Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:14:08.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The burden of mental disorders in Nepal between 1990 and 2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2023

Raja Ram Dhungana*
Affiliation:
Manmohan Memorial Institute of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia
Achyut Raj Pandey
Affiliation:
HERD International, Kathmandu, Nepal
Suira Joshi
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal
Nagendra P. Luitel
Affiliation:
Transcultural Psychosocial Organization Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Kedar Marahatta
Affiliation:
World Health Organization, Country Office for Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal
Krishna Kumar Aryal
Affiliation:
Bergen Centre for Ethics and Priority Setting in Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Meghnath Dhimal
Affiliation:
Nepal Health Research Council, Kathmandu Nepal
*
Corresponding author: Raja Ram Dhungana; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mental disorders are the leading cause of disease burden, affecting 13% of all people globally in 2019. However, there is scarce evidence on the burden of mental disorders in Nepal. This study used the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 data to assess the prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) of mental disorders in Nepal between 1990 and 2019. In 2019, there were 3.9 million (95% UI: 3.6–4.3) people with mental disorders in Nepal. Major depressive disorders (1.1 million; 95% UI: 0.9–1.2 million) and anxiety disorders (0.9 million; 95% UI: 0.8–1.2 million) were the most prevalent mental disorders in 2019. Attention deficit hyperactive disorder, conduct disorder, and autism spectrum disorders were present twice as high in males than in females. The proportional contribution of mental disorders to the total disease burden has tripled between 1990 (1.79% of all DALYs) and 2019 (5.5% of all DALYs). In conclusion, the proportional contribution of mental disorders to total disease burden has increased significantly in the last three decades in Nepal, with apparent sex and age differentials in prevalence and DALY rates. Effective program and policy responses are required to prepare the health system for reducing the growing burden of mental health disorders in Nepal.

Topics structure

Topic(s)

Subtopic(s)

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Impact statement

Nepal, having endured a decade-long internal armed conflict, and grappling with the aftermath of devastating events such as the 2015 earthquake, and other multitude of personal, social, cultural, economic, political, and environmental adversities, lacks a systematic analysis of the trend and burden of mental disorders. This study fills an important gap by providing estimates of the prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) associated with mental disorders in Nepal between 1990 and 2019. The study emphasizes the increasing burden of mental disorders in Nepal over the past three decades, with notable sex and age differences in prevalence and DALY rates. The findings indicate that in 2019, Nepal had approximately 3.9 million people with mental disorders, where major depressive disorders and anxiety disorders were the most prevalent conditions. The proportional contribution of mental disorders to the total disease burden has tripled between 1990 and 2019. The significant findings indicate a need for effective program and policy responses to address the growing burden of mental health disorders in Nepal. These findings may also inform the stakeholders for preparing the health system to meet the challenges posed by mental disorders.

Introduction

Mental disorders are the major cause of disease burden globally. The proportional contribution of mental disorders to total disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) has increased by 58% between 1990 and 2019 globally (Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2019). In 2019, mental disorders were the seventh leading cause of DALYs, affecting 970 million people around the world (Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2019). Mental disorders are also responsible for a high economic burden resulting from increased healthcare expenditure and productivity losses (Doran and Kinchin, Reference Doran and Kinchin2019). Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nepal are disproportionately affected by the burden of mental disorders. In 2019, most of the people with mental disorders were from LMICs (Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2019).

Exposure to several personal, social, cultural, economic, political, and environmental adversities including chronic health conditions, impoverishment, social exclusion, gender disadvantage, conflict, disasters, and migration, among others, could determine the development of mental disorders (Lund et al., Reference Lund, Brooke-Sumner, Baingana, Baron, Breuer, Chandra, Haushofer, Herrman, Jordans, Kieling, Medina-Mora, Morgan, Omigbodun, Tol, Patel and Saxena2018). Passing through the decade-long internal armed conflict during 1996–2006 (Medeiros et al., Reference Medeiros, Shrestha, Gaire and Orr2020), experiencing massive disasters like the earthquake in 2015 (Kane et al., Reference Kane, Luitel, Jordans, Kohrt, Weissbecker and Tol2018), high unemployment rate, a substantial rate of out-migration (Dhungana et al., Reference Dhungana, Aryal, Adhikary, Kc, Regmi, Devkota, Sharma, Wickramage, van Teijlingen and Simkhada2019), high incidence of domestic violence, high alcohol consumption rates, and the pernicious problem of poverty could be predisposing factors for poor mental health in Nepal (Luitel et al., Reference Luitel, Jordans, Sapkota, Tol, Kohrt, Thapa, Komproe and Sharma2013).

A recent national mental health survey reported that 10% of Nepalese adults had any mental disorder in their lifetime (Nepal Health Research Council, 2021). Other studies also provided estimates of particular mental disorders such as anxiety and depression in Nepal (Upadhyaya and Pol, Reference Upadhyaya and Pol2003; Khattri and Nepal, Reference Khattri and Nepal2006; Kohrt et al., Reference Kohrt, Speckman, Kunz, Baldwin, Upadhaya, Acharya, Sharma, Nepal and Worthman2009; Risal et al., Reference Risal, Manandhar, Linde, Steiner and Holen2016; Simkhada et al., Reference Simkhada, Van Teijlingen, Gurung and Wasti2018). However, these studies were conducted in specific samples (Clarke et al., Reference Clarke, Saville, Shrestha, Costello, King, Manandhar, Osrin and Prost2014; Dhungana et al., Reference Dhungana, Aryal, Adhikary, Kc, Regmi, Devkota, Sharma, Wickramage, van Teijlingen and Simkhada2019) or used different self-reported assessment tools with limited validity (Upadhyaya and Pol, Reference Upadhyaya and Pol2003; Khattri and Nepal, Reference Khattri and Nepal2006; Kohrt et al., Reference Kohrt, Speckman, Kunz, Baldwin, Upadhaya, Acharya, Sharma, Nepal and Worthman2009; Risal et al., Reference Risal, Manandhar, Linde, Steiner and Holen2016), which might have contributed to a wide variation in the reported rates of mental health problems in Nepal (Steel et al., Reference Steel, Chey, Silove, Marnane, Bryant and van Ommeren2009). Most importantly, neither of the previous studies attempted to estimate DALYs nor assessed the temporal trends in the prevalence of mental disorders in Nepal.

Moving beyond the studies whatsoever available that provide a descriptive picture on the prevalence of selected mental disorders in Nepal, and within the context of poor availability of and access to mental health care, a systematic analysis of the trend and burden of mental disorders can inform stakeholders about the magnitude and distribution of comprehensive measures of the burden of mental disorders in Nepal. A clear understanding of the extent of mental health problems in the population is crucial for planning and implementing effective prevention and management strategies in Nepal. Therefore, this study aimed to illustrate the trend and pattern of mental disorders in terms of their prevalence and DALYs from 1990 to 2019 using the data from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2019.

Methods

Study design and data sources

This study was based on the estimates provided by GBD 2019. We extracted the data from the official website (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool) of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) using the ‘GBD Compare’ data visualization tool (Institute of Health Metrics and Evaulation, 2020). GBD study collects a wide range of data from various sources, including vital registration systems, health surveys, disease registries, healthcare facilities, and more and analyzes those data using sophisticated statistical techniques and modeling to estimate the incidence and prevalence, deaths, and DALYs attributed to specific diseases. The GBD 2019 was a multinational collaborative study that covered 204 countries and regions and provided a comprehensive assessment of health loss for 369 diseases and injuries from 1990 to 2019 (Roth et al., Reference Roth, Mensah, Johnson, Addolorato, Ammirati, Baddour, Barengo, Beaton, Benjamin and Benziger2020). The GBD 2019 used a total of 281,577 data sources globally and 402 data sources from Nepal to estimate the disease burden. The data input sources comprised household survey data, hospital administrative data, and disease registries, among others.

Study outcomes

Outcome variables comprised of a list of mental disorders including major depressive disorders (major depressive disorder and dysthymia), anxiety disorders (a combined estimate of all subtypes), idiopathic developmental intellectual disability (estimated within the wider scope of intellectual disability impairment, encompassing cases of intellectual disability originating from unidentified sources once all other potential causes have been considered), dysthymia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, bipolar disorder (a combined estimate of all subtypes), autism spectrum disorders, schizophrenia, bulimia nervosa, anorexia nervosa, and other mental disorders. The mental disorders were defined based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases-10 criteria (Vos et al., Reference Vos, Lim, Abbafati, Abbas, Abbasi, Abbasifard, Abbasi-Kangevari, Abbastabar, Abd-Allah and Abdelalim2020).

Data analysis

A detailed description of the statistical modeling for mental disorders has been reported elsewhere (Vos et al., Reference Vos, Lim, Abbafati, Abbas, Abbasi, Abbasifard, Abbasi-Kangevari, Abbastabar, Abd-Allah and Abdelalim2020). In brief, Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) were calculated by multiplying prevalence estimates across different degrees of severity by a relevant disability weight. These disability weights were used to assess the level of health loss associated with each subsequent consequence (due to an illness or accident). Years of Life Lost (YLLs) were calculated by multiplying the number of deaths attributed to a specific cause by the predicted remaining years of life at the time of death, as determined by a standard life expectancy measurement. The combined sum of YLDs and YLLs was used to calculate DALYs. In cases where mental diseases were not officially recognized as direct causes of mortality, YLL computations were removed, and YLDs were employed as an approximation for DALYs.

We used the overall and sex-specific crude and age-standardized rates and the 95% uncertainty interval (UI) from 1990 to 2019 to compare and depict the trends of prevalence and DALYs associated with each mental disorder. We also plotted line graphs of every mental disorder across the age groups ranging from less than 1 year to above 80 years. STATA software version 16.1 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) was used to construct the graphs. The prevalence and DALY rates were presented per 100,000 population.

Results

In 2019, 3.9 million (95% UI: 3.6–4.3) Nepalese were estimated to have suffered from mental disorders, comprising 13.5% of the total population. The overall prevalence of mental disorders in 1990 was 12.4% (95%UI: 10.9–13.8). The prevalence rates did not differ significantly between 1990 and 2019 (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Trends in the prevalence of mental disorders and proportional contribution to overall DALYs between 1990 and 2019.

Prevalence of mental disorders

The age-standardized prevalence of mental disorders per 100,000 population was 13,372.2 (95% UI: 12,144.4, 14,565.75) in 2019 and 13,819.75 (12,444.59, 15,140.57) in 1990, respectively. In 2019, age-standardized prevalence cases of mental disorders per 100,000 population among males and females were 13,023.79 (95% UI: 11777.42, 14,245.63) and 13,617.99 (95% UI: 12372.86, 14,886.33), respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of mental disorders (per 100,000)

Major depressive disorders (age-standardized prevalence rate: 3,795.9, 95% UI: 3,265.67, 4,408.13), anxiety disorder (age-standardized prevalence rate: 3,277.32, 95% UI: 2,624.16, 4,134.75), and idiopathic developmental intellectual disability (age-standardrized prevalence rate: 2,503.69, 95% UI: 1,635.85, 3,380.81) were the three most prevalent mental disorders in 2019 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Prevalence of and DALYs due to mental disorders in 2019.

Major depressive disorders and anxiety disorders were more common in females than in males (Supplementary Table S1). Likewise, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, and autism spectrum disorders were more prevalent in children and adolescents (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Prevalence of mental disorders by age and sex in 2019.

Burden of mental disorders

All age DALYs per 100,000 population increased from 1,421.66 (95% UI: 1,036.74, 1,870.04) to 1,691.08 (95% UI: 1,244.47, 2,224.51) in both sexes; 1,375.63 (95% UI: 997.36, 1,803.81) to 1,545.37 (95% UI: 1,129.01, 2,027.12) in males; and 1,467.92 (95% UI: 1,068.11, 1,944.53) to 1,823.78 (95% UI: 1,330.85, 2,413) in females between 1990 and 2019 (Supplementary Table S2). The proportion of DALYs attributable to mental disorders has increased significantly from 1990 to 2019 (Figure 1) from 1.79% of total DALYs (95% UI: 1.34, 2.32) to 5.53% of total DALYs (95% UI: 4.22, 6.98) in both sexes; 1.7% of total DALYs (95% UI: 1.26, 2.21) to 4.73% of total DALYs (95% UI: 3.58, 6) in males; and 1.89% of total DALYs (95% UI: 1.41, 2.44) to 6.37% of total DALYs (4.89, 7.96) in females (Supplementary Table S2).

The major share of DALYs attributable to mental disorders was due to major depressive disorders and anxiety disorders (Figure 2). All age and age-standardized DALYs for major depressive disorder were 687.86 (95% UI: 465.55, 953.1) and 754.62 (95% UI: 510.96, 1,045.8) per 100,000 in 2019, respectively. Disaggregated by sex, both the overall and age-standardized DALY rates were higher in females compared to males for major depressive disorders. Age-standardized DALYs for major depressive disorders for 100,00 males and females were 605.29 (95% UI: 403.62, 842.67) and 883.21 (95% UI: 598.08, 1,228.91), respectively. Similarly, age-standardized DALYs for anxiety disorders was 309.51 (95% UI: 205.76, 434.63) per 100,000 in both sexes (Supplementary Table S3).

Discussion

We found the proportional contribution of mental disorders to the total disease burden has tripled between 1990 and 2019 in Nepal. Major depressive disorders and anxiety disorders, which were also more prevalent in females than males, were the top two contributors to the total prevalent cases and DALYs in 2019. Attention deficit hyperactive disorder, conduct disorder, and autism spectrum disorders were present twice as high in males than in females.

Our study found that one among seven Nepalese had a mental disorder in 2019. The rate is slightly greater than the prevalence of any mental disorder reported in the first national Mental Health survey-2020 in Nepal (Nepal Health Research Council, 2021) and consistent with the prevalence reported in the study (based on GBD estimates) from a neighboring country, India (14.3%) (Sagar et al., Reference Sagar, Dandona, Gururaj, Dhaliwal, Singh, Ferrari, Dua, Ganguli, Varghese, Chakma, Kumar, Shaji, Ambekar, Rangaswamy, Vijayakumar, Agarwal, Krishnankutty, Bhatia, Charlson, Chowdhary, Erskine, Glenn, Krish, Mantilla Herrera, Mutreja, Odell, Pal, Prakash, Santomauro, Shukla, Singh, Singh, Thakur, ThekkePurakkal, Varghese, Reddy, Swaminathan, Whiteford, Bekedam, Murray, Vos and Dandona2020). Comparing the overall prevalence of mental disorders within and across countries is still challenging due to inconsistencies in defining and estimating the burden of mental disorders (Kohrt and Hruschka, Reference Kohrt and Hruschka2010; Whiteford et al., Reference Whiteford, Ferrari and Vos2016). For example, GBD 2019 classified mental disorders, neurological disorders, and suicide separately, while other studies grouped them to estimate the burden of mental disorders (World Health Organization, 2018; Rehm and Shield, Reference Rehm and Shield2019). The national Mental Health Survey also included substance use disorders to report the prevalence of any mental disorder in Nepal (Nepal Health Research Council, 2021). Regarding the major depressive disorders, most of the South Asian counterparts including Bangladesh (4.4%), India (3.9%), Pakistan (3.0%), and Bhutan (3.7%) have a similar rate like Nepal.

The age-standardized prevalence of most of the mental disorders was not found identical by sex. Major depressive disorders and anxiety disorders were prevalent in females, whereas attention deficit, hyperactive disorder, conduct disorder, and autism spectrum disorders were manifested predominantly in males. Similar phenomena of sex-deferential distribution of mental disorders were observed in India and globally (Erskine et al., Reference Erskine, Ferrari, Polanczyk, Moffitt, Murray, Vos, Whiteford and Scott2014; Rehm and Shield, Reference Rehm and Shield2019; Sagar et al., Reference Sagar, Dandona, Gururaj, Dhaliwal, Singh, Ferrari, Dua, Ganguli, Varghese, Chakma, Kumar, Shaji, Ambekar, Rangaswamy, Vijayakumar, Agarwal, Krishnankutty, Bhatia, Charlson, Chowdhary, Erskine, Glenn, Krish, Mantilla Herrera, Mutreja, Odell, Pal, Prakash, Santomauro, Shukla, Singh, Singh, Thakur, ThekkePurakkal, Varghese, Reddy, Swaminathan, Whiteford, Bekedam, Murray, Vos and Dandona2020). Some of the previous studies have indicated that the higher susceptibility of women to depressive and anxiety disorders could be linked to gender discrimination, gender-based violence, antenatal and postnatal stress, and adverse socio-cultural norms (Beydoun et al., Reference Beydoun, Beydoun, Kaufman, Lo and Zonderman2012; Albert, Reference Albert2015; Sagar et al., Reference Sagar, Dandona, Gururaj, Dhaliwal, Singh, Ferrari, Dua, Ganguli, Varghese, Chakma, Kumar, Shaji, Ambekar, Rangaswamy, Vijayakumar, Agarwal, Krishnankutty, Bhatia, Charlson, Chowdhary, Erskine, Glenn, Krish, Mantilla Herrera, Mutreja, Odell, Pal, Prakash, Santomauro, Shukla, Singh, Singh, Thakur, ThekkePurakkal, Varghese, Reddy, Swaminathan, Whiteford, Bekedam, Murray, Vos and Dandona2020). Likewise, a striking male bias in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders and attention deficit hyperactive disorder could also be explained by sex-differential genetic and hormonal factors (Werling and Geschwind, Reference Werling and Geschwind2013).

No evidence for an increased prevalence of overall mental disorders was found in Nepal between 1990 and 2019. Although the crude number of cases slightly increased both in males and females, the age-standardized prevalence of overall mental disorders decreased from 13.8% to 13.4% in the same period. The discrepancy between crude and age-standardized rates is mainly explained by population growth and changing age structures (Baxter et al., Reference Baxter, Scott, Ferrari, Norman, Vos and Whiteford2014). This finding is also opposite to the general expectation that the prevalence of mental disorders might have significantly increased during the last two decades when psychological stressors including conflicts, natural disasters, and socio-economic adversities were abundant in Nepal. That might be because of the underreporting of mental disorders due to the stigma associated with mental illness in the community (Luitel et al., Reference Luitel, Jordans, Sapkota, Tol, Kohrt, Thapa, Komproe and Sharma2013; Devkota et al., Reference Devkota, Basnet, Thapa and Subedi2021). The lack of trained health workers and accessible care might also have partly hindered the detection of cases, thereby causing an underestimation of mental disorders in Nepal (Upadhaya et al., Reference Upadhaya, Jordans, Pokhrel, Gurung, Adhikari, Petersen and Komproe2017).

Unlike the prevalence, the DALYs for mental disorders marginally increased between 1990 and 2019. The DALYs due to mental disorders had a larger contribution to the total burden of disease, which has tripled in the last three decades. The multiplication of proportional contribution is caused by the decline in maternal and child mortality and deaths due to other communicable diseases. The proportional contribution of communicable maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to total DALYs decreased from 70% to 29% between 1990 and 2019 (Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2019). The contribution of mental disorders to total disease burden (5.5% of all DALYs in 2019) in Nepal is comparable with that of India (4·7% of the total DALYs in 2017) (Sagar et al., Reference Sagar, Dandona, Gururaj, Dhaliwal, Singh, Ferrari, Dua, Ganguli, Varghese, Chakma, Kumar, Shaji, Ambekar, Rangaswamy, Vijayakumar, Agarwal, Krishnankutty, Bhatia, Charlson, Chowdhary, Erskine, Glenn, Krish, Mantilla Herrera, Mutreja, Odell, Pal, Prakash, Santomauro, Shukla, Singh, Singh, Thakur, ThekkePurakkal, Varghese, Reddy, Swaminathan, Whiteford, Bekedam, Murray, Vos and Dandona2020) and Mediterranean regions (4·7% of the total DALYs in 2015) (Charara et al., Reference Charara, El Bcheraoui, Khalil, Moradi-Lakeh, Afshin, Kassebaum, Collison, Krohn, Chew, Daoud, Charlson, Colombara, Degenhardt, Ehrenkranz, Erskine, Ferrari, Kutz, Leung, Santomauro, Wang, Whiteford, Abajobir, Abd-Allah, Abraha, Abu-Raddad, Ahmad Kiadaliri, Ahmadi, Ahmed, Ahmed, Al Lami, Alam, Alasfoor, Alizadeh-Navaei, Alkaabi, Al-Maskari, Al-Raddadi, Altirkawi, Anber, Ansari, Asayesh, Asghar, Atey, Awoke Ayele, Bärnighausen, Bacha, Barac, Barker-Collo, Baune, Bazargan-Hejazi, Bedi, Bensenor, Berhane, Beyene, Bhutta, Boneya, Borschmann, Breitborde, Butt, Catalá-López, Ciobanu, Danawi, Deribew, Dharmaratne, Doyle, Endries, Faraon Emerito, Faro, Farvid, Fekadu, Fereshtehnejad, Fischer, Gebrehiwot, Giref, Gishu Melkamu, Goulart, Habtewold, Hamadeh, Hambisa, Hamidi, Haro, Hassanvand, Horita, Hsairi, Huang, Husseini, Jakovljevic, James, Jonas, Kasaeian, Khader, Khan, Khoja, Khosravi, Khubchandani, Kim, Kim, Kokubo, Koyanagi, Defo, Larson, Latif, Lee, Leshargie, Leung, Lo, Lunevicius, Magdy Abd El Razek, Magdy Abd El Razek, Majdzadeh, Majeed, Malekzadeh, Martinez-Raga, Masoudi Farid, Mazidi, McGrath, Memish, Mendoza, Mengesha, Mengistie, Mezgebe, Miller, Mitchell, Mohammadi, Mohammed, Obermeyer, Ogbo, Palomares Castillo, Papachristou, Patten, Patton, Pervaiz, Phillips, Pourmalek, Qorbani, Radfar, Rafay, Rahimi-Movaghar, Rai, Rawaf, Rawaf, Refaat, Rezaei, Rezai, Roshandel, Safdarian, Safiabadi, Safiri, Sagar, Sahraian, Salamati, Samy, Sartorius, Saylan, Seedat, Sepanlou, Shaikh, Shamsizadeh, DAS, Singh, Sobaih, Stein, Suliankatchi Abdulkader, Sykes, Tabarés-Seisdedos, Tabb, Tehrani-Banihashemi, Temsah, Terkawi, Topor-Madry, Ukwaja, Uthman, Vollset, Wakayo, Wang, Werdecker, Westerman, Workicho, Yaghoubi, Yimam, Yonemoto, Younis, Yu, Zaki, Zein, Jumaan, Vos, Hay, Naghavi, Murray and Mokdad2018). Most of the DALYs due to mental disorders are contributed by major depressive disorders, followed by anxiety disorders, idiopathic developmental intellectual disability, and schizophrenia in Nepal and globally (Charara et al., Reference Charara, El Bcheraoui, Khalil, Moradi-Lakeh, Afshin, Kassebaum, Collison, Krohn, Chew, Daoud, Charlson, Colombara, Degenhardt, Ehrenkranz, Erskine, Ferrari, Kutz, Leung, Santomauro, Wang, Whiteford, Abajobir, Abd-Allah, Abraha, Abu-Raddad, Ahmad Kiadaliri, Ahmadi, Ahmed, Ahmed, Al Lami, Alam, Alasfoor, Alizadeh-Navaei, Alkaabi, Al-Maskari, Al-Raddadi, Altirkawi, Anber, Ansari, Asayesh, Asghar, Atey, Awoke Ayele, Bärnighausen, Bacha, Barac, Barker-Collo, Baune, Bazargan-Hejazi, Bedi, Bensenor, Berhane, Beyene, Bhutta, Boneya, Borschmann, Breitborde, Butt, Catalá-López, Ciobanu, Danawi, Deribew, Dharmaratne, Doyle, Endries, Faraon Emerito, Faro, Farvid, Fekadu, Fereshtehnejad, Fischer, Gebrehiwot, Giref, Gishu Melkamu, Goulart, Habtewold, Hamadeh, Hambisa, Hamidi, Haro, Hassanvand, Horita, Hsairi, Huang, Husseini, Jakovljevic, James, Jonas, Kasaeian, Khader, Khan, Khoja, Khosravi, Khubchandani, Kim, Kim, Kokubo, Koyanagi, Defo, Larson, Latif, Lee, Leshargie, Leung, Lo, Lunevicius, Magdy Abd El Razek, Magdy Abd El Razek, Majdzadeh, Majeed, Malekzadeh, Martinez-Raga, Masoudi Farid, Mazidi, McGrath, Memish, Mendoza, Mengesha, Mengistie, Mezgebe, Miller, Mitchell, Mohammadi, Mohammed, Obermeyer, Ogbo, Palomares Castillo, Papachristou, Patten, Patton, Pervaiz, Phillips, Pourmalek, Qorbani, Radfar, Rafay, Rahimi-Movaghar, Rai, Rawaf, Rawaf, Refaat, Rezaei, Rezai, Roshandel, Safdarian, Safiabadi, Safiri, Sagar, Sahraian, Salamati, Samy, Sartorius, Saylan, Seedat, Sepanlou, Shaikh, Shamsizadeh, DAS, Singh, Sobaih, Stein, Suliankatchi Abdulkader, Sykes, Tabarés-Seisdedos, Tabb, Tehrani-Banihashemi, Temsah, Terkawi, Topor-Madry, Ukwaja, Uthman, Vollset, Wakayo, Wang, Werdecker, Westerman, Workicho, Yaghoubi, Yimam, Yonemoto, Younis, Yu, Zaki, Zein, Jumaan, Vos, Hay, Naghavi, Murray and Mokdad2018; Rehm and Shield, Reference Rehm and Shield2019; Sagar et al., Reference Sagar, Dandona, Gururaj, Dhaliwal, Singh, Ferrari, Dua, Ganguli, Varghese, Chakma, Kumar, Shaji, Ambekar, Rangaswamy, Vijayakumar, Agarwal, Krishnankutty, Bhatia, Charlson, Chowdhary, Erskine, Glenn, Krish, Mantilla Herrera, Mutreja, Odell, Pal, Prakash, Santomauro, Shukla, Singh, Singh, Thakur, ThekkePurakkal, Varghese, Reddy, Swaminathan, Whiteford, Bekedam, Murray, Vos and Dandona2020).

Over the past few years, several initiatives have been taken to improve mental health services in Nepal. Recently, the Ministry of Health and Population (MoHP) has developed a range of evidence-based training packages in mental health care for primary and community healthcare workers and has included six new psychotropic medicines in the list of free drugs (Luitel et al., Reference Luitel, Breuer, Adhikari, Kohrt, Lund, Komproe and Jordans2020). Four priority mental and neurological disorders including depression, anxiety, psychosis, and epilepsy have also been included in the basic health care package (Ministry of Health and Population, 2018). Even though the government of Nepal has now given much emphasis to making mental health services available (i.e., addressing supply-side barriers) in the primary and community health care systems, evidence suggests that making mental health services available does not necessarily improve the help-seeking behaviors of people with mental health care. Effective implementation of mental health services in primary care has been challenging due to limited mental health awareness, low perceived need for mental health services, and high level of stigma in the wider Nepalese community which could negatively affect help-seeking and hence in early detection and management of people with mental health conditions (Luitel et al., Reference Luitel, Breuer, Adhikari, Kohrt, Lund, Komproe and Jordans2020; Devkota et al., Reference Devkota, Basnet, Thapa and Subedi2021). Therefore, community-level interventions should be developed for the promotion of mental health and prevention of mental disorders. The community-level intervention should target minimizing demand-side barriers which are considered as major barriers to mental health care (Luitel et al., Reference Luitel, Breuer, Adhikari, Kohrt, Lund, Komproe and Jordans2020).

The major limitations of the current study are embedded with the GBD method of estimating the burden of mental disorders. Some argue that the current method of estimating mental disorders underestimates the burden of mental illness (Whiteford et al., Reference Whiteford, Ferrari and Vos2016). The reason is due to the overlap between psychiatric and neurological disorders and excluding suicide and self-harm from the mental disorder category, among others (Whiteford et al., Reference Whiteford, Ferrari and Vos2016). The GBD findings produced through modeling of a number of direct population data and covariates from Nepal could introduce biases in the estimates. However, it is important to note that this study provides the best possible estimates of the burden of mental disorders using the available data in Nepal. Likewise, this is also the first study to report DALYs due to mental disorders in Nepal. Our study findings are important in terms of illustrating the growing burden of mental disorders in Nepal and informing policymaking and program design in the Nepalese context. A clear understanding of the magnitude and distribution of the prevalence and burden of each mental disorder may help stakeholders tailor the psychosocial and mental health interventions specific to the disease, age, and sex in Nepal.

Conclusions

The current study demonstrated that the proportional contribution of mental disorders to total DALYs is growing in Nepal. The burden of mental disorders largely varies by sex and age. To address the growing burden of mental disorders, there is a need for accelerating age, sex, and disease-specific promotive, preventive, and curative mental health interventions in Nepal.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.55.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.55.

Data availability statement

Data used in the study are publicly available on the official website of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington for allowing access to the data.

Author contribution

R.R.D. and A.R.P. conceptualized and interpreted the findings of the study. R.R.D. analyzed the data and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. A.R.P., S.J., N.L., K.M., K.A., M.D. interpreted the findings and reviewed the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Financial support

The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency for this work.

Competing interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Ethics standard

This study used the GBD data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington. No ethical approval is required.

References

Albert, PR (2015) Why is depression more prevalent in women? Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience: JPN 40(4), 219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, AJ, Scott, KM, Ferrari, AJ, Norman, RE, Vos, T and Whiteford, HA (2014) Challenging the myth of an “epidemic” of common mental disorders: Trends in the global prevalence of anxiety and depression between 1990 and 2010. Depression and Anxiety 31(6), 506516. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beydoun, HA, Beydoun, MA, Kaufman, JS, Lo, B and Zonderman, AB (2012) Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine 75(6), 959975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charara, R, El Bcheraoui, C, Khalil, I, Moradi-Lakeh, M, Afshin, A, Kassebaum, NJ, Collison, M, Krohn, KJ, Chew, A, Daoud, F, Charlson, FJ, Colombara, D, Degenhardt, L, Ehrenkranz, R, Erskine, HE, Ferrari, AJ, Kutz, M, Leung, J, Santomauro, D, Wang, H, Whiteford, HA, Abajobir, AA, Abd-Allah, F, Abraha, HN, Abu-Raddad, LJ, Ahmad Kiadaliri, A, Ahmadi, A, Ahmed, KY, Ahmed, MB, Al Lami, FH, Alam, K, Alasfoor, D, Alizadeh-Navaei, R, Alkaabi, JM, Al-Maskari, F, Al-Raddadi, R, Altirkawi, KA, Anber, N, Ansari, H, Asayesh, H, Asghar, RJ, Atey, TM, Awoke Ayele, T, Bärnighausen, T, Bacha, U, Barac, A, Barker-Collo, SL, Baune, BT, Bazargan-Hejazi, S, Bedi, N, Bensenor, IM, Berhane, A, Beyene, AS, Bhutta, ZA, Boneya, DJ, Borschmann, R, Breitborde, NJK, Butt, ZA, Catalá-López, F, Ciobanu, LG, Danawi, H, Deribew, A, Dharmaratne, SD, Doyle, KE, Endries, AY, Faraon Emerito, JA, Faro, A, Farvid, MS, Fekadu, W, Fereshtehnejad, S-M, Fischer, F, Gebrehiwot, TT, Giref, AZ, Gishu Melkamu, D, Goulart, AC, Habtewold, TD, Hamadeh, RR, Hambisa, MT, Hamidi, S, Haro, JM, Hassanvand, MS, Horita, N, Hsairi, M, Huang, H, Husseini, A, Jakovljevic, MB, James, SL, Jonas, JB, Kasaeian, A, Khader, YS, Khan, EA, Khoja, ATA, Khosravi, A, Khubchandani, J, Kim, D, Kim, YJ, Kokubo, Y, Koyanagi, A, Defo, BK, Larson, HJ, Latif, AA, Lee, PH, Leshargie, CT, Leung, R, Lo, L-T, Lunevicius, R, Magdy Abd El Razek, H, Magdy Abd El Razek, M, Majdzadeh, R, Majeed, A, Malekzadeh, R, Martinez-Raga, J, Masoudi Farid, H, Mazidi, M, McGrath, JJ, Memish, ZA, Mendoza, W, Mengesha, MM, Mengistie, MA, Mezgebe, HB, Miller, TR, Mitchell, PB, Mohammadi, A, Mohammed, S, Obermeyer, CM, Ogbo, FA, Palomares Castillo, E, Papachristou, C, Patten, SB, Patton, GC, Pervaiz, A, Phillips, MR, Pourmalek, F, Qorbani, M, Radfar, A, Rafay, A, Rahimi-Movaghar, V, Rai, RK, Rawaf, DL, Rawaf, S, Refaat, AH, Rezaei, S, Rezai, MS, Roshandel, G, Safdarian, M, Safiabadi, M, Safiri, S, Sagar, R, Sahraian, MA, Salamati, P, Samy, AM, Sartorius, B, Saylan, MI, Seedat, S, Sepanlou, SG, Shaikh, MA, Shamsizadeh, M, DAS, Silva, Singh, JA, Sobaih, BHA, Stein, DJ, Suliankatchi Abdulkader, R, Sykes, BL, Tabarés-Seisdedos, R, Tabb, KM, Tehrani-Banihashemi, A, Temsah, M-H, Terkawi, AS, Topor-Madry, R, Ukwaja, KN, Uthman, OA, Vollset, SE, Wakayo, T, Wang, Y-P, Werdecker, A, Westerman, R, Workicho, A, Yaghoubi, M, Yimam, HH, Yonemoto, N, Younis, MZ, Yu, C, Zaki, MES, Zein, B, Jumaan, AO, Vos, T, Hay, SI, Naghavi, M, Murray, CJL, Mokdad, AH and Collaborators GBDEMRMH (2018) The burden of mental disorders in the Eastern Mediterranean region, 1990–2015: Findings from the global burden of disease 2015 study. International Journal of Public Health 63(1), 2537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-1006-1Google Scholar
Clarke, K, Saville, N, Shrestha, B, Costello, A, King, M, Manandhar, D, Osrin, D and Prost, A (2014) Predictors of psychological distress among postnatal mothers in rural Nepal: A cross-sectional community-based study. Journal of Affective Disorders 156, 7686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.11.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devkota, G, Basnet, P, Thapa, B and Subedi, M (2021) Factors affecting utilization of mental health services from primary health care (PHC) facilities of western hilly district of Nepal. PLoS One 16(4), e0250694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250694CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhungana, RR, Aryal, N, Adhikary, P, Kc, RK, Regmi, PR, Devkota, B, Sharma, GN, Wickramage, K, van Teijlingen, E and Simkhada, P (2019) Psychological morbidity in Nepali cross-border migrants in India: A community based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 19(1), 1534. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7881-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doran, CM and Kinchin, I (2019) A review of the economic impact of mental illness. Australian Health Review 43(1), 4348. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah16115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erskine, HE, Ferrari, AJ, Polanczyk, GV, Moffitt, TE, Murray, CJ, Vos, T, Whiteford, HA and Scott, JG (2014) The global burden of conduct disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in 2010. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 55(4), 328336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12186CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (2019) GBD compare data visualisation. Available at https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed 10 June 2021).Google Scholar
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaulation (2020) GBD compare. Available at https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed 2021).Google Scholar
Kane, JC, Luitel, NP, Jordans, MJD, Kohrt, BA, Weissbecker, I and Tol, WA (2018) Mental health and psychosocial problems in the aftermath of the Nepal earthquakes: Findings from a representative cluster sample survey. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 27(3), 301310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796016001104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khattri, JB and Nepal, MK (2006) Study of depression among geriatric population in Nepal. Nepal Medical College Journal 8, 220223.Google ScholarPubMed
Kohrt, BA and Hruschka, DJ (2010) Nepali concepts of psychological trauma: The role of idioms of distress, ethnopsychology and ethnophysiology in alleviating suffering and preventing stigma. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 34(2), 322352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohrt, BA, Speckman, RA, Kunz, RD, Baldwin, JL, Upadhaya, N, Acharya, NR, Sharma, VD, Nepal, MK and Worthman, CM (2009) Culture in psychiatric epidemiology: Using ethnography and multiple mediator models to assess the relationship of caste with depression and anxiety in Nepal. Annals of Human Biology 36(3), 261280. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460902839194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luitel, NP, Breuer, E, Adhikari, A, Kohrt, BA, Lund, C, Komproe, IH and Jordans, MJD (2020) Process evaluation of a district mental healthcare plan in Nepal: A mixed-methods case study. BJPsych Open 6(4), e77. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luitel, NP, Jordans, MJ, Sapkota, RP, Tol, WA, Kohrt, BA, Thapa, SB, Komproe, IH and Sharma, B (2013) Conflict and mental health: A cross-sectional epidemiological study in Nepal. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 48(2), 183193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, C, Brooke-Sumner, C, Baingana, F, Baron, EC, Breuer, E, Chandra, P, Haushofer, J, Herrman, H, Jordans, M, Kieling, C, Medina-Mora, ME, Morgan, E, Omigbodun, O, Tol, W, Patel, V and Saxena, S (2018) Social determinants of mental disorders and the sustainable development goals: A systematic review of reviews. Lancet Psychiatry 5(4), 357369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30060-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medeiros, E, Shrestha, PN, Gaire, H and Orr, DMR (2020) Life after armed group involvement in Nepal: A clinical ethnography of psychological well-being of former “child soldiers” over time. Transcultural Psychiatry 57(1), 183196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461519850338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Health and Population (2018) Basic health care package. Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NBHrLNamYs9Ned37JweCfig-f_5WNh_w/view (accessed 07 May 2021).Google Scholar
Nepal Health Research Council (2021) National Mental Health Survey, Nepal-2020: Factsheet (Adults). Available at http://nhrc.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Factsheet-Adults-1.pdf (accessed 30 June 2021).Google Scholar
Rehm, J and Shield, KD (2019) Global burden of disease and the impact of mental and addictive disorders. Current Psychiatry Reports 21(2), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-019-0997-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risal, A, Manandhar, K, Linde, M, Steiner, TJ and Holen, A (2016) Anxiety and depression in Nepal: Prevalence, comorbidity and associations. BMC Psychiatry 16(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0810-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, GA, Mensah, GA, Johnson, CO, Addolorato, G, Ammirati, E, Baddour, LM, Barengo, NC, Beaton, AZ, Benjamin, EJ and Benziger, CP (2020) Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: Update from the GBD 2019 study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 76(25), 29823021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagar, R, Dandona, R, Gururaj, G, Dhaliwal, RS, Singh, A, Ferrari, A, Dua, T, Ganguli, A, Varghese, M, Chakma, JK, Kumar, GA, Shaji, KS, Ambekar, A, Rangaswamy, T, Vijayakumar, L, Agarwal, V, Krishnankutty, RP, Bhatia, R, Charlson, F, Chowdhary, N, Erskine, HE, Glenn, SD, Krish, V, Mantilla Herrera, AM, Mutreja, P, Odell, CM, Pal, PK, Prakash, S, Santomauro, D, Shukla, DK, Singh, R, Singh, RKL, Thakur, JS, ThekkePurakkal, AS, Varghese, CM, Reddy, KS, Swaminathan, S, Whiteford, H, Bekedam, HJ, Murray, CJL, Vos, T and Dandona, L (2020) The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990–2017. Lancet Psychiatry 7(2), 148161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30475-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simkhada, P, Van Teijlingen, E, Gurung, M and Wasti, SP (2018) A survey of health problems of Nepalese female migrants workers in the middle-east and Malaysia. BMC International Health and Human Rights 18(1), 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, Z, Chey, T, Silove, D, Marnane, C, Bryant, RA and van Ommeren, M (2009) Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 302(5), 537549. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Upadhaya, N, Jordans, MJD, Pokhrel, R, Gurung, D, Adhikari, RP, Petersen, I and Komproe, IH (2017) Current situations and future directions for mental health system governance in Nepal: Findings from a qualitative study. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 11, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-017-0145-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Upadhyaya, KD and Pol, K (2003) A mental health prevalence survey in two developing towns of western region. Journal of Nepal Medical Association 42(150), 328330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, T, Lim, SS, Abbafati, C, Abbas, KM, Abbasi, M, Abbasifard, M, Abbasi-Kangevari, M, Abbastabar, H, Abd-Allah, F and Abdelalim, A (2020) Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 396(10258), 12041222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werling, DM and Geschwind, DH (2013) Sex differences in autism spectrum disorders. Current Opinion in Neurology 26(2), 146153. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835ee548CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiteford, HA, Ferrari, AJ and Vos, T (2016) Challenges to estimating the true global burden of mental disorders. Lancet Psychiatry 3(5), 402403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30026-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (2018) The Burden of Mental Disorders in the Region of the Americas. Washington, DC: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Trends in the prevalence of mental disorders and proportional contribution to overall DALYs between 1990 and 2019.

Figure 1

Table 1. Prevalence of mental disorders (per 100,000)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Prevalence of and DALYs due to mental disorders in 2019.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Prevalence of mental disorders by age and sex in 2019.

Supplementary material: File

Dhungana et al. supplementary material 1
Download undefined(File)
File 25.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dhungana et al. supplementary material 2
Download undefined(File)
File 16.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dhungana et al. supplementary material 3
Download undefined(File)
File 16.7 KB

Author comment: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Editors,

We would like to submit our manuscript entitled “The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019” to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health for your consideration.

Mental disorders are the major cause of disease burden globally. Despite having a dire situation of mental health system in Nepal (which is highlighted by our co-authors elsewhere[1-4]), little is known about the burden of mental disorders in Nepal.

In the current study, we thoroughly investigated and quantified the burden of mental disorders across different age groups and sex in Nepal using the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. We found that the contribution of mental disorders to total disease burden has tripled between 1990 and 2019 in Nepal. Our study findings are important in terms of illustrating the growing burden of mental disorders in Nepal and informing policymaking and programme designs in the Nepalese context.

We would be very grateful if you would consider the manuscript for publication in your journal.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Raja Ram Dhungana

Kathmandu, Nepal

References

1. Luitel NP, Jordans MJ, Adhikari A, Upadhaya N, Hanlon C, Lund C, et al. Mental health care in Nepal: current situation and challenges for development of a district mental health care plan. Confl Health. 2015;9:3. Epub 2015/02/20. doi: 10.1186/s13031-014-0030-5. PubMed PMID: 25694792; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4331482.

2. Luitel NP, Garman EC, Jordans MJD, Lund C. Change in treatment coverage and barriers to mental health care among adults with depression and alcohol use disorder: a repeat cross sectional community survey in Nepal. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1350. Epub 2019/10/24. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7663-7. PubMed PMID: 31640647; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6806507.

3. Luitel NP, Jordans MJD, Kohrt BA, Rathod SD, Komproe IH. Treatment gap and barriers for mental health care: A cross-sectional community survey in Nepal. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183223. Epub 2017/08/18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183223. PubMed PMID: 28817734; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5560728.

4. Dhungana RR, Aryal N, Adhikary P, Kc RK, Regmi PR, Devkota B, et al. Psychological morbidity in Nepali cross-border migrants in India: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1534. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7881-z.

Review: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The manuscript is well written. This particular study has assessed the prevalence and disability-adjusted life-years (DALY) of mental disorders in Nepal between 1990 and 2019 using the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The authors concluded that the proportional contribution of mental disorders to the total disease burden has increased significantly in the last three decades in Nepal which is a crucial and important finding. However, the following concerns are needed to be addressed

Major Comments

1. The method section of the paper should be more detailed. The authors should mention the study design and steps of data extraction, inclusion, and exclusion criteria clearly (for example PRISMA). Although it is mentioned “A detailed description of the metrics, data sources, and statistical modeling for mental disorders have been reported elsewhere (Vos et al. 2020)” at least a minimum description is required to be incorporated in the method section of the manuscript for clarity.

2. Please add how you define DALY and mental disorder for this particular paper in simple sentences in the method section, can add a subheading “study outcome” if possible. “Mental disorder” is a general term.

Minor comments:

1. Impact “Statement” Spelling needs to be corrected ( page 1, before abstract).

2. The study design should be mentioned in the abstract.

Review: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Dear authors,

You have highlighted very well the prevalence of common mental illnesses and the disability associated with the diseases based on the findings of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019. In the context of Nepal’s developing mental health policy and planning in recent years, this study will be extremely important to the relevant stakeholders in promoting mental health in Nepal. The only caveat is that the finding has to depend on the secondary data from the GBD study. I found the manuscript very well written and will be a great asset in the field of global mental health.

Recommendation: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R0/PR4

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R1/PR6

Comments

Dear Editor,

We would appreciate for your and reviewers’ time and thoughtful review of our manuscript titled " The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019”. Insightful comments and constructive feedback from Editor and reviewers were invaluable in refining the quality and depth of our work.

We have carefully addressed each of comments and suggestions made by Editor and reviewers, and we are pleased to provide a detailed response outlining the revisions we have made to the manuscript. Your feedback has guided us in enhancing the clarity, methodology, and overall coherence of the paper.

Below, we summarize the key changes we have implemented based on your feedback:

-Structured the manuscript based on journal guidelines,

-Included graphical abstract,

-Revised methods section,

-Provided point to point responses to the reviewers’ comment

Regards,

Dr Raja Ram Dhungana

Corresponding Authors

[email protected]

Kathmandu, Nepal

Review: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

I have been actively involved in promoting mental health care in rural Nepal since 2017. However, I have no other conflict of interest on this manuscript or in the study findings.

Comments

Dear authors,

I appreciate your efforts to bring these important findings related to the burden of mental illnesses in Nepal. Your manuscript is very well written. I like the discussion part where you have tried to address some of the limitations of the study. Your article will be an invaluable asset to the literature related to mental health in LMICs.

Recommendation: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: The Burden of Mental Disorders in Nepal between 1990-2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.