Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T10:01:38.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An update on the management of thyroid nodules: rationalising the guidelines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2022

L Q Li
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland
O Hilmi*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland
J England
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
N Tolley
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
*
Corresponding author: Mr Omar Hilmi; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Guidance for the management of thyroid nodules has evolved over time, from initial evaluation based predominantly on clinical grounds to now including the established role of ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology in their assessment. There is, however, significant variation in the management of thyroid nodules depending on which national guidelines are followed. In addition, there are certain clinical situations such as pregnancy and paediatric thyroid nodules that have differing evaluation priorities.

Objectives

This review aimed to provide an overview of currently accepted practices for the initial investigation and subsequent management of patients with thyroid nodules for the non-specialist. The review also addresses areas of variance between the systems in common clinical use, as well as newer, evolving technologies, including molecular testing in the evaluation of malignancy in thyroid nodules.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Introduction

Thyroid nodules are an increasingly common clinical problem. They may be discovered by palpation during physical examination or incidentally during radiological evaluation for unrelated reasons. They are four times more common in women, and their incidence increases with age and low iodine intake.Reference Mazzaferri1 Whilst palpable nodules are found in around 5 per cent of the population, up to 70 per cent of the population are revealed to have thyroid nodules on high-resolution ultrasound.Reference Mazzaferri1Reference Ezzat, Sarti, Cain and Braunstein3

Thyroid nodules are clinically important because of their risk of malignancy. Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy, representing 1 per cent of all malignancies.4 Differentiated thyroid cancer, which includes papillary and follicular cancer, comprises the vast majority (90 per cent) of all thyroid cancers. The reported prevalence of malignancy in nodules evaluated by biopsy varies from 4 to 6.5 per cent, which is largely independent of nodule size.Reference Lin, Chao, Huang, Chen, Chang and Hsueh5,Reference Werk, Vernon, Gonzalez, Ungaro and McCoy6 Thyroid nodules may also cause thyroid dysfunction, and, rarely, compressive symptoms.

Epidemiological studies suggest a small but real increase in the incidence of thyroid cancer, likely attributed to both exposure to environmental risk factors and more widespread use of diagnostic imaging and medical surveillance.Reference Cabanillas, McFadden and Durante7 The latter has facilitated the identification of small subclinical thyroid nodules and small papillary thyroid cancers. This has raised concerns over the cost and potential morbidity associated with the short- and long-term management of these patients. There is a clear need for a more refined, tailored and careful approach to the management of these increasingly prevalent lesions. Similar considerations are required for nodules proven to be malignant but with a low-risk phenotype. These can be safely managed through more conservative surgery or active surveillance programmes.Reference Ito, Uruno, Nakano, Takamura, Miya and Kobayashi8

Recommendations in clinical management guidelines, such as those from the British Thyroid Association and American Thyroid Association, are largely based on expert panels and observational studies.Reference Perros, Boelaert, Colley, Evans, Evans and Gerrard Ba9,Reference Haugen, Alexander, Bible, Doherty, Mandel and Nikiforov10 Although most guidelines are periodically updated to reflect additional data, all guidelines will be inevitably outdated at the time of publication. The latest guidance from the British Thyroid Association and American Thyroid Association was published in 2014 and 2016 respectively. A number of risk stratification systems have also been developed over recent years to enable the tailoring of treatment and a subsequent follow-up strategy with more accurate prognostic prediction. Despite substantial similarities across guidelines, there are important differences for several common clinical scenarios encountered by physicians in clinical practice.

This review aimed to provide an overview, for the non-specialist, of currently recommended practices for the initial investigation and subsequent management of patients with thyroid nodules, and to highlight areas of variance between the systems in common clinical use.

Methods

The Dynamed, Medline, Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (‘CINAHL’), Cochrane Library and Trip databases were searched to identify clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and clinical practice guidelines, published from 2009, on the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules. The year 2009 was selected in order to provide a comprehensive update on the clinical review ‘Investigating the thyroid nodule’, published by Mehanna et al., in 2009.Reference Mehanna, Jain, Morton, Watkinson and Shaha11 The reference lists of selected articles were also reviewed. Case reports, conference abstracts, letters and commentaries were excluded.

Evaluation

Patient history and examination should focus on detecting features suggestive of malignancy. Thyroid cancer most typically presents as a painless asymptomatic nodule. A smooth generalised goitre is more suggestive of a hormonal or inflammatory aetiology. Whilst the recent rapid growth of a thyroid nodule may indicate aggressive cancer, subacute nodular thyroiditis (associated with systemic features) and haemorrhage into a nodule should be excluded.Reference Burman and Wartofsky12 Table 1 summarises clinical features concerning for thyroid cancer. Symptoms and signs of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism should also be evaluated.

Table 1. Clinical features suggestive of increased risk of malignancy in patients with a thyroid nodule

Initial investigations

Laboratory tests

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) should be measured in all patients with a thyroid nodule. The British Thyroid Association advises that all patients with abnormal thyroid function test results should be referred to an endocrinologist. The American Thyroid Association also recommends that patients with low TSH levels should undergo a radionuclide thyroid scan to assess the functional status of the nodule. Nodules associated with hyperthyroidism do not require a biopsy because they are benign.Reference Popoveniuc and Jonklaas13 Thyroid-stimulating hormone has been found to be an independent predictor of thyroid malignancy, with the risk of malignancy in a thyroid nodule increasing with serum TSH concentration, even within normal TSH ranges.Reference Boelaert, Horacek, Holder, Watkinson, Sheppard and Franklyn14,Reference Haymart, Repplinger, Leverson, Elson, Sippel and Jaume15

Measurement of TSH receptor antibody or thyroid peroxidase antibody is not indicated unless autoimmune thyroid disease is suspected. Routine serum calcitonin measurement is not recommended in the UK, except for patients with a family history of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 or suspicious investigations not consistent with papillary thyroid carcinoma.Reference Gharib, Papini, Garber, Duick, Harrell and Hegedus16 Serum thyroglobulin measurement is neither specific nor sensitive for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. It may be elevated in many benign thyroid diseases (e.g. multinodular goitre, thyroiditis) and its measurement should be reserved for post-treatment surveillance.

Ultrasound

High-resolution ultrasound is the most sensitive test in the evaluation of thyroid nodules, as well as in the assessment of associated cervical lymphadenopathy. Several ultrasound features have been described to identify nodules that may be malignant and to determine whether fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) should be performed. Hypo-echogenicity, microcalcifications, irregular margins, taller-than-wide shape and intranodular vascularity were found to be independent risk factors for malignancy.Reference Kim, Park, Chung, Oh, Kim and Lee17,Reference Remonti, Kramer, Leitão, Pinto and Gross18 No single ultrasound feature is diagnostic; however, the more suspicious characteristics of a nodule, the greater the likelihood of malignancy.Reference Brito, Gionfriddo, Al Nofal, Boehmer, Leppin and Reading19 The American Thyroid Association recommends that all patients with known or suspected thyroid nodules undergo ultrasound of the thyroid gland and neck, whereas the British Thyroid Association advocates its use predominantly to increase the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC.

Several international clinical guidelines have developed ultrasound-based risk stratification systems based on the above (Table 2).Reference Perros, Boelaert, Colley, Evans, Evans and Gerrard Ba9,Reference Haugen, Alexander, Bible, Doherty, Mandel and Nikiforov10,Reference Tessler, Middleton, Grant, Hoang, Berland and Teefey20,Reference Russ, Bonnema, Erdogan, Durante, Ngu and Leenhardt21 The British Thyroid Association classifies ultrasound features into five categories of increasing risk of malignancy, from ‘U1’ (normal thyroid gland) to ‘U5’ (very suspicious lesion). Fine needle aspiration cytology is recommended for nodules graded ‘U3’, and most centres use a size criterion of a minimum of 10 mm, based on subsequent work.Reference Perros, Boelaert, Colley, Evans, Evans and Gerrard Ba9 The American College of Radiology proposed a Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (‘TIRADS’) in 2017 using five ultrasound categories.Reference Tessler, Middleton, Grant, Hoang, Berland and Teefey20 Within each ultrasound category, size cut-offs are used to determine which lesions require fine needle aspiration (FNA), a follow-up ultrasound or no further action. The system was designed to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies performed on benign nodules. A recent meta-analysis of the five most commonly used ultrasound risk stratification systems found a higher performance of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in selecting malignant nodules for FNA.Reference Castellana, Castellana, Treglia, Giorgino, Giovanella and Russ22

Table 2. FNA: recommended indications for biopsy based on guidelines

FNA = fine needle aspiration; BTA = British Thyroid Association; ATA = American Thyroid Association; EU = European; TIRADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; ACR = American College of Radiology; FNAC = fine needle aspiration cytology

Artificial intelligence is a rapidly developing novel approach for evaluating thyroid nodules, which can reduce inter-observer variability. Some findings have suggested that machine learning algorithms may be more accurate than radiologists in diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules.Reference Zhang, Tian, Pei, Chen, He and Dong23

Several risk stratification systems are in active use worldwide, and many departments in a single unit may use more than one system, which may lead to inconsistent management recommendations and confusion for patients. The International Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Working Group has attempted to devise a universal international guideline to address this.Reference Tessler, Middleton, Grant, Hoang, Berland and Teefey20,Reference Buda, Wildman-Tobriner, Hoang, Thayer, Tessler and Middleton24 This Working Group has yet to finalise its report.

Role of other diagnostic modalities

Additional imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) scans, are not routinely indicated for routine thyroid nodule evaluation, but they may be helpful for the assessment of: extent of spread and involvement of cervical lymph nodes, tracheal invasion, retrosternal extension, airway compression, and surgical planning.Reference Perros, Boelaert, Colley, Evans, Evans and Gerrard Ba9,Reference Haugen, Alexander, Bible, Doherty, Mandel and Nikiforov10

Fine needle aspiration cytology

All guidelines support FNAC as the most sensitive and cost-effective procedure of choice for evaluating solid thyroid nodules. Ultrasound-guided FNAC is recommended to improve diagnostic yield given the lower rates of false negative and non-diagnostic cytology rates. This is of particular importance for nodules that are difficult to palpate, posteriorly located nodules and those with a predominantly cystic component.Reference Haugen, Alexander, Bible, Doherty, Mandel and Nikiforov10 Core needle biopsy should be considered in patients with inadequate FNAC findings, to prevent repeat FNAC or unnecessary surgery.Reference Na, Kim, Sung, Baek, Jung and Lee25 Open biopsies of the thyroid are rarely required,Reference Perros, Boelaert, Colley, Evans, Evans and Gerrard Ba9 and are generally reserved for cases requiring differentiation between lymphoma and anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Indications for FNAC are based on a risk stratification approach, including patient history, ultrasound characteristics and nodule size, although this varies between guidelines (Table 2). The British Thyroid Association guidelines differ from the other guidelines in that size is not used as a criterion for FNAC. Studies have demonstrated that size itself is not an accurate predictor of malignancy, as a nodule smaller than 1 cm can still show early lymph node metastases or extrathyroidal invasion.Reference Brito, Gionfriddo, Al Nofal, Boehmer, Leppin and Reading19,Reference Noguchi, Yamashita, Murakami, Nakayama, Toda and Kawamoto26

Any patient that has a cervical lymph node with suspicious appearances (e.g. microcalcification, cystic component, peripheral vascularity, hypo-echogenicity, round shape) should also undergo FNAC.Reference Leenhardt, Erdogan, Hegedus, Mandel, Paschke and Rago27

Management of incidental thyroid nodules

The increasingly widespread use of imaging has led to the increased detection of incidental thyroid nodules, the majority of which are benign. Incidentally detected nodules on CT may require further clinical evaluation. The American Thyroid Association advise that all such incidental nodules undergo ultrasound evaluation, whereas the British Thyroid Association advise ultrasound assessment only if there are any suspicious features on CT, for example extracapsular extension, tracheal invasion or associated cervical lymphadenopathy. In general, only nodules more than 1 cm in size require further evaluation, as they have a greater malignant potential.Reference Haugen, Alexander, Bible, Doherty, Mandel and Nikiforov10 Nodules with a benign appearance on ultrasound do not require any further action. Incidental nodules identified on positron emission tomography, however, should always be investigated with ultrasound, with biopsy of nodules sized more than 1 cm that are not obviously benign because of a higher incidence of malignancy of up to 46 per cent, unless the prognosis from a separate malignancy precludes further investigation.Reference Flukes, Lenzo, Moschilla and Sader28,Reference Yoon, Cho, Lee, Kim, Moon and Kwak29

Is interval growth a predictor of malignancy?

The natural history of benign thyroid nodules is variable; however, the majority of nodules remain relatively stable in size.Reference Alexander, Hurwitz, Heering, Benson, Frates and Doubilet30Reference Angell, Vyas, Medici, Wang, Barletta and Benson32 A prospective cohort study of 126 malignant nodules and 1363 benign nodules found that malignant nodules, particularly those with higher-risk phenotypes, grow faster than benign nodules. Thyroid nodules that do not change in size or become smaller are more likely to be benign, whereas a growth rate of more than 2 mm per year is associated with malignancy.Reference Angell, Vyas, Medici, Wang, Barletta and Benson32 It may therefore be reasonable for clinicians to have a lower threshold to undergo reassessment of cytology if significant growth is observed.

Management

Subsequent management following fine needle aspiration depends on the cytopathological diagnosis (Table 3). Up to 20 per cent of ultrasound-guided FNA results are non-diagnostic, requiring repeat FNAC.Reference Alexander, Heering, Benson, Frates, Doubilet and Cibas33,Reference Kim, Lee, Kim, Kim, Lee and Kim34 If FNAC is to be repeated, then an interval of at least three months is recommended to avoid sampling an area of regenerative changes that can lead to atypical changes being picked up on subsequent sampling. Malignant lesions, or those suspicious for cancer, warrant surgical excision in the form of either a hemithyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy.

Table 3. Comparison of thyroid nodule management following FNAC between BTA and ATA guidelines based on Bethesda classification

FNAC = fine needle aspiration cytology; BTA = British Thyroid Association; ATA = American Thyroid Association; US = ultrasound

Molecular markers

Up to 25 per cent of thyroid nodules have indeterminate or suspicious results on FNAC, with a variable risk of malignancy.Reference Cibas and Ali35 As FNAC is unable to provide a definitive diagnosis for these nodules, many patients will undergo diagnostic thyroidectomy. However, only a minority of patients may be found to have thyroid malignancy on final pathology. Molecular testing has therefore been advocated as a diagnostic modality to help identify nodules that are likely to be benign and do not require further intervention; such tests can be performed on even tiny amounts of cellular material harvested during FNA (e.g. 2.5–25 ng nucleic acid material).Reference Patel, Carty and Lee36 Current molecular testing uses a combination of genomic sequencing, messenger RNA analysis and/or microRNA expression of cancer-associated genes.Reference Patel, Carty and Lee36 The three molecular testing platforms commercially available are: Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier, ThyroSeq® v3 Genomic Classifier, and ThyGeNEXT® with ThyraMIR® (multiplatform approach).Reference Steward, Carty, Sippel, Yang, Sosa and Sipos37

Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier, previously Gene Expression Classifier, measures the expression of 167 genes, identifying thyroid nodules at low risk for malignancy so that unnecessary surgery may be avoided; it is therefore considered a ‘rule-out’ test. A recent pooled analysis of 11 studies comprising 1303 participants demonstrated a high negative predictive value of 92 per cent.Reference Al-Qurayshi, Deniwar, Thethi, Mallik, Srivastav and Murad38 The test had a lower positive predictive value of 60 per cent and therefore cannot be used alone to positively identify malignant lesions.Reference Endo, Nabhan, Porter, Roll, Shirley and Azaryan39 ThyroSeq v3 incorporates next-generational sequencing to detect a variety of genetic alterations or amplifications and abnormal gene expression in 112 genes associated with thyroid cancer. If a mutation in one of these genes is found, then thyroid cancer is almost always present; therefore, this test is considered a ‘rule-in’ test. A recent multi-institutional clinical validation study demonstrated a 97 per cent negative predictive value and 66 per cent positive predictive value.Reference Steward, Carty, Sippel, Yang, Sosa and Sipos37 Finally, ThyGeNEXT with ThyraMIR combines next-generation sequencing with the microRNA risk classifier test, with initial validation studies demonstrating a 97 per cent negative predictive value and 75 per cent positive predictive value (Table 4).Reference Lupo, Walts, Sistrunk, Giordano, Sadow and Massoll40

Table 4. Comparison of molecular marker negative and positive predictive values

NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value

Whilst the introduction of molecular testing is likely to result in a reduction in unnecessary surgery and patient anxiety, molecular testing is expensive, ranging between $4000 and $6000 (approximately £3150–£4720 GBP) depending on the specific test used.Reference Nicholson, Roberts, McCoy, Carty and Yip41 However, the majority of these analyses are based on simulation modelling rather than real-world patient data, and the results are dependent on a variety of factors including test performance parameters, cancer prevalence, costs of surgery and complications of surgery, and length of surveillance. The routine use of such tests is therefore likely to be prohibitive within the current framework of the National Health Service.

Implication of new histopathological diagnosis

The non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (‘NIFTP’) category was created to distinguish an indolent subset of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer – with a very low risk of adverse outcomes – from conventional forms of papillary thyroid cancer.Reference Nikiforov, Seethala, Tallini, Baloch, Basolo and Thompson42 It has a reported prevalence of approximately 61 per cent amongst follicular variants of papillary thyroid cancer.Reference Sahli, Umbricht, Schneider and Zeiger43 All existing molecular panels were originally developed and validated on the assumption that the non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features was considered malignant; therefore, the diagnostic validity of these tests is significantly reduced when the non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features designation is considered.Reference Sahli, Umbricht, Schneider and Zeiger43Reference Valderrabano, Khazai, Leon, Thompson, Ma and Chung45 These findings raise concerns regarding over-reliance on suspicious findings generated from molecular tests, potentially resulting in patients being subjected to unnecessary surgery.

Follow up of benign lesions

There is uncertainty regarding the optimal frequency and duration of follow up for benign thyroid lesions, and whether repeat fine needle aspiration is indicated. The British Thyroid Association does not recommend routine ultrasound follow up or repeat FNA unless there is a strong clinical suspicion of malignancy, or indeterminate or suspicious features on ultrasound. In contrast, the American Thyroid Association advises repeat ultrasound at 12–24 months for nodules with a low to intermediate suspicion on ultrasound, with repeat FNA if growth is detected (20 per cent increase in at least two nodule dimensions, with a minimal increase of 2 mm, or more than a 50 per cent change in volume). A study of over 2000 cytologically benign thyroid nodules, with a median follow up of 8.5 years, suggested that repeat assessment in asymptomatic, low-risk patients at 2–4 years’ time may be appropriate.Reference Nou, Kwong, Alexander, Cibas, Marqusee and Alexander46

Management of thyroid nodules in pregnancy

Management of patients with thyroid nodules identified in pregnancy requires careful evaluation of the risks to both the mother and fetus. All nodules should be investigated with ultrasound and FNA, to determine the risk of malignancy. Thyroid-stimulating hormone should be measured at regular intervals to optimise maternal thyroid function during pregnancy.Reference Alexander, Pearce, Brent, Brown, Chen and Dosiou47 Patients with potential or confirmed low-risk thyroid cancer do not require surgery whilst pregnant, except if nodules grow substantially by 24 weeks (50 per cent in volume and 20 per cent in diameter in two dimensions) or in the presence of metastatic cervical lymph nodes, as there is no adequate evidence to indicate that pregnancy worsens cancer prognosis.Reference Alexander, Pearce, Brent, Brown, Chen and Dosiou47Reference Herzon, Morris, Segal, Rauch and Parnell49 Pregnant patients who have surgery postponed until after delivery should have their TSH maintained at low to normal levels.Reference Perros, Boelaert, Colley, Evans, Evans and Gerrard Ba9,Reference Angell and Alexander50 Most experts recommend that, if a thyroidectomy is to be performed, it is conducted during the second trimester, when the risks of miscarriage and preterm labour are lowest.Reference Perros, Boelaert, Colley, Evans, Evans and Gerrard Ba9,Reference Sullivan51 Patients undergoing thyroidectomy should take levothyroxine therapy to achieve suppressed serum TSH concentrations. Subsequent radioiodine treatment, if indicated, should be delayed until after pregnancy and cessation of lactation.Reference Angell and Alexander50

Management of thyroid nodules in children

Thyroid nodules in children are uncommon, but often have an increased risk of malignancy compared with adults; therefore, the threshold for surgical intervention is lower.Reference Gupta, Ly, Castroneves, Frates, Benson and Feldman52 Ionising radiation exposure, iodine deficiency, previous thyroid disease and genetic predisposition are the most commonly identified risk factors associated with the development of thyroid nodules. Children with papillary thyroid cancer are also more likely to have extensive disease at clinical presentation, with lymph node involvement, extrathyroidal extension and pulmonary metastasis on clinical presentation.Reference Francis, Waguespack, Bauer, Angelos, Benvenga and Cerutti53 However, disease-specific survival rates, even in young children, are very high.Reference Hay, Gonzalez-Losada, Reinalda, Honetschlager, Richards and Thompson54 The evaluation and management of thyroid nodules in children should be the same as in adults, except that ultrasound characteristics and clinical context are used to identify nodules requiring FNAC, rather than size alone, and all FNACs in children should be performed under ultrasound guidance.Reference Francis, Waguespack, Bauer, Angelos, Benvenga and Cerutti53

Conclusion

There is currently significant variation in the management of thyroid nodules depending on which national guidelines are followed. Whilst ultrasound is now established as the primary investigation after clinical assessment for any thyroid mass, there are a variety of scoring systems in common clinical use and with differing protocols for deciding when to perform a biopsy. This can lead to variation in practice between different clinicians or hospitals within the same multidisciplinary team area. With increasing identification of thyroid nodules, the decision to biopsy, observe or discharge is becoming more difficult. In general, nodules less than 1 cm in size can be left alone, as can those that do not grow more than 2 mm in a 12-month period, and this has been taken into account in some of the scoring systems, such as the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System based on ultrasound scan findings.

Thyroid nodules diagnosed during pregnancy need careful consideration regarding the risks to both the mother and fetus when deciding management priorities.

Molecular assessment of thyroid nodules is an exciting and developing area of research; however, given its cost and the lack of real-world data, it is currently not in routine clinical use.

Competing interests

None declared.

Footnotes

Mr O Hilmi takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Mazzaferri, EL. Management of a solitary thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 1993;328:553–9Google ScholarPubMed
Guth, S, Theune, U, Aberle, J, Galach, A, Bamberger, CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. Eur J Clin Invest 2009;39:699706CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ezzat, S, Sarti, DA, Cain, DR, Braunstein, GD. Thyroid incidentalomas. Prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1838–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, JD, Chao, TC, Huang, BY, Chen, ST, Chang, HY, Hsueh, C. Thyroid cancer in the thyroid nodules evaluated by ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Thyroid 2005;15:708–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werk, EE Jr, Vernon, BM, Gonzalez, JJ, Ungaro, PC, McCoy, RC. Cancer in thyroid nodules. A community hospital survey. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:474–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabanillas, ME, McFadden, DG, Durante, C. Thyroid cancer. Lancet 2016;388:2783–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, Y, Uruno, T, Nakano, K, Takamura, Y, Miya, A, Kobayashi, K et al. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid 2003;13:381–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perros, P, Boelaert, K, Colley, S, Evans, C, Evans, RM, Gerrard Ba, G et al. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014;81(suppl 1):1122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haugen, BR, Alexander, EK, Bible, KC, Doherty, GM, Mandel, SJ, Nikiforov, YE et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehanna, HM, Jain, A, Morton, RP, Watkinson, J, Shaha, A. Investigating the thyroid nodule. BMJ 2009;338:b733CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burman, KD, Wartofsky, L. Clinical practice. Thyroid nodules. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2347–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popoveniuc, G, Jonklaas, J. Thyroid nodules. Med Clin North Am 2012;96:329–49CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boelaert, K, Horacek, J, Holder, RL, Watkinson, JC, Sheppard, MC, Franklyn, JA. Serum thyrotropin concentration as a novel predictor of malignancy in thyroid nodules investigated by fine-needle aspiration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:4295–301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haymart, MR, Repplinger, DJ, Leverson, GE, Elson, DF, Sippel, RS, Jaume, JC et al. Higher serum thyroid stimulating hormone level in thyroid nodule patients is associated with greater risks of differentiated thyroid cancer and advanced tumor stage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:809–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gharib, H, Papini, E, Garber, JR, Duick, DS, Harrell, RM, Hegedus, L et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules--2016 update. Endocr Pract 2016;22:622–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, EK, Park, CS, Chung, WY, Oh, KK, Kim, DI, Lee, JT et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:687–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remonti, LR, Kramer, CK, Leitão, CB, Pinto, LC, Gross, JL. Thyroid ultrasound features and risk of carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Thyroid 2015;25:538–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brito, JP, Gionfriddo, MR, Al Nofal, A, Boehmer, KR, Leppin, AL, Reading, C et al. The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:1253–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tessler, FN, Middleton, WD, Grant, EG, Hoang, JK, Berland, LL, Teefey, SA et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:587–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russ, G, Bonnema, SJ, Erdogan, MF, Durante, C, Ngu, R, Leenhardt, L. European Thyroid Association Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules in Adults: the EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J 2017;6:225–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castellana, M, Castellana, C, Treglia, G, Giorgino, F, Giovanella, L, Russ, G et al. Performance of five ultrasound risk stratification systems in selecting thyroid nodules for FNA. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020;105:dgz170CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, B, Tian, J, Pei, S, Chen, Y, He, X, Dong, Y et al. Machine learning-assisted system for thyroid nodule diagnosis. Thyroid 2019;29:858–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buda, M, Wildman-Tobriner, B, Hoang, JK, Thayer, D, Tessler, FN, Middleton, WD et al. Management of thyroid nodules seen on US images: deep learning may match performance of radiologists. Radiology 2019;292:695701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Na, DG, Kim, JH, Sung, JY, Baek, JH, Jung, KC, Lee, H et al. Core-needle biopsy is more useful than repeat fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules read as nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance by the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 2012;22:468–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noguchi, S, Yamashita, H, Murakami, N, Nakayama, I, Toda, M, Kawamoto, H. Small carcinomas of the thyroid. A long-term follow-up of 867 patients. Arch Surg 1996;131:187–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leenhardt, L, Erdogan, MF, Hegedus, L, Mandel, SJ, Paschke, R, Rago, T et al. 2013 European Thyroid Association guidelines for cervical ultrasound scan and ultrasound-guided techniques in the postoperative management of patients with thyroid cancer. Eur Thyroid J 2013;2:147–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flukes, S, Lenzo, N, Moschilla, G, Sader, C. Positron emission tomography-positive thyroid nodules: rate of malignancy and histological features. ANZ J Surg 2016;86:487–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, JH, Cho, A, Lee, HS, Kim, EK, Moon, HJ, Kwak, JY. Thyroid incidentalomas detected on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography: Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) in the diagnosis and management of patients. Surgery 2015;158:1314–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, EK, Hurwitz, S, Heering, JP, Benson, CB, Frates, MC, Doubilet, PM et al. Natural history of benign solid and cystic thyroid nodules. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:315–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durante, C, Costante, G, Lucisano, G, Bruno, R, Meringolo, D, Paciaroni, A et al. The natural history of benign thyroid nodules. JAMA 2015;313:926–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angell, TE, Vyas, CM, Medici, M, Wang, Z, Barletta, JA, Benson, CB et al. Differential growth rates of benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102:4642–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, EK, Heering, JP, Benson, CB, Frates, MC, Doubilet, PM, Cibas, ES et al. Assessment of nondiagnostic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirations of thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:4924–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, DW, Lee, EJ, Kim, SH, Kim, TH, Lee, SH, Kim, DH et al. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: comparison in efficacy according to nodule size. Thyroid 2009;19:2731CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cibas, ES, Ali, SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 2017;27:1341–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, SG, Carty, SE, Lee, AJ. Molecular testing for thyroid nodules including its interpretation and use in clinical practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:8884–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steward, DL, Carty, SE, Sippel, RS, Yang, SP, Sosa, JA, Sipos, JA et al. Performance of a multigene genomic classifier in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: a prospective blinded multicenter study. JAMA Oncol 2019;5:204–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Qurayshi, Z, Deniwar, A, Thethi, T, Mallik, T, Srivastav, S, Murad, F et al. Association of malignancy prevalence with test properties and performance of the gene expression classifier in indeterminate thyroid nodules. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;143:403–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endo, M, Nabhan, F, Porter, K, Roll, K, Shirley, LA, Azaryan, I et al. Afirma gene sequencing classifier compared with gene expression classifier in indeterminate thyroid nodules. Thyroid 2019;29:1115–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupo, MA, Walts, AE, Sistrunk, JW, Giordano, TJ, Sadow, PM, Massoll, N et al. Multiplatform molecular test performance in indeterminate thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol 2020;48:1254–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, KJ, Roberts, MS, McCoy, KL, Carty, SE, Yip, L. Molecular testing versus diagnostic lobectomy in Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Thyroid 2019;29:1237–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikiforov, YE, Seethala, RR, Tallini, G, Baloch, ZW, Basolo, F, Thompson, LD et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA Oncol 2016;2:1023–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahli, ZT, Umbricht, CB, Schneider, EB, Zeiger, MA. Thyroid nodule diagnostic markers in the face of the new NIFTP category: time for a reset? Thyroid 2017;27:1393–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hang, JF, Westra, WH, Cooper, DS, Ali, SZ. The impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the performance of the Afirma gene expression classifier. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:683–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valderrabano, P, Khazai, L, Leon, ME, Thompson, ZJ, Ma, Z, Chung, CH et al. Evaluation of ThyroSeq v2 performance in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017;24:127–36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nou, E, Kwong, N, Alexander, LK, Cibas, ES, Marqusee, E, Alexander, EK. Determination of the optimal time interval for repeat evaluation after a benign thyroid nodule aspiration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:510–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, EK, Pearce, EN, Brent, GA, Brown, RS, Chen, H, Dosiou, C et al. 2017 Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Disease During Pregnancy and the Postpartum. Thyroid 2017;27:315–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moosa, M, Mazzaferri, EL. Outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer diagnosed in pregnant women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:2862–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herzon, FS, Morris, DM, Segal, MN, Rauch, G, Parnell, T. Coexistent thyroid cancer and pregnancy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:1191–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angell, TE, Alexander, EK. Thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer in the pregnant woman. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2019;48:557–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, SA. Thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2019;62:365–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, A, Ly, S, Castroneves, LA, Frates, MC, Benson, CB, Feldman, HA et al. A standardized assessment of thyroid nodules in children confirms higher cancer prevalence than in adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:3238–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, GL, Waguespack, SG, Bauer, AJ, Angelos, P, Benvenga, S, Cerutti, JM et al. Management guidelines for children with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2015;25:716–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, ID, Gonzalez-Losada, T, Reinalda, MS, Honetschlager, JA, Richards, ML, Thompson, GB. Long-term outcome in 215 children and adolescents with papillary thyroid cancer treated during 1940 through 2008. World J Surg 2010;34:1192–202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Clinical features suggestive of increased risk of malignancy in patients with a thyroid nodule

Figure 1

Table 2. FNA: recommended indications for biopsy based on guidelines

Figure 2

Table 3. Comparison of thyroid nodule management following FNAC between BTA and ATA guidelines based on Bethesda classification

Figure 3

Table 4. Comparison of molecular marker negative and positive predictive values