Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T01:21:40.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

M. Bolognesi, M. Brdar, & K. Despot (eds.) (2019). Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age. Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language. John Benjamins (Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8).

Review products

M. Bolognesi, M. Brdar, & K. Despot (eds.) (2019). Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age. Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language. John Benjamins (Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2023

Nina Julich-Warpakowski  and
Paula Pérez-Sobrino
Nina Julich-Warpakowski
Affiliation:
English Department, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
Paula Pérez-Sobrino
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages, University of La Rioja, Logroño, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 2023 , pp. 622 - 627
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnden, J. A. (1997). Consciousness and common-sense metaphors of mind. In O’Nuallain, S., McKevitt, P. & Aogain, E. Mac (Eds.), Two sciences of mind: Readings in cognitive science and consciousness (pp. 311–40). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolognesi, M., van den Heerik, R., & van den Berg, E. (2018). VisMet 1.0: An online corpus of visual metaphors. In Steen, G. J. (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 89–113). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cardillo, E. R., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Stimulus design is an obstacle course. 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behaviour Research Methods, 42(3), 651–64.10.3758/BRM.42.3.651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990–present. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Google Scholar
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Surprise as a conceptual category. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 270–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–51). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A. (1991). Master metaphor list, second draft copy. Cognitive Linguistics Group, University of California. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.63.8462&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Mason, Z. J. (2004). CorMet: A computational, corpus-based conventional metpahor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasanek, B. (2015). Metaphors of mind: An eighteenth-century dictionary. Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th. (Eds.). (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1988). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar