Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:29:43.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global imperative to combat stigma associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2020

Wen Li
Affiliation:
Unit of Psychiatry, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China Center for Cognition and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China
Yuan Yang
Affiliation:
Unit of Psychiatry, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China Center for Cognition and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China Department of Psychiatry, Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital & Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brian Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Guangdong, China
Chee H. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Melbourne Clinic and St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
Ling Zhang
Affiliation:
The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Qinge Zhang
Affiliation:
The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Teris Cheung
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
Yu-Tao Xiang*
Affiliation:
Unit of Psychiatry, Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China Center for Cognition and Brain Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China
*
Author for correspondence: Yu-Tao Xiang, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is included and the original work is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019 before it was declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in March 2020. Regrettably, the COVID-19 pandemic has often been erroneously associated with specific countries, regions, or ethnicities, which could potentially lead to prejudice and discrimination against certain places and people. For instance, China has been blamed by some influential politicians (Nature, 2020), and some mass media has held China solely responsible for the rapid global transmission of COVID-19 (Zheng, Goh, & Wen, Reference Zheng, Goh and Wen2020). As a result, during the COVID-19 outbreak there has been an increase in racial discrimination against people of Chinese and Asian background globally, including students being subjected to racist aggression (King, Leow, Carbakarpa, & Ng, Reference King, Leow, Carbakarpa and Ng2020). Seemingly, people residing in COVID-19 infected areas, such as in Wuhan, were subjected to disproportionate prejudice and discrimination compared to other non-infected regions (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Goh and Wen2020). Recently, the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak, including depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances, have been vigorously investigated in vulnerable populations, such as frontline health professionals, infected patients, psychiatric patients, and the general population. However, the social stigma associated with COVID-19 has not been given sufficient attention in research studies.

Previous studies have found that patients with severe infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), were common targets of discrimination. During the COVID-19 pandemic, infected patients are arguably the most vulnerable group to endure the damaging effects of stigma on mental health and increased risk of psychological comorbidities including depression, stress-related disorders, and sleep disturbances. The fear of stigmatization may prevent at-risk individuals from appropriately seeking medical help in a timely manner (Chang et al., Reference Chang, Huang, Lee, Hsu, Hsieh and Chou2004), which could increase the community transmission risk, and delay treatment for patients in critical physical conditions. Regarding the frontline health professionals and volunteers, stigma could increase the risk of psychological distress and burnout. Those who have been quarantined may also have difficulty in returning to their workplace due to stigma and discrimination, which could lead to loss of productivity and income.

Similar to other epidemics of novel diseases, COVID-19 is also characterized by high risk of contagion and mortality, uncertain prognosis and lack of effective treatment in certain subpopulations (WHO Director, 2020), all of which can cause widespread public fear. The extensive media coverage of the infection as well as the ‘infodemic’ of inaccurate information may further deepen the misunderstanding of the disease and escalate the level of stigmatization towards people suffering from the disease. In addition, mass quarantine which has been used to effectively control disease transmission in many countries, can inadvertently heighten the stigma (Lee, Chan, Chau, Kwok, & Kleinman, Reference Lee, Chan, Chau, Kwok and Kleinman2005). Certain features of COVID-19 may also increase the likelihood of associated stigmatization. For instance, COVID-19 can have a long incubation period of up to 33 days and the COVID-19 test has a relatively high rate of false-negative results (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Yan, Qiu, Jiao, Chen, Tan and Luo2020), leading to unsuccessful identification of at-risk patients even after the two-week quarantine (Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Niu, Li, Li, Cai, Chen and Wang2020). Further, there were concerns that a small proportion of recovered patients have later tested positive again after discharge (Lan et al., Reference Lan, Xu, Ye, Xia, Wang, Li and Xu2020). What is more, a considerable proportion of COVID-19 infected cases are in fact asymptomatic carriers (Nishiura et al., Reference Nishiura, Kobayashi, Miyama, Suzuki, Jung, Hayashi and Linton2020), who can readily infect others (Aguilar, Faust, Westafer, & Gutierrez, Reference Aguilar, Faust, Westafer and Gutierrez2020). All the aforementioned factors could worsen the fear and stigma associated with COVID-19 among infected patients, suspected cases, close contacts, residents in epicentres of infection and frontline medical staff.

It is imperative that stigma associated with the COVID-19 pandemic must be addressed. As cited in Nature, ‘viruses do not discriminate, everyone is at risk, coronavirus stigma must stop’ (Nature, 2020). Timely and effective measures need to be developed and implemented to address COVID-19-related stigma. Here, we suggest several major key points to be considered. Firstly, global international and multi-sector collaboration should be immediately established to combat COVID-19-related stigma and discrimination. For example, large-scale epidemiological studies should be conducted to investigate the patterns of stigma in different populations and regions affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. The results from these studies can inform anti-stigma and anti-discrimination guidelines while incorporating local institutional policies and public education programs. Secondly, accurate information on the clinical features of COVID-19 which are critically linked to its public perception, such as the degree of transmissibility in asymptomatic carriers and the recurrence rate of COVID-19 in recovered patients, should be disseminated to reduce uncertainty and alleviate public fear. Thirdly, healthcare professionals, recovered patients and quarantined individuals should be applauded publically, such as through media coverage to promote positive perception towards vulnerable subpopulations. Lastly, appropriate anti-stigma interventions should be integrated into psychological crisis intervention strategies to reduce the negative impact of stigma on affected populations.

Stigmatization is common during a pandemic and likely to exacerbate the adverse psychological and social impact of the infection. Learning from the past experience of several viral epidemics in recent decades, the development and implementation of timely measures based on international and multisector collaboration could help reduce COVID-19-related stigma.

Financial support

None.

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Aguilar, J. B., Faust, J. S., Westafer, L. M., & Gutierrez, J. B. (2020). Investigating the impact of asymptomatic carriers on COVID-19 transmission. medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.18.20037994.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J., Huang, N., Lee, C.-H., Hsu, Y.-J., Hsieh, C.-J., & Chou, Y.-J. (2004). The impact of the SARS epidemic on the utilization of medical services: SARS and the fear of SARS. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 562564. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.4.562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, X., Niu, Y., Li, X., Li, L., Cai, W., Chen, Y., … Wang, E. (2020). Is a 14-day quarantine period optimal for effectively controlling coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.15.20036533.Google Scholar
King, J., Leow, F., Carbakarpa, S., & Ng, C. H. (2020). Addressing international student mental health during COVID-19: An imperative overdue. Australasian Psychiatry. doi: 10.1177/1039856220926934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lan, L., Xu, D., Ye, G., Xia, C., Wang, S., Li, Y., & Xu, H. (2020). Positive RT-PCR test results in patients recovered from COVID-19. JAMA, 323(15), 15021503. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S., Chan, L. Y., Chau, A. M., Kwok, K. P., & Kleinman, A. (2005). The experience of SARS-related stigma at Amoy Gardens. Social Science and Medicine, 61(9), 20382046. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nature. (2020). Stop the coronavirus stigma now. Nature, 580(7802), 165. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01009-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiura, H., Kobayashi, T., Miyama, T., Suzuki, A., Jung, S., Hayashi, K., … Linton, N. M. (2020). Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus infections (COVID-19). International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 94, 154155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO Director. (2020). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19–11 March 2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 (accessed April 14, 2020).Google Scholar
Xu, H., Yan, L., Qiu, C. M., Jiao, B., Chen, Y., Tan, X., … Luo, A. (2020). Analysis and prediction of false negative results for SARS-CoV-2 detection with pharyngeal swab specimen in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study. medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.26.20043042.Google Scholar
Zheng, Y., Goh, E., & Wen, J. (2020). The effects of misleading media reports about COVID-19 on Chinese tourists’ mental health: A perspective article. Anatolia, 31(2), 337340. doi: 10.1080/13032917.2020.1747208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar