Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:16:08.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The assessment of Type A behaviour pattern: results from a spouse-report approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

John T. Condon
John T. Condon*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Australia
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr John T. Condon, Department of Psychiatry, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, South Australia 5041, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Evidence is summarized suggesting that existing self-report questionnaires for the assessment of Type A behaviour pattern suffer from major methodological shortcomings. Type A individuals may be unwilling or unable to accurately self-report. The female spouse of the male patient can potentially provide a more objective, accurate ‘trait’ description less contaminated by ‘state’ variables such as diagnosis of illness or medication. The development of a spouse-report questionnaire is described and pilot data from 41 couples are presented, including comparison of the self-report and spouse-report responses on 46 questionnaire items and five scales. Unexpectedly high levels of agreement were found between self and spouse reports. Possible explanations of such agreement are critically examined.

Type
Preliminary Communication
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , August 1988 , pp. 747 - 755
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bass, C. (1984). Type A behaviour: recent developments. Journal of Psychosomatic Reasearch 28, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth-Kewley, S. & Friedman, H. S. (1987). Psychological predictors of heart disease: a quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin 101, 343–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, D. P. & Begley, T. M. (1987). Assessing the Type A behaviour pattern with the Jenkins Activity Survey. British Journal of Medical Psychology 60, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, D. G., Rosenman, R. H., Schiller, E. & Chesney, M. A. (1985). Consistency and variation among instruments purporting to measure the Type A behaviour pattern. Psychosomatic Medicine 47, 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, J. T. (1987). Type A coronary-prone behaviour pattern and pathological narcissism. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 21, 16–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology 24, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Williams, R. B., Haney, T. L. & Blumenthal, J. A. (1985). Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: relationship to angiographic findings. Psychosomatic Medicine 47, 219–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eaker, E. D., Haynes, S. G. & Feinleib, M. (1983). Spouse behaviour and coronary heart disease in men: prospective results from the Framingham heart study. American Journal of Epidemiology 118, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. Dryden: New York.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. (1986). The social desirability of the Type A behaviour pattern. Psychological Medicine 16, 805–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A., Borovoy, A. & Henley, S. (1986). Type A behaviour pattern, the recall of positive personality information and self evaluations. British Journal of Medical Psychology 59, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, J. H. & Smith, W. P. (1977). Social Psychology: An Attributional Approach. C. V. Mosby: St Louis.Google Scholar
Herman, S., Blumenthal, J. A., Haney, T, Williams, R. B. & Barefoot, J. (1986). Type As who think they are Type Bs: discrepancies between self-ratings and interview ratings of the Type A (coronary-prone) behaviour pattern. British Journal of Medical Psychology 59, 83–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herman, S., Blumenthal, J. A., Black, G. M., Chesney, M. S. & Margaret, A. (1981). Self-ratings of Type A (coronary prone) adults; do Type A's know they are Type A's? Psychosomatic Medicine 43, 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, C. D., Zyzanski, S. J. & Rosenman, R. H. (1979). Jenkins Activity Survey Manual. Psychological Corporation: New York.Google Scholar
Krantz, D. S., Contrada, R. J., LaRiccia, P. J., Anderson, J. R., Durel, L. A., Dembroski, T. M. & Weiss, T. (1987) Effects of betaadrenergic Stimulation and blockade on cardiovascular reactivity, affect, and Type A behaviour. Psychosomatic Medicine 49,146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuck, S. B., Kaplan, J. R., & Matthews, K. A (1986). Behavioural antecedents of coronary heart disease and atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis 6, 2–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, K. A. (1982). Psychological perspectives on the Type A behaviour pattern. Psychological Bulletin 91, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, K. A. & Haynes, S. G. (1986). Type A behaviour pattern and coronary disease risk. American Journal of Epidemiology 123, 923–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrtek, M. & Greenlee, M. W. (1984). Psychophysiology of Type A behaviour pattern: a critical analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 28, 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Pickering, T. G. (1985). Should studies of patients undergoing coronary angiography be used to evaluate the role of behavioural risk factors for coronary heart disease? Journal of Behavioural Medicine 8, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, V. A. (1982). Type A Behaviour Pattern: A Model for Research and Practice. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
Ray, J. J. (1984). Confusions in defining ‘A–B’ personality type: a rejoinder to Jenkins and Zyzanski. British Journal of Medical Psychology 57, 385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, J. J. & Bozek, R. (1980). Dissecting the A–B personality type. British Journal of Medical Psychology 53, 181–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rime, B. & Bonami, M. (1979). Overt and covert personality traits associated with coronary heart disease. British Journal of Medical Psychology 52, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenman, R. H. (1978). The interview method of assessment of the coronary prone behaviour pattern. In Coronary-Prone Behaviour. (ed. Dembroski, T. M., Weiss, S. M., Shields, J. L. Haynes, S. G. & Feinleib, M.), pp. 55–70. Springer-Verlag: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmeider, R., Friedrich, G., Neus, H., Rudell, H. & VonCiff, A. W (1983). The influence of beta-blockers on Type A cardiovascular reactivity and behaviour pattern in hypertensives. Psychosomatic Medicine 45, 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

An addendum has been issued for this article:

Addendum