Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:35:53.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moses Matanda. Eagles in the Hut. 2022. 57 minutes. English. Honde Valley TV, in conjunction with Nhaka TV Production. No price reported.

Review products

Moses Matanda. Eagles in the Hut. 2022. 57 minutes. English. Honde Valley TV, in conjunction with Nhaka TV Production. No price reported.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2024

Peter Junior Tshetu
Affiliation:
Eduvos, South Africa [email protected]
Solomon Bakare
Affiliation:
Eduvos, South Africa [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Film Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of African Studies Association

Eagles in the Hut is an emotionally laden story of “incestuous rape” and girl-child abuse. Incestuous rape is unlawful intentional sexual intercourse with one’s own blood relative without their legal or valid consent. The film is about a young teenage girl, Tariro, who suffers extensive sexual and physical abuse at the hands of her own biological father, James, and stepmother, Mai James. The director, Moses Matanda, unpacks a contemporary social challenge, known to Shona people as Makunakuna, a taboo and prevalent crime spreading like a cancer in Zimbabwean communities.

The title “Eagles in the Hut” serves as a powerful metaphor encapsulating the central themes and motifs explored within the film’s narrative. An eagle is a predatory bird of prey that soars high in the sky and survives on hunting for its food in the wild, while a hut typically represents a small humble dwelling, or a place of safety (a sanctuary) for humans. Thus, through its juxtaposition of eagles with the humble confined space of the hut, the title suggests a collision of opposing forces: the soaring untamed spirit of the eagle against the grounded, constricted reality of life within the hut.

The film’s setting in rural Zimbabwe enriches the narrative by embedding the story within a context that reveres traditional values and practices. However, these same values are scrutinized as potential enablers of incestuous abuse, reflecting on how cultural norms might contribute to such devastating behaviors. The director challenges the audience to rethink these norms, especially those related to patriarchy, which often dictate and diminish the role and autonomy of women within the society.

Through the character of Mai James, the film unpacks the complexities of motherhood and the impact of its absence or distortion. Mai James is not merely a bystander but an active participant in the abuse, both physically and emotionally, highlighting how adherence to destructive cultural norms can perpetuate patriarchal dominance. While the director effectively portrays a stereotypically negative stepmother, this depiction unintentionally reinforces harmful gender stereotypes, suggesting that stepmothers are inherently vindictive. This portrayal serves to critique societal issues while also risking the entrenchment of damaging beliefs about women in these roles.

The film powerfully depicts the lasting psychological impact of threats issued by sexual predators, as seen through James’s control over Tariro. James intimidates Tariro by claiming to possess supernatural abilities that allows him to see and smell from afar, thus deterring Tariro from disclosing her ordeal. Throughout the film, James’s omnipresent appearances whenever Tariro considers revealing the abuse symbolize the psychological hold predators maintain over their victims. Hence, the theme of fear and control is central to the narrative, illustrating how abusers exploit power dynamics to enforce silence and compliance, thereby perpetuating the cycle of abuse.

In essence, Eagles in the Hut is not just a film about the atrocities of incestuous rape but also a broader commentary on the societal structures that enable such abuses. It is a poignant exploration of victimization, power dynamics, and the quest for justice, all set against a backdrop that vividly captures the cultural and traditional nuances of Zimbabwean society. The film leaves its audience with lingering questions about the nature of justice and the societal changes necessary to prevent such tragedies from continuing.

The film critically examines the erosion of traditional authority in rural Zimbabwean communities, where leaders are typically held in high esteem. Traditionally regarded as custodians of customs, these leaders’ authority is challenged in the film. Sabhuku’s (the village head) inability to compel James’s family to attend a Tsikamutanda (a witch hunter) ceremony where evil spirits are exorcised illustrates the declining influence of African culture on some individuals. Additionally, James chasing away Sabhuku symbolizes the undermining and dismissal of traditional values by certain societal members, highlighting a significant cultural shift.

The most important part of the narrative in Eagles in the Hut is the moral decision thrown back to the audience. After enduring years of abuse, Tariro eventually kills her father, a decision that aligns with sentiments expressed throughout the film that suggest death as a suitable justice and retribution for sexual abuse. This forces the audience to think deeply about the consequences of Tariro’s actions—although it is not easy to state if her action is right or wrong, it is clear that society failed her, as shown through the sad ending (the jailing of Tariro). The metaphor of the eagle culminates here, as Tariro’s act of violence can be seen as an attempt to reclaim the sky, to seize control from the predatory forces that dominated her life.

In conclusion, the film’s emotional depth and symbolic complexity offer a moving critique of the societal and cultural abuse dynamics that enable and conceal such abuses. It stands as a powerful testament to the enduring spirit of those who, despite being preyed upon, strive to break free from the confines of their oppression. Through its thoughtful exploration of these themes, the film not only entertains but also educates, urging a re-evaluation of the protective and predatory dynamics that exists within our own ‘huts’.