Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:39:25.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making simple changes to the way a starchy carbohydrate meal is prepared can significantly reduce the postprandial glucose response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

T.M. Robertson ,
J.E. Brown  and
M.D. Robertson
T.M. Robertson
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH
J.E. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH
M.D. Robertson
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 77 , Issue OCE4: Summer Meeting, 10–12 July 2018, Getting energy balance right , 2018 , E166
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 

Resistant starches (RS) are classed as a dietary fibre because they are not digested and absorbed in the small intestine, instead they pass to the colon where they are metabolised by colonic bacteria. Consequently, they do not contribute to the postprandial glucose response. Replacing some of the available carbohydrate (CHO) in a meal, with RS, has been demonstrated to reduce postprandial glycaemia(Reference Behall, Scholfield and Hallfrisch1). Furthermore, different domestic rice cooking methods result in differing amounts of RS formation, in vitro (Reference Reed, Ai and Leutcher2). It is not known whether this translates into an effect on postprandial glucose metabolism, in vivo.

This study investigated whether changing the way a starchy carbohydrate meal was prepared would affect the postprandial glucose response. Ten healthy participants were recruited to this randomised crossover study. At each study visit they consumed an identical pasta meal (100 g pasta, 75 g tomato sauce and 10 g olive oil, providing 486 kcal energy, 77 g CHO, 13 g fat and 14 g protein) prepared in one of three ways: freshly cooked, chilled and consumed cold or chilled and reheated (microwave). All meals were consumed by all participants over the course of their three visits. Capillary blood samples were taken for 2 hr following the meal for subsequent glucose analysis.

Repeated measures ANOVA on postprandial glucose time-point data found a significant difference between meals (p < 0.01, Fig. 1), with ~1 mmol/l reduction observed in peak glucose and 41 % reduction in glucose incremental area under the curve between freshly cooked and chilled/reheated meals.

Fig. 1. Change in postprandial glucose response following consumption of the same pasta meal, prepared in three different ways, freshly cooked, chilled or chilled and reheated.

It is hypothesised that the greatest reduction, observed in the chilled/reheated meal, is a result of two types of RS formation in that meal; RS3 is formed by starch retrogradation when chilled, whereas RS5 is formed when a starchy carbohydrate is heated in the presence of lipid. However, this is still unproven as RS measurement was outside the scope of this pilot study. Nevertheless, these results demonstrate that making simple changes to food preparation methods, such as can easily be achieved in a domestic kitchen, can significantly reduce the postprandial glucose excursion. With the prevalence of diabetes increasing, the ability to change the health impact of the foods we eat, without changing the food itself, is of high importance.

References

1.Behall, KM, Scholfield, DJ, Hallfrisch, JG et al. (2006) Diabetes Care 29(5), 976–81.Google Scholar
2.Reed, MO, Ai, Y, Leutcher, JL et al. (2013) J Food Sci 78(7), H1076–81.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Change in postprandial glucose response following consumption of the same pasta meal, prepared in three different ways, freshly cooked, chilled or chilled and reheated.