Introduction
Seasonal variations of sea-ice cover in the Southern Ocean represent one of the most pronounced signals in the annual cycle of the world climate system. Intense cooling and brine rejection during sea-ice formation in the southwestern Weddell Sea lead to an increase in density of the water masses on the continental shelf. Mixing of this High Salinity Shelf Water (HSSW) with Modified Warm Deep Water (MWDW) yields Weddell Sea Bottom Water (WSBW; Reference Foster and CarmackFoster and Carmack, 1976), which contributes to the formation of Antarctic Bottom Water that spreads into the world ocean.
As density of high-latitude sea water is strongly controlled by salinity, the fresh-water budget of this region plays a key role in determining the characteristics of the newly formed water masses. For the Weddell Sea, formation and northward drift of sea ice yield an export of fresh water and thus are crucial to the salinity enrichment. Sources of fresh water are basal melting of ice shelves and the difference between precipitation and evaporation. Based on experiments with a newly developed coupled ice-ocean model, this paper presents an estimate of the surface fresh-water balance of the inner Weddell Sea (i.e. the region south of the line Kapp Norvegia-Joinville Island) and addresses the impact of sea-ice formation on water-mass characteristics in the Weddell Sea.
Model Configuration
The coupled sea-ice-ocean model applied to this study is BRIOS-2 (Bremerhaven Regional Ice-Ocean Simulations) and is based on a hydrostatic regional ocean circulation model and a dynamic-thermodynamic sea-ice model which is also applied to ice-shelf-ocean interaction.
The hydrostatic primitive-equation model SPEM (Reference Haidvogel, Wilkin and YoungHaidvogel and others, 1991) with a generalized s-coordinate transformation (Reference Song and HaidvogelSong and Haidvogel, 1994) was chosen because its terrain-following vertical coordinate is well suited for studies in model domains with both shallow and deep regions. Modifications allowing for the inclusion of sub-ice-shelf cavities as well as the sub-grid-scale parameterizations developed for both the stand-alone ocean model BRIOS-1 and the coupled model BRIOS-2 are described by Reference Beckmann, Hellmer and TimmermannBeckmann and others (1999).
The dynamic-thermodynamic sea-ice model includes a viscous-plastic rheology (Reference HiblerHibler, 1979), the Reference Parkinson and WashingtonParkinson and Washington (1979) thermodynamics using the Reference SemtnerSemtner (1976) zero-layer approach for heat conduction, and a prognostic snow layer (Reference Owens and LemkeOwens and Lemke, 1990) accounting for the effect of snow-ice conversion in case of flooding (Reference LeppärantaLeppäranta, 1983; Reference FischerFischer, 1995). As a stand-alone sea-ice model, it has been used for a sea-ice-mixed-layer-atmosphere interaction study in the Weddell Sea (Reference Timmermann, Lemke and KottmeierTimmermann and others, 1999) as well as to provide the forcing data for the stand-alone ocean model BRIOS-1 in a circumpolar model domain (Reference Beckmann, Hellmer and TimmermannBeckmann and others, 1999). In this study, the model’s thermodynamic component is also applied to the ice-ocean interaction at the ice-shelf base. In the entire model domain, freezing temperature is a function of pressure and salinity. While this does not significantly affect sea-ice-ocean interaction it is essential for the description of sub-ice-shelf processes (see, e.g., Reference Hellmer and OlbersHellmer and Olbers, 1989).
The integration is carried out on a circumpolar grid between 82° S and 48° S (Fig. 1). It covers the whole Southern Ocean but is focused on the Weddell Sea where the resolution is isotropic (1.5° in the zonal, 1.5° cos Φ in the meridional direction). In the vertical, 24 levels are used with increasing resolution near the surface and the bottom. Bottom topography was derived from data of Reference Johnson and SmithJohnson and Smith (1997), Reference Smith and SandwellSmith and Sandwell (1997) and Reference Schenke, Hinze, Dijkstra, Hoppmann, Niederjasper, Schone, Jacobs and WeissSchenke and others (1998). Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf (FRIS) and Ross Ice Shelf thicknesses are derived from the dataset of Reference Johnson and SmithJohnson and Smith (1997); the thickness of all other ice shelves is assumed to be 200 m owing to a lack of detailed data. At the open northern boundary, temperature and salinity are restored to climatological fields from the Hydrographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean (HASO; Reference Olbers, Gouretski, Seiss and SchroterOlbers and others, 1992). The transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) through Drake Passage is prescribed to be 130 Sv.
Model runs are initialized using data from HASO and forced with 6 hourly data of 10 m wind, total cloudiness and 2 m air and dew-point temperature from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECWMF) re-analyses of 1985−93. Precipitation and evaporation rates are derived from the U. S. National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) re-analysis dataset. Two passes of this 9 year period are used to obtain a quasi-stationary seasonal cycle of the sea-ice distribution. Results presented in this paper are from the third 9 years of integration.
The model has been validated with respect to minimum and maximum ice extent (presented below), ice thickness and drift using Special Sensor Microwave/Imager, upward-looking sonar (ULS) and buoy-drift data. A prominent feature of the simulated ocean circulation is a pronounced double cell structure quite similar to the results of Reference Beckmann, Hellmer and TimmermannBeckmann and others (1999) with transports quantitatively consistent with measurements of Reference Fahrbach, Rohardt, Schröder and StrassFahrbach and others (1994) and Reference Schroder and FahrbachSchroder and Fahrbach (1999). Water-mass properties will be shown to be in good agreement with observations. A more complete description of this model and its validation is part of a separate paper currently in preparation. Here, we focus on freezing and melting of sea ice and ice shelves and the related fresh-water fluxes.
Model Results and Discussion
Freezing and melting of sea ice
Indicative of the coupled model’s seasonal cycle are minimum and maximum sea-ice extent in the Weddell sector of the Southern Ocean (Fig. 2). It appears that the model tends to underestimate the summer sea-ice coverage, especially in the northwestern Weddell Sea. Sensitivity studies using the ECMWF analysis instead of the re-analysis data indicate that due to the coarser resolution in the re-analysis the topographic effect of the Antarctic Peninsula is not adequately covered. Compared to the analysis, 2 m temperatures in the ECMWF re-analysis in that region are warmer by 1−2°C, thus warmer than the ocean surface freezing temperature. This leads to a downward flux of sensible heat causing unrealistic melting of sea ice in that part of the model domain.
In contrast, the maximum sea-ice extent is in good agreement with observations. Winter sea-ice coverage is predominantly determined by the effects of the west wind drift and the ACC which (1) acts as a force driving sea ice eastward and (2) forms a "thermal barrier" limiting further northward spreading of ice.
Due to regional differences in the heat balance of the upper ocean, freezing and melting regions of sea ice do not coincide. Between formation and decay, sea ice may drift over distances of > 1000 km. In the 9 year average, the highest net freezing rates (typically 1.5−2 m a"1, maximum up to 4 m a"1 in the southwestern Weddell Sea) occur along the Antarctic coast (Fig. 3). Katabatic winds in these regions induce a divergent ice drift and carry very cold continental air. In reality, they lead to the formation of coastal polynyas in which great amounts of sea ice are formed (Reference Markus, Kottmeier, Fahrbach and JeffriesMarkus and others, 1998). The model is not able to resolve these polynyas as open-water gridboxes but it does reproduce the divergent ice drift causing low sea-ice concentrations, increased heat loss in the open-water areas, and thus the high freezing rates along the coast.
Clearly separated from the sea-ice formation regions are the regions of net melting. The highest melting of up to 1.8 ma−1 occurs around 60° S where the sea ice encounters the warm surface waters of the ACC.
The model has been validated using ice-thickness data derived from measurements of six ULSs (Reference Strass, Fahrbach and JeffriesStrass and Fahrbach, 1998) which were moored along the line Kapp Norvegia-Joinville Island in the Weddell Sea (see Fig. 3). Comparison of simulated sea-ice thickness with the observed 7 day mean yields an underestimation of short-term variability but shows good agreement with winter ice thickness in the central and eastern Weddell Sea. However, as summer sea-ice melting in the northwestern Weddell Sea is overestimated, the model tends to underestimate sea-ice volume in the vicinity of the Antarctic Peninsula. Export of sea ice across the line Kapp Norvegia-Joinville Island, i.e. net ice export out of the inner Weddell Sea, in the period 1985−93 was estimated to be (46 ± 8) × 103 m3 s-1 by Reference Harms, Fahrbach and StrassHarms and others (2001). The simulated 9 year average ice export out of the inner Weddell Sea is (42 ±26) × 103 m3 s-1 which is quite close to the estimates derived from observations. Assuming sea-ice salinity of 5 psu (practical salinity units) and densities of 910 kg m−3 for sea ice and 290 kg m-3 for snow, this converts into a fresh-water export of 33.7 mSv (1 mSv = 10 3 m3 s −1 ) , which is extracted from the inner Weddell Sea surface by the formation of sea ice and the accumulation of snow.
Freezing and melting of ice shelves
As can be seen in Figure 3, freezing and melting rates at the ice-shelf base can be of the same order of magnitude as the net freezing rates of sea ice. Under the FRIS, the highest melting rates of up to 3 m a"1 occur near the grounding line, where the in situ freezing temperature is as low as −2.6°C (Fig. 4). Basal melting rates over the Filchner Depression reach 1.5 m a"1. North of the combined Henry/Korff Ice Rise complex, a large area with basal freezing rates of 0.3 m a"1 is encountered. Compared with the FRIS model of Reference Gerdes, Determann and GrosfeldGerdes and others (1999) who use a higher resolution but fixed northern boundary conditions, the distribution of basal freezing and melting regions is quite similar. In their model, the basal freezing region north of Henry/Korff Ice Rise is significantly smaller, but this is compensated for by a higher freezing rate. Further difference exists for the melting rates at the Filchner Ice Shelf base, which are significantly less pronounced in Reference Gerdes, Determann and GrosfeldGerdes and others’ (1999) model. Using the ice-shelf model of Reference Hellmer, Jacobs, Jenkins, Jacobs and WeissHellmer and others (1998) for the FRIS, as described by Reference Beckmann, Hellmer and TimmermannBeckmann and others (1999), yields lower amplitudes of both freezing and melting, but an average melting rate of 29−30 cm a"1 is computed in both models, resulting in a mean net fresh-water input of 3.2 mSv.
Ice-ocean interaction at the base of Larsen Ice Shelf (LIS) and the eastern Weddell ice shelves (EWIS) is characterized by high melting rates. In the EWIS cavity, relatively warm water from the coastal current is in direct contact with the ice-shelf base. Beneath LIS, no water warmer than −1.2°C is found in the simulation. Since this is still warmer than the −1.6°C observed by Reference Gordon, Jacobs and WeissGordon (1998), freezing rates might be overestimated. However, it is reasonable to believe that near the grounding line both ice shelves are thicker than the 200 m prescribed in the model. Keeping that in mind, the temperature difference between the uppermost layer and the ice-shelf base might well be captured realistically.
In BRIOS-2, LIS and EWIS yield fresh-water fluxes of 1.6 and 4.2 mSv, respectively.Thus, despite their small extent, the EWIS provide more fresh water than the much larger FRIS.
Fresh-water budget of the inner Weddell Sea
In the previous sections we discussed ice-ocean interactions in the inner Weddell Sea and introduced the resulting fresh-water fluxes. Combining these components leads us to an estimate of the surface fresh-water balance of the inner Weddell Sea.
In the 9 year average, sea-ice formation and export extracts 33.7 mSv of fresh water from the inner Weddell Sea. Ice-shelf basal melting provides 9.1 mSv of fresh water; net precipitation (precipitation minus evaporation from NCEP re-analysis) adds another 19.0 mSv (Fig. 5).
More fresh water originates from the Antarctic continent. According to Huybrechts (personal communication, 2000), fresh-water runoff from the Antarctic continent does not exceed 10 × 1012kg a−1, which results in a circumpolar freshwater input of <0.3 mSv, and an estimated 0.05 mSv for the inner Weddell Sea which is clearly negligible. The maximum estimate for iceberg calving amounts to 2000 × 1012kg a−1, which would yield roughly 60 mSv for the entire Southern Ocean. However, since most of the iceberg melting occurs north of 65° S when in contact with the warm waters of the ACC (Reference RomanovRomanov, 1973), this contribution can be neglected as well. Snow accumulated on top of the ice shield and shelves may be carried into the open ocean by katabatic winds. As reliable estimates of the drifted-snow volume do not exist, we ignore this contribution.
The balance from all fresh-water fluxes considered here reveals that fresh-water extraction by sea-ice formation is roughly counterbalanced by the input through net precipitation and shelf-ice basal melting in the annual mean. For the 9 year average, 5.7 mSv of fresh water are extracted through the surface of the inner Weddell Sea. However, time series of these fresh-water fluxes (Fig. 6) indicate that the net amount is the residuum of several large components of different signs. In the annual cycle, the monthly mean freshwater input varies between −200 and 400 mSv. Seasonal variability is dominated by freezing and melting of sea ice. The influence of fluctuations of net precipitation and ice-shelf melting is minor. The standard deviation of the annual mean net surface fresh-water flux is 13 mSv and thus much larger than the 9 year average.
The fresh-water budget of the inner Weddell Sea as we derived it from model analysis is quite close to the mostly remote-sensing-data-based estimate of Reference Drinkwater, Liu and HarmsDrinkwater and others (2001). However, considering the large standard deviation in the annual mean net surface fresh-water flux, these results do not conflict with estimates of Reference Fahrbach, Rohardt, Schröder and StrassFahrbach and others (1994), pointing out that the net (southward) advection of salt into the inner Weddell Sea is not significantly different from zero.
Sensitivity of water-mass structure in the Weddell Sea to sea-ice-related salt fluxes
In contrast to a number of previous coupled sea-ice-ocean models (e.g. Reference Kim and StosselKim and Stossel, 1998), bottom-water formation in BRIOS-2 does not occur through deep convection in the central Weddell Sea. Instead, the application of an ocean circulation model with terrain-following vertical coordinate enables us to cover processes on the continental shelf quite realistically, and an adequate parameterization of vertical mixing (Reference Beckmann, Hellmer and TimmermannBeckmann and others, 1999) prevents the water column in the central Weddell Sea from being homogenized. Thus, simulated water-mass characteristics in the Weddell Sea (Fig. 7, left) are in good agreement with observations presented by Reference Schroder and FahrbachSchröder and Fahrbach (1999). Specifically, HSSW with s > 34.75 and temperature near the freezing point (Tf) is formed on the continental shelf of the southwestern Weddell Sea. Its presence, however, is subject to seasonal and interannual variability.
In order to investigate the effect of sea-ice formation on the water-mass structure, we performed an experiment in which all salt fluxes related to sea-ice growth and decay were eliminated. Once the ocean surface reaches freezing temperature, further heat loss is excluded. From the heat-flux point of view, this resembles a zero-order sea-ice model like the approach often used in ocean modelling (e.g. DYNAMO Group, 1997).
Ignoring the surface salt flux leads to a rapid change in the water-mass structure (Fig. 7, right). No more HSSW is formed; instead Warm Deep Water (WDW) mixes with lighter Surface Water (SW) which became fresher by 1 psu within 5 years of integration. Due to an insufficient density increase, mixed-layer deepening in autumn is greatly reduced; a pronounced winter water layer does not form, and mixing of WDW and SW occurs mainly as cross-pycnocline diffusion driven by the strong vertical gradients. No water denser than the WDW is formed at any time of the year, so the bottom water is not ventilated any more and even the large amount of WSDW is slowly eroded. This leads us to conclude that sea-ice formation over the continental shelf in the southwestern Weddell Sea is a necessary condition for formation of Weddell Sea Deep and Bottom Water.
Conclusions
The fresh-water budget of the inner Weddell Sea, i.e. the region south of the line Kapp Norvegia-Joinville Island, is dominated by the balance between fresh-water removal due to sea-ice formation and export, and fresh-water input by ice-shelf basal melting and net precipitation. The net amount of fresh-water loss through the surface of the inner Weddell Sea is estimated to be 6 ±13 mSv in the annual mean and thus not significantly different from zero.
Sea-ice formation appears to be a necessary condition for the formation of the Weddell Sea’s deep and bottom waters and thus for the renewal of Antarctic Bottom Water ventilating the world ocean.
Since stratification in the Weddell Sea is weak, any changes in the sea-ice formation and the surface fresh-water balance might influence the onset of deep convection, have a significant impact on water-mass formation and thus affect the global thermohaline circulation.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank W. Cohrs and C. Lichey for preparing the ECMWF and NCEP atmospheric forcing fields which were received via the German Weather Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst, DWD) and the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (NOAA-CIRES) Climate Diagnostics Center, Boulder, CO, using the website http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/, respectively.