Seasonal food-consumption patterns and dietary diversity of rural preschool Ghanaian and Malawian children. Ecol Food Nutr 29, 219234.Google Scholar
48 Hatloy, A, Torheim, LE & Oshaug, A (1998) Food variety – a good indicator of nutritional adequacy of the diet? A case study from an urban area in Mali, West Africa. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 891898.Google Scholar
49 Foote, JA, Murphy, SP, Wilkens, LR, et al. (2004) Dietary variety increases the probability of nutrient adequacy among adults. J Nutr 134, 17791785.Google Scholar
50 Torheim, LE, Ouattara, F, Diarra, MM, et al. (2004) Nutrient adequacy and dietary diversity in rural Mali: association and determinants. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 594604.Google Scholar
51 Torheim, LE, Barikmo, I, Parr, CL, et al. (2003) Validation of food variety as an indicator of diet quality assessed with a food frequency questionnaire for Western Mali. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 12831291.Google Scholar
52 Blackburn, NA & Southgate, DAT (1981) Protein Digestibility and Absorption: Effects of Fibre, and the Extent of Individual Variability. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation on Energy and Protein Requirement. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
53 Beaton, GH, Calloway, DH & Murphy, SP (1992) Estimated protein intakes of toddlers – predicted prevalence of inadequate intakes in village populations in Egypt, Kenya, and Mexico. Am J Clin Nutr 55, 902911.Google Scholar
54 Alderman, H & Bundy, D (2012) School feeding programs and development: are we framing the question correctly? World Bank Res Obs 27, 204221.Google Scholar
55 Hurrell, RF, Reddy, MB, Juillerat, MA, et al. (2003) Degradation of phytic acid in cereal porridges improves iron absorption by human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 12131219.Google Scholar
56 Hallberg, L, Bjorn-Rasmussen, E, Howard, L, et al. (1979) Dietary heme iron absorption. A discussion of possible mechanisms for the absorption-promoting effect of meat and for the regulation of iron absorption. Scand J Gastroenterol 14, 769779.Google Scholar
57 Cook, JD & Reddy, MB (2001) Effect of ascorbic acid intake on nonheme-iron absorption from a complete diet. Am J Clin Nutr 73, 9398.Google Scholar
58 Teucher, B, Olivares, M & Cori, H (2004) Enhancers of iron absorption: ascorbic acid and other organic acids. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 74, 403419.Google Scholar
59 Mitchikpe, CE, Dossa, RA, Ategbo, EA, et al. (2009) Seasonal variation in food pattern but not in energy and nutrient intakes of rural Beninese school-aged children. Public Health Nutr 12, 414422.Google Scholar
60 Neumann, CG, Bwibo, NO, Murphy, SP, et al. (2003) Animal source foods improve dietary quality, micronutrient status, growth and cognitive function in Kenyan school children: background, study design and baseline findings. J Nutr 133, 3941S3949S.Google Scholar
61 Murphy, SP & Poos, MI (2002) Dietary reference intakes: summary of applications in dietary assessment. Public Health Nutr 5, 843849.Google Scholar
62 Kigutha, HN (1997) Assessment of dietary intake in rural communities in Africa: experiences in Kenya. Am J Clin Nutr 65, 1168S1172S.Google Scholar
63 Murphy, SP, Gewa, C, Liang, LJ, et al. (2003) School snacks containing animal source foods improve dietary quality for children in rural Kenya. J Nutr 133, 3950S3956S.Google Scholar
64 Margetts, B & Nelson, M (1997) Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
65 Abizari, AR, Moretti, D, Zimmermann, MB, et al. (2012) Whole cowpea meal fortified with NaFeEDTA reduces iron deficiency among Ghanaian school children in a malaria endemic area. J Nutr 142, 18361842.Google Scholar
66 Feelders, RA, Vreugdenhil, G, Eggermont, AMM, et al. (1998) Regulation of iron metabolism in the acute-phase response: interferon gamma and tumour necrosis factor alpha induce hypoferraemia, ferritin production and a decrease in circulating transferrin receptors in cancer patients. Eur J Clin Invest 28, 520527.Google Scholar
67 Ayoya, MA, Spiekermann-Brouwer, GM, Stoltzfus, RJ, et al. (2010) Alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein, hepcidin, C-reactive protein, and serum ferritin are correlated in anemic schoolchildren with Schistosoma haematobium . Am J Clin Nutr 91, 17841790.Google Scholar
68 WHO/CDC (2005) Assessing the Iron Status of Populations. Report of a Joint WHO/CDC Technical Consultation on the Assessment of Iron Status at the Population Level. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
69 Danquah, AO, Amoah, AN, Steiner-Asiedu, M, et al. (2012) Nutritional status of participating and non-participating pupils in the Ghana school feeding programme. J Food Res 1, 263271.Google Scholar
70 Meme, MM, Kogi-Makau, W, Muroki, NM, et al. (1998) Energy and protein intake and nutritional status of primary schoolchildren 5 to 10 years of age in schools with and without feeding programmes in Nyambene District, Kenya. Food Nutr Bull 19, 334342.Google Scholar
71 Grillenberger, M, Neumann, CG, Murphy, SP, et al. (2003) Food supplements have a positive impact on weight gain and the addition of animal source foods increases lean body mass of Kenyan schoolchildren. J Nutr 133, 3957S3964S.Google Scholar
72 Ahmed, AU (2004) Impact of Feeding Children in School: Evidence from Bangladesh. Washington, DC: Mimeo. International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
73 Grantham-McGregor, S (2005) School feeding, cognition and school achievement. In 18th International Congress of Nutrition. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
74 Troesch, B, van Stuijvenberg, ME, Smuts, CM, et al. (2011) A micronutrient powder with low doses of highly absorbable iron and zinc reduces iron and zinc deficiency and improves weight-for-age Z scores in South African children. J Nutr 141, 237242.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Background characteristics of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants in northern Ghana (Mean values, standard deviations and percentages)

Figure 1

Table 2 Energy, nutrient and phytate intakes of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants in northern Ghana (Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 2

Table 3 Proportion of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants with values below the estimated average requirement for energy and protein and probabilities of adequacy for selected micronutrients (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Table 4 Difference in home consumption between school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants and the contribution of school lunch to nutrient intakes among SFP participants (Median values and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 4

Fig. 1 The top five foods contributing to (a) energy, (b) protein, (c) iron, (d) zinc, (e) vitamin C and (f) phytate intakes among school feeding programme (SFP, ■) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP, ) participants in northern Ghana. CSB+, Corn Soya Blend Plus; dawadawa, local condiment made from fermented African locust bean (Parkia biglobosa seeds); HS, Hibiscus sabdariffa.

Figure 5

Fig. 2 Proportion of school feeding programme (SFP, ■) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP, ) participants in northern Ghana consuming foods from thirteen food groups.

Figure 6

Fig. 3 Proportion of school feeding programme (SFP, ■) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP, ) participants in northern Ghana who ate meals across the six daily eating moments.

Figure 7

Table 5 Iron and nutritional status of school feeding programme (SFP) and non-school feeding programme (non-SFP) participants in northern Ghana (Mean values and standard deviations; geometric means and interquartile ranges (IQR))