I wish to comment on the phrase in the editorial by Tyrer & Craddock that in DSM-5 ‘the changes are largely cosmetic’. Reference Tyrer and Craddock1 This is probably correct for most of DSM-5 but not for autism, where a new, narrow definition of autism is proposed. The broader autism phenotype is accepted by professionals in this area of study. A new study has shown that only 60% of patients meet criteria for DSM-IV autism when they are assessed using the criteria of DSM-5 autism. Reference Yang, Bai-Lin and Shen2 A second error in this area in relation to DSM-5 is that an aspect of autism has been split off into a new category called social communication disorder. ICD-11 has not made this error. These changes in DSM-5 in relation to autism are radical and will lead to patients losing their diagnosis and services.
Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Volkmar, Fred R.
and
McPartland, James C.
2014.
From Kanner to DSM-5: Autism as an Evolving Diagnostic Concept.
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
p.
193.
Jackson, Scott L. J.
and
Volkmar, Fred R.
2019.
Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders.
p.
1.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.