Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:43:19.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between maternal BMI, nutrient intakes and glycaemic control in third trimester of pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2012

V. Cairnduff
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
A. J. Hill
Affiliation:
Diabetes Research Group, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine, BT52 1SA, UK
M. Sinclair
Affiliation:
Nursing Research Institute, School of Nursing, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK
C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Epidemiology Research Group, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University BelfastBT12 6BJ, UK
D. R. McCance
Affiliation:
Regional Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, BT12 6BA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

The prevalence of obesity in pregnancy is increasing and is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as gestational diabetes( 1 ). This study examined the nutritional composition of diets of pregnant women in Belfast in the 3rd trimester in relation to maternal anthropometry. Pregnant women were participants in the Hyperglycaemic and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Study( 2 ) a prospective observational study which examined the relevance of minor degrees of maternal glycaemia to maternal fetal outcome. Diet was assessed using a validated self-administered food frequency questionnaire at an average of 29 weeks gestation. Mean daily nutrient intakes were analysed using nutritional software Q Builder Questionnaire Analysis System version 2.0 (Tinuviel Software, UK). Dietary intake data was available for 1639 women (97.7% of cohort). At approximately 28 weeks gestation, 415 (25.3%) participants were classed as overweight with BMI ≥28.5–32.9 kg/m2) and 235 (14.3%) as obese with BMI>33.0 kg/m2 ( 2 ). A Goldberg EI:BMR( Reference Goldberg, Black and Jebb 3 ) cut-off of 1.2 was used to assess the extent of under-reporting within the dataset and 768 (46.9%) participants with EI:BMR<1.2 were excluded from final analysis. A one-way ANOVA investigated differences in mean plasma glucose levels assessed at Oral Glucose Tolerance Test and mean daily macronutrient intakes between BMI categories. All measures of glycaemic control were significantly higher in overweight and obese pregnant women compared with normal weight women (Table 1). However, no significant differences in nutrient intakes between BMI categories were observed except mean sugar intake was significantly lower in overweight women compared with normal weight women (Table 2).

* Significantly different at P<0.05 level when compared to women with BMI within normal range

* Significantly different at P<0.05 level when compared to women with BMI within normal range.

Results indicate that plasma glucose levels are significantly higher in overweight and obese pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy, however there are no differences in nutrient intakes between women and BMI categories.

References

1. CMACE-RCOG (2010) Joint Guideline for management for women with Obesity in pregnancy. Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.Google Scholar
2. HAPO (2010) Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Study: associations with maternal body mass index. International Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology 117(5): 575–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Goldberg, GR, Black, AE, Jebb, SA, et al. (1991) Critical Evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-reporting European Journal Clinical Nutrition 45(12): 569–81.Google Scholar
Figure 0

*

Figure 1

*