Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:47:01.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing genotypes and antibiotic resistance profiles of Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium massiliense clinical isolates in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2021

Yiting Wang ,
Wencong He ,
Ping He ,
Huiwen Zheng Open the ORCID record for Huiwen Zheng [Opens in a new window]  and
Yanlin Zhao
Yiting Wang
Affiliation:
National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102200, China Planned Immunity Inoculation Institute, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
Wencong He
Affiliation:
National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102200, China
Ping He
Affiliation:
National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102200, China
Huiwen Zheng*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Respiratory Infection Diseases, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing 100045, China
Yanlin Zhao*
Affiliation:
National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102200, China
*
Authors for correspondence: Yanlin Zhao, E-mail: [email protected]; Huiwen Zheng, E-mail: [email protected]
Authors for correspondence: Yanlin Zhao, E-mail: [email protected]; Huiwen Zheng, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate differences in the antimicrobial susceptibility of members of the Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC): subsp. massiliense and subsp. abscessus, and to identify associations between strain genotypes and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes. A total of 383 clinical MABC isolates (subsp. abscessus: n = 218, 56.9%; subsp. massiliense: n = 163, 42.6%; subsp. bolletii: n = 2, 0.5%) were characterised using multilocus variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) typing and drug susceptibility testing. Most isolates exhibited susceptibility to amikacin, clarithromycin and azithromycin but resistance to cefoxitin and minocycline was statistically more associated with isolates unclustered by VNTR type. The Simpson's diversity indexes of VNTR typing for M. abscessus and M. massiliense isolates were 0.999 and 0.997, respectively. Genotyping of M. abscessus and M. massiliense isolates by VNTR may provide valuable information for predicting resistance phenotype.

Keywords

Drug susceptibility testinggenotypenontuberculous mycobacteria
Type
Original Paper
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 149 , 2021 , e232
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) have been increasingly recognised as causative agents of opportunistic infections of humans, generally affecting the lungs, skin and soft tissue and visceral or disseminated in severely immunosuppressed individuals [Reference Griffith1]. The organisms are generally classified according to their rapid, or slow, rates of growth on culture media [Reference Koh2]. Mycobacterium abscessus is the most frequently encountered rapid grower among NTM causing pulmonary infections, and accounts for 65–80% of cases [Reference Benwill3]. The group is characterised by extensive antimicrobial drug resistance which often results in unsatisfactory clinical treatment outcomes [Reference Jarand4].

M. abscessus complex (MABC) isolates have been further differentiated on the basis of rpoB sequences into three closely related subspecies, namely: M. abscessus, Mycobacterium massiliense and M. bolletii [Reference Adekambi5]. In spite of several shared taxonomic characteristics, the subspecies exhibit distinctly different antibiotic resistance phenotypes and treatment outcomes [Reference Bastian6]. Differences are particularly pronounced between M. abscessus and M. massiliense, especially in the treatment response rates of patients to clarithromycin (CLA)-based antibiotic therapy, where greater efficacy was evident for pulmonary patients infected with M. massiliense than with M. abscessus [Reference Koh2, Reference Kim7]. Similarly, M. massiliense was reported to have greater susceptibility to doxycycline, although this was based on small numbers of M. abscessus isolates tested [Reference Koh2]. Nevertheless, since these results suggested that subspecies and possibly strain genotypes, may be predictive of antibiotic resistance phenotype, further testing of this concept was conducted in this larger study.

Variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis has been used as a suitable tool for genetic fingerprinting of several bacterial species, including the pathogenic mycobacteria [Reference Choi8]. Indeed, a recent study revealed that specific VNTR genotypes were associated with drug resistance in isolates of both M. tuberculosis and M. intracellulare [Reference Zheng9]. However, an association of drug resistance profiles within the M. abscessus complex has not to our knowledge been previously described.

In this study, isolates of the species complex were characterised to the subspecies level and correlations of drug resistant profiles with subspecies analysed, with the ultimate goal of identifying predictive associations between strain genotypes and drug resistance phenotypes.

Methods

Clinical isolates and species identification

In total, 383 MABC isolates were recovered from clinical specimens collected between 2014 and 2016 from patients in two specialised TB treatment hospitals in China. All patients providing isolates met the microbiological and clinical criteria of the American Thoracic Society for a diagnosis of NTM pulmonary disease [Reference Griffith1]. The study was approved by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Clinical samples were cultured on Löwenstein–Jensen (L–J) medium after alkali treatment with 4% NaOH. After 4 days of incubation, colonies were scraped from the surface of the medium for the preparation of genomic DNA as previously reported [Reference Mikaeili10]. Identification of subspecies was determined by multilocus sequence typing of genes encoding 16S rRNA, hsp65, rpoB and 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer sequence loci [Reference Slany11].

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The drug susceptibility profiles of isolates were determined by a broth microdilution method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [12]. Briefly, freshly grown colonies from L–J slants were vortexed with glass beads in saline. The resulting suspension was adjusted to 0.5 McFarland and further diluted 1:200 in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth before being added to 96-well microtitre plates containing serial doubling-dilutions of antimicrobial agents. After incubation at 37 °C for 72 h, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic to inhibit visible growth of mycobacteria.

The following 18 antimicrobial agents in a concentration range of 0.0625–256 μg/ml were tested: clarithromycin (CLA), amikacin (AMK), moxifloxacin (MXF), linezolid (LZD), rifabutin (RFB), tobramycin (TOB), meropenem (MEM), imipenem (IMP), cefoxitin (FOX), capreomycin (CAP), azithromycin (AZM), levofloxacin (LVX), gatifloxacin (GAT), minocycline (MNO), tigecycline (TIG), sulphamethoxazole (SFX), streptomycin (STR) and clofazimine (CFM). Classification of susceptibility was recorded according to CLSI breakpoints, and where unavailable, was compared with previously published studies [Reference Zheng9, Reference Pang13, Reference Wei14].

VNTR analysis

VNTR typing of isolates was performed by the method of Wong et al. [Reference Wong15], but with the exclusion of locus TR20 due to amplification failure; analysis was therefore based on 17 loci. The discriminatory power of VNTR typing was calculated using Simpson's index of diversity as previously described [Reference Hunter16]. Clustered strains were defined as isolates with the same genotype, compared with ‘unclustered’ isolates of different genotypes.

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Isolates were identified to the subspecies level as M. abscessus (218, 56.9%), M. massiliense (163, 42.6%) and M. bolletii (2, 0.5%). The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing grouped according to MIC ranges are summarised in Table 1. The three most effective agents against both M. abscessus and M. massiliense isolates were AMK, CLA and AZM, with respective resistance rates for M. abscessus of 2.8%, 6.4% and 15.1%, and for M. massiliense of 4.3%, 10.4% and 12.9%; no significant differences in resistance to these drugs were observed between subspecies (P = 0.383, 0.151 and 0.535, respectively). LZD and FOX each exhibited activity against a moderate number of M. abscessus and M. massiliense isolates, with respective species resistance rates to LZD of 15.6% vs. 22.1%, and to FOX of 25.7% vs. 31.3%, with no statistical difference between species observed (P > 0.05). With regards to MXF, GAT, SFX and TIG results, antibiotic resistance rates were lower for M. abscessus vs. M. massiliense as follows: 55.0% vs. 66.3%, P = 0.016 for MXF; 45.4% vs. 62.6%, P < 0.001 for GAT; 53.7% vs. 76.7%, P < 0.001 for SFX and 22.9% vs. 34.3%, P < 0.001 for TIG. In contrast, a greater percentage of M. abscessus isolates were resistant to MNO (198, 90.8%), compared with 50.9% of M. massiliense (P < 0.001).

Table 1. MICs (μg/ml) of antimicrobials against M. abscessus and M. massiliense isolates

a MIC50 represents the concentration required to inhibit the growth of 50% of the strains; MIC90 represents the concentration required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the strains.

b Susceptibility and resistance breakpoints as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI-M24-A2) [12].

Genotyping and clustering analysis

All isolates, with the exception of the two M. bolletii, were genotyped by VNTR and assigned to phylogenetic clusters. The 218 M. abscessus representatives were differentiated into 10 clusters (comprising two to nine isolates per cluster) and 188 unique genotypes (Fig. 1). Similarly, 119 of the 163 M. massiliense isolates were differentiated into unique genotypes, with the remaining 44 isolates grouped into 16 clusters (two to five isolates per cluster) (Fig. 2). The clustering rate of M. massiliense was 17.2%, compared with 9.2% for M. abscessus (P > 0.05). Analysis of the allelic diversity of VNTR loci between M. abscessus and M. massiliense (Fig. 3) isolates showed that most M. abscessus exhibited allelic diversity, with the exception of locus TR101. Notably, loci TR2 and TR137 were found to be less polymorphic and thus less discriminatory between M. massiliense isolates (h < 0.2), whereas the opposite was true for M. abscessus (h > 0.6).

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of M. abscessus

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of M. massiliense

Fig. 3. VNTR allelic distribution in M. abscessus and M. massiliense clinical isolates

VNTR genotype and drug susceptibility

Associations between VNTR genotype and drug susceptibility profiles of M. abscessus and M. massiliense (Table 2) showed that of the 188 unclustered isolates of the former, 53 (28.2%) were resistant to FOX which was a significantly higher rate than that for clustered isolates (3/30, 10.0%, P = 0.041). Similarly, for M. massiliense, the rate of MNO resistance among unclustered isolates (65/119, 54.6%) was significantly higher than among clustered isolates (18/44, 40.9%, P = 0.029). No significant differences were evident for other drug resistance rates between clustered and unclustered isolates within M. abscessus or M. massiliense groups of isolates (P > 0.05) (Supplementary table).

Table 2. Susceptibility to cefoxitin (FOX) and minocycline (MNO) of clustered and unclustered strains of M. abscessus and M. massiliense

Discussion

Rapidly growing mycobacteria have in recent years been increasingly implicated as causes of extensive pulmonary infections in many countries [Reference Brown-Elliott17, Reference Lee18]. Due to their natural resistance to most commonly administered antibiotics, infections by MABC members, especially the prevalent subspecies M. abscessus, requires special treatment regimens [Reference Bastian6, Reference Kim7]. In this study, we compared in vitro drug susceptibility profiles between isolates of these subspecies from patients in China, and explored potential associations of antimicrobial susceptibility and strain genotypes that might have predictive value for guiding antimicrobial therapy.

The key finding was that both antibiotic susceptibility profiles and genotyping results differed between M. abscessus and M. massiliense. Of the three cornerstone drugs CLA, AMK and FOX, used for treatment of M. abscessus infections, CLA and AMK exhibited the highest activities against both species, but with a higher percentage of CLA-resistant strains of M. massiliense than M. abscessus, as was also observed by Nie et al. [Reference Nie19]. However, according to Harada et al. [Reference Harada20], CLA resistance rates of M. abscessus eclipsed those for M. massiliense in experiments based on a 14-day incubation period rather than the conventional 3-day period. Nevertheless, our results are in agreement with Nie et al. [Reference Nie19] in that resistance in M. massiliense is more extensive than in M. abscessus in China. We found high resistance rates to MXF, GAT and LVX in both subspecies, particularly for LVX which was much higher than those for MXF and GAT. These findings are consistent with previous reports that MABC isolates are frequently fluoroquinolone-resistant [Reference Nie19]. This phenomenon may be due to the overuse of fluoroquinolones in China, although some isolates are naturally resistant to this antimicrobial class [Reference Nie19]. Moreover, resistant rates to SFX and TIG among M. abscessus were shown here to be significantly lower than that for M. massiliense, indicating increased resistance in the latter. By contrast, M. massiliense proved to be more susceptible to MNO compared to M. abscessus, a finding in line with Adekambi et al. [Reference Adekambi21].

VNTR typing based on 17-loci was highly discriminatory for the two subspecies with DI（Diversity Index）values of 0.999 and 0.997, respectively, slightly exceeding values obtained for Malaysian and Japanese isolates [Reference Wong15, Reference Yoshida22]. Of differences in TR-2 and -137 loci (DI, respectively, 0.400 and 0.392 in Malaysia, and 0.786 and 0.736 in China), allelic diversity among most other M. abscessus loci was similar to previously published data [Reference Wong15]. This was speculated to be possibly due to phylogenetic incongruence among strains from different geographic regions, resulting in alterations in the discriminatory power of some loci. Most VNTR loci, except for TR101, of M. massiliense showed less allelic diversity than for M. abscessus, which suggests that these loci might be more suitable for differentiation between isolates of the latter. Similarly, the higher cluster rate of M. massiliense isolates may be a reflection related to pathogenicity associated with the severity of the epidemic, a concept which warrants further exploration.

To our knowledge, there are no comparable reports from China which have investigated strain VNTR genotype associations with drug resistance phenotypes for M. abscessus and M. massiliense on such a large number of samples. We observed that FOX resistance was more common among unclustered than clustered strains of M. abscessus, the former being significantly associated with MNO resistance in M. massiliense. Although NTM are regarded as opportunists that cause infections in both immunocompromised and vulnerable immunocompetent hosts [Reference van Ingen23], the observed resistance to FOX and MNO may be related to the pathogenicity of MABC strains and host preferences, leading to a biased distribution of these resistances among the subspecies.

Our study had two key limitations. First, we did not analyse M. bolletii isolates, due to the small number of samples, and second, as had been done in several other studies, we used 37 °C instead of 30 °C for DST (Drug susceptibility testing) analysis of rapid growers.

In conclusion, these data illustrate that among MABC isolates in China, M. abscessus was the most common subspecies followed by M. massiliense. AMK, CLA and AZM exhibited high antimicrobial activities but with significantly different resistance rates to MXF, GAT, SFX, TIG and MNO, between subspecies. Additionally, 17-loci VNTR typing had high discriminatory power for differentiation of clustered and unclustered isolates. Given the wide heterogeneity of resistance profiles to currently available antimicrobials, further genotype differentiation among subspecies may prove to be predictive of antibiotic resistance phenotypes, and inform more effective antibiotic regimens to optimise treatment outcomes for patients suffering from NTM pulmonary diseases.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821002211.

Financial support

This study was supported by National Science and Technology Major Project, Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018ZX10103001) and The National Major Science and Technology Project for Control and Prevention of Major Infectious Diseases in China (2017ZX10103004).

Conflict of interest

None.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

Griffith, DE et al. (2007) An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 175, 367–416.10.1164/rccm.200604-571STCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koh, WJ et al. (2011) Clinical significance of differentiation of Mycobacterium massiliense from Mycobacterium abscessus. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 183, 405–410.10.1164/rccm.201003-0395OCCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benwill, JL et al. (2014) Mycobacterium abscessus: challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 27, 506–510.10.1097/QCO.0000000000000104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarand, J et al. (2011) Clinical and microbiologic outcomes in patients receiving treatment for Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases 52, 565–571.10.1093/cid/ciq237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adekambi, T et al. (2009) Mycobacterium bolletii respiratory infections. Emerging Infectious Diseases 15, 302–305.10.3201/eid1502.080837CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bastian, S et al. (2011) Assessment of clarithromycin susceptibility in strains belonging to the Mycobacterium abscessus group by erm(41) and rrl sequencing. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 55, 775–781.10.1128/AAC.00861-10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, HS et al. (2012) Serial CT findings of Mycobacterium massiliense pulmonary disease compared with Mycobacterium abscessus disease after treatment with antibiotic therapy. Radiology 263, 260–270.10.1148/radiol.12111374CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, GE et al. (2011) Efficient differentiation of Mycobacterium abscessus complex isolates to the species level by a novel PCR-based variable-number tandem-repeat assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 1107–1109.10.1128/JCM.02318-10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H et al. (2017) Comparing the genotype and drug susceptibilities between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 30, 517–525.Google ScholarPubMed
Mikaeili, F et al. (2013) Comparison of six simple methods for extracting ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA from Toxocara and Toxascaris nematodes. Experimental Parasitology 134, 155–159.10.1016/j.exppara.2013.02.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slany, M et al. (2012) Molecular detection of nontuberculous mycobacteria: advantages and limits of a broad-range sequencing approach. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 22, 268–276.10.1159/000342517CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CLSI (2018). Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardia spp., and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes, 3rd Edn. CLSI Standard M24. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Pang, H et al. (2015) In vitro drug susceptibility of 40 international reference rapidly growing mycobacteria to 20 antimicrobial agents. International Journal of Clinical Experimental Medicine 8, 15423–15431.Google ScholarPubMed
Wei, G et al. (2015) Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and genotyping of Mycobacterium avium isolates of two tertiary tuberculosis designated hospital, China. Infection Genetics and Evolution 36, 141–146.10.1016/j.meegid.2015.09.015CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, YL et al. (2012) Molecular typing of Mycobacterium abscessus based on tandem-repeat polymorphism. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50, 3084–3088.10.1128/JCM.00753-12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, PR et al. (1988) Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 26, 2465–2466.10.1128/jcm.26.11.2465-2466.1988CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown-Elliott, BA et al. (2017) Rapidly growing mycobacteria. Microbiology Spectrum 5, TNMI7-0027-2016. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0027-2016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, H et al. (2019) Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial infection, South Korea, 2007–2016. Emerging Infectious Diseases 25, 569–572.10.3201/eid2503.181597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nie, W et al. (2014) Species identification of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus and Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii using rpoB and hsp65, and susceptibility testing to eight antibiotics. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 25, 170–174.10.1016/j.ijid.2014.02.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harada, T et al. (2012) Clinical and microbiological differences between Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium massiliense lung diseases. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 50, 3556–3561.10.1128/JCM.01175-12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adekambi, T et al. (2004) Amoebal coculture of ‘Mycobacterium massiliense’ sp. nov. from the sputum of a patient with hemoptoic pneumonia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 5493–5501.10.1128/JCM.42.12.5493-5501.2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, S et al. (2015) Investigation of the population structure of Mycobacterium abscessus complex strains using 17-locus variable number tandem repeat typing and the further distinction of Mycobacterium massiliense hsp65 genotypes. Journal of Medical Microbiology 64, 254–261.10.1099/jmm.0.000016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Ingen, J et al. (2009) Environmental sources of rapid growing nontuberculous mycobacteria causing disease in humans. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 15, 888–893.10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03013.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. MICs (μg/ml) of antimicrobials against M. abscessus and M. massiliense isolates

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of M. abscessus

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of M. massiliense

Figure 3

Fig. 3. VNTR allelic distribution in M. abscessus and M. massiliense clinical isolates

Figure 4

Table 2. Susceptibility to cefoxitin (FOX) and minocycline (MNO) of clustered and unclustered strains of M. abscessus and M. massiliense

Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material

Wang et al. supplementary material

Download Wang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.3 KB