Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:15:28.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The differential impact of maternal dietary macronutrient composition on offspring birthweight – results from the Danish National Birth Cohort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

S.S. Sharma ,
D.C. Greenwood ,
C. Granström ,
N.A.B. Simpson ,
S.F. Olsen  and
J.E. Cade
S.S. Sharma
Affiliation:
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
D.C. Greenwood
Affiliation:
Division of Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
C. Granström
Affiliation:
Centre for Fetal Programming, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
N.A.B. Simpson
Affiliation:
Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
S.F. Olsen
Affiliation:
Centre for Fetal Programming, Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J.E. Cade
Affiliation:
Nutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 77 , Issue OCE4: Summer Meeting, 10–12 July 2018, Getting energy balance right , 2018 , E183
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

There is limited evidence about the differential impact of the dietary macronutrient composition (carbohydrate [CHO], protein and fat) during pregnancy on offspring birthweight(Reference Moore, Davies and Willson1, Reference Chong, Chia and Colega2). The aim of our study was to explore the association between maternal dietary macronutrient intake in the second trimester and offspring birthweight.

The study included 63,755 mother-infant pairs within the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC)(Reference Olsen, Melbye and Olsen3) in Denmark. Dietary data was collected in the food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) around the 25th week of gestation. Baseline information was collected from the participants at recruitment around the 12th week of gestation. Multiple linear regression models analysed the association between maternal macronutrient dietary intake in the second trimester and changes in birthweight. Both macronutrient models were mutually adjusted for energy contributing macronutrients. Model 1 was adjusted for confounders including pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake, smoking, parity, physical activity, dietary supplements, and competing exposures including gestational age at delivery, and sex of the offspring, and Model 2 was further adjusted for total micronutrient intakes (diet plus supplement) including calcium, iron, folate and vitamin B12.

1Mutually adjusted for other energy contributing macronutrients aAdjusted for pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), alcohol intake, smoking, parity, physical activity, dietary supplements, gestational age at delivery, and sex of the offspring bAdditional adjustment for total micronutrient intakes (calcium, iron, folate and vitamin B12).

Results showed that each additional 100 g/day CHO and 30 g/day protein consumption in the second trimester were associated with higher birthweights of 14 g (95 % CI 9 to 20; P < 0·001) and 17 g (95 % CI −9 to 25; P < 0·001) respectively. Conversely, each additional 30 g/day fat consumption was associated with a lower birthweight of 23 g (95 % CI 18 to 27; P < 0·001). CHO and protein intakes in the second trimester are associated with improving birthweight, whereas fat is associated with limiting offspring weight gain. We advise an appropriate balance of dietary energy intake during pregnancy to optimise birthweight.

References

1.Moore, VM, Davies, MJ, Willson, KJ et al. (2004) J Nutr 134, 1820–1826.Google Scholar
2.Chong, MF-F, Chia, AR, Colega, M et al. (2015) J Nutr 145, 1303–1310.Google Scholar
3.Olsen, J, Melbye, M, Olsen, SF et al. (2001) Scand J Public Health 29, 300–307.Google Scholar