Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T21:44:15.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kant on Rational Sympathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2024

Benjamin Vilhauer
Affiliation:
City University of New York, City College and Graduate Center

Summary

This Element explains Kant's distinction between rational sympathy and natural sympathy. Rational sympathy is regulated by practical reason and is necessary for adopting as our own those ends of others which are contingent from the perspective of practical rationality. Natural sympathy is passive and can prompt affect and dispose us to act wrongly. Sympathy is a function of a posteriori productive imagination. In rational sympathy, we freely use the imagination to step into others' first-person perspectives and associate imagined intuitional contents with the concepts others use to communicate their feelings. This prompts feelings in us that are like their feelings.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009371193
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 02 January 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Bibliography

Primary Sources

Kant, Immanuel (1924). Eine Vorlesung Kants über Ethik. Im Auftrag der Kantgesellschaft herausgegeben von Paul Menzer. Ed. Menzer, Paul. Berlin-Charlottenburg: Pan Verlag Rolf Heise.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1979). Kant’s gesammelte Schriften: Vorlesungen über Moralphilosophie, Band 27, Hälfte 2, T1 2. Ed. der Wissenschaften, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1993). Opus Posthumum. Trans. and ed. Förster, Eckart and Rosen, Michael. Förster, Eckart. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a). Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b). Religion and Rational Theology. Trans. and ed. Wood, Allen W. and di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997a). Lectures on Ethics. Trans. Heath, Peter, ed. Heath, Peter and Schneewind, J. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997b). Lectures on Metaphysics. Trans. and ed. Ameriks, Karl and Naragon, Steve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Paul Guyer, and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000). Critique of the Power of Judgment. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric, ed. Guyer, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2002). Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Ed. Allison, Henry and Heath, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007). Anthropology, History and Education. Ed. Zöller, Günther and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012). Lectures on Anthropology. Ed. Wood, Allen W. and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Baron, M. (1995). Kantian Ethics Almost without Apology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, M. (2013). “Friendship, Duties Regarding Specific Conditions of Persons, and the Virtues of Social Intercourse, (TL 6:468 – 474).” In Kant’s Tugendlehre: A Comprehensive Commentary, eds. Trampota, A., Sensen, O., and Timmermann, J.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 365382.Google Scholar
Baron, M. and Fahmy, M. S. (2009). “Beneficence and Other Duties of Love.” In The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics, ed. Hill, T. E.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 211228.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Early, S., and Salvarani, G. (1997). “Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels versus Imagining How You Would Feel.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23, 751758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxley, A. M. (2010). Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. (2007). “The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Empathy.” In Empathy and Mental Illness, eds. Farrow, T. F. D. and Woodruff, P. W. R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (2008). “The Ultimate Kantian Experience: Kant on Dinner Parties.History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (4), 315336.Google Scholar
Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., and Brunet, E. (2007). “The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Empathy.” In Empathy and Mental Illness, eds. Farrow, T. F. D. and Woodruff, P. W. R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 240260.Google Scholar
Denis, L. (2000). “Kant’s Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy.Kantian Review 4 (1), 4873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. S. (2009). “Active Sympathetic Participation: Reconsidering Kant’s Duty of Sympathy.Kantian Review 14 (1), 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. S. (2010). “Kantian Practical Love.Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3), 313331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. S. (2016). “Love’s Reasons.Journal of Value Inquiry 50, 153168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. S. (2019). “On Virtues of Love and Wide Ethical Duties.Kantian Review 24 (3), 415437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, P. (2010). “Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals.” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. Denis, L.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 130151.Google Scholar
Hay, C. (2013). Kantianism, Liberalism, and Feminism: Resisting Oppression. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herder, J. (1964/1774). “Vom Erkennen und Empfinden der menschlichen Seele.” In Herders Werke, vol. 3., ed. Dobbek, W.. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag, 769.Google Scholar
Herman, B. (1993). The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, C. (2023). “Feeling, Cognition, and the Eighteenth-Century Context of Kantian Sympathy.British Journal for the History of Philosophy 31 (5), 9741004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, S. D. and Biswas-Diener, R. (2007). “Balancing the Empathy Expense Account: Strategies for Regulating Empathic Response.” In Empathy and Mental Illness, eds. Farrow, T. F. D. and Woodruff, P. W. R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 390407.Google Scholar
Hurter, S., Paloyelis, Y., Williams, A., and Fotopoulou, A. (2014). “Partners’ Empathy Increases Pain Ratings: Effects of Perceived Empathy and Attachment Style on Pain Report and Display.The Journal of Pain 15 (9), 934944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korsgaard, C. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., and Reicher, S. (2005). “Identity and Emergency Intervention: How Social Group Membership and Inclusiveness of Group Boundaries Shape Helping Behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (4), 443453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makkreel, R. A. (2012). “Relating Aesthetic and Sociable Feelings to Moral and Participatory Feelings: Reassessing Kant on Sympathy and Honor.” In Kant’s Observations and Remarks: A Critical Guide, eds. Shell, S. M. and Velkley, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. C. (2012). The Ethics of Need: Agency, Dignity, and Obligation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. (1948). The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. (1956). “Kant on Friendship.” Proceedings of the British Academy 42, 4566.Google Scholar
Paytas, T. (2015). “Rational Beings with Emotional Needs: The Patient-Centered Grounds of Kant’s Duty of Humanity.History of Philosophy Quarterly 32 (4), 353376.Google Scholar
Sherman, N. (1997). Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant on Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirin, C., Valentino, N., and Villalobos, J. D. (2017). “The Social Causes and Political Consequences of Group Empathy.Political Psychology 38 (3), 427448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stueber, K. (2006). Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangney, J. P. (1991). “Moral Affect: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61, 598607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomason, K. (2017). “A Good Enough Heart: Kant and the Cultivation of Emotions.Kantian Review 22 (3), 441462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, J. (2014). “Kant and the Second-Person Standpoint.Grazer Philosophische Studien 90, 131147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, J. (2016). “Kant über Mitleidenschaft.Kant-Studien 107 (4), 729732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, J. (n.d.). Kant’s Theory of Sympathy. Book manuscript.Google Scholar
Varden, H. (2020a). Sex, Love, and Gender: A Kantian Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varden, H. (2020b). “Kantian Care.” In Caring for Liberalism: Dependency and Political Theory, eds. Baehr, A. and Bhandary, A.. New York: Routledge, 5074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilhauer, B. (2021a). “‘Reason’s Sympathy’ and Its Foundations in Productive Imagination.” Kantian Review 26 (3), 455474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilhauer, B. (2021b). “Sages, Sympathy, and Suffering in Kant’s Theory of Friendship.Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51 (6), 452467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilhauer, B. (2022). “‘Reason’s Sympathy’ and Others’ Ends in Kant.” European Journal of Philosophy 30 (1), 96112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wispé, L. (1987). “History of the Concept of Empathy.” In Empathy and Its Development, eds. Eisenberg, N. and Strayer, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1737.Google Scholar
Wood, A. W. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. W. (2008). Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Kant on Rational Sympathy
  • Benjamin Vilhauer, City University of New York, City College and Graduate Center
  • Online ISBN: 9781009371193
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Kant on Rational Sympathy
  • Benjamin Vilhauer, City University of New York, City College and Graduate Center
  • Online ISBN: 9781009371193
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Kant on Rational Sympathy
  • Benjamin Vilhauer, City University of New York, City College and Graduate Center
  • Online ISBN: 9781009371193
Available formats
×