Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:38:48.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Better Protein Localization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2011

Stephen W. Carmichael*
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
Philip Oshel
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859

Extract

Localizing specific proteins within cells, tissues, and organisms has been a goal of microscopists for generations. In the early 1990s, a breakthrough was made when a molecule originally derived from a jellyfish was introduced as a probe for fluorescence microscopy. This molecule is green fluorescent protein (GFP), and it has become well known for its usefulness in localizing proteins at the level of the light microscope. It is also well known that electron microscopy (EM) offers far superior spatial resolution over light microscopy, but the application of probes to localize specific proteins has required antibodies conjugated with colloidal metals (such as gold). Delivery of antibodies into the cell commonly requires detergents to permeabilize the cell membrane, which compromises the ultrastructural detail. Another breakthrough was recently published on-line by Xiaokun Shu, Varda Lev-Ram, Thomas Deerinck, Yingchuan Qi, Ericka Ramko, Michael Davidson, Yishi Jin, Mark Ellisman, and Roger Tsien: they have developed a method similar to using GFP for light microscopy, but for specifically tagging proteins at the EM level.

Type
Carmichael's Concise Review
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2011

Localizing specific proteins within cells, tissues, and organisms has been a goal of microscopists for generations. In the early 1990s, a breakthrough was made when a molecule originally derived from a jellyfish was introduced as a probe for fluorescence microscopy. This molecule is green fluorescent protein (GFP), and it has become well known for its usefulness in localizing proteins at the level of the light microscope. It is also well known that electron microscopy (EM) offers far superior spatial resolution over light microscopy, but the application of probes to localize specific proteins has required antibodies conjugated with colloidal metals (such as gold). Delivery of antibodies into the cell commonly requires detergents to permeabilize the cell membrane, which compromises the ultrastructural detail. Another breakthrough was recently published on-line by Xiaokun Shu, Varda Lev-Ram, Thomas Deerinck, Yingchuan Qi, Ericka Ramko, Michael Davidson, Yishi Jin, Mark Ellisman, and Roger Tsien [Reference Shu, Lev-Ram, Deerinck, Qi, Ramko, Davidson, Jin, Ellisman and Tsien1]: they have developed a method similar to using GFP for light microscopy, but for specifically tagging proteins at the EM level.

The essential molecule for this technique is miniSOG (mini singlet oxygen generator); this is a small (106 amino acids), genetically encodable protein that does not need exogenous cofactors to fluoresce and generate 1O2 (singlet oxygen) when exposed to blue light. Shu et al. began with the concept that the domain (LOV, for light, oxygen, and voltage) of phototropin that binds flavin mononucleotide could be converted into a molecule that generates 1O2. This was accomplished by mutagenesis of the phototropin LOV domain in Arabidopsis thaliana. They then manipulated the resulting molecule by shuffling the DNA to produce miniSOG, which resulted in an increased fluorescent brightness. This miniSOG was then fused with the target protein, which allows for efficient labeling that can be visualized by fluorescent microscopy, in the same manner as GFP-target fusion proteins. However, the real advantage is that the illumination of miniSOG generates sufficient 1O2 to locally catalyze the polymerization of diaminobenzidine (DAB) into an osmiophilic reaction product that can be visualized by EM. Furthermore, this can be done on specimens fixed by conventional techniques that yield images of detailed ultrastructure.

Shu et al. demonstrated correct localization of well-understood proteins (α-actinin, histone 2B, part of cytochrome c, and connexin 43 [Figures 1A and 1B]) tagged with miniSOG in cultured cells. They also localized cytochrome c in a multicellular organism (C. elegans) (Figure 1C and 1D). Then they localized the cell-adhesion molecules SynCAM1 and SynCAM2. They then used the miniSOG with the relatively new technique of “serial block-face scanning electron microscopy” to reveal the three-dimensional distribution of the SynCAMs in prenatal mouse brains (Figure 1E). In short, they demonstrated that SynCAM1 and SynCAM2 are localized to pre- and post-synaptic membranes, respectively. This technique shows great promise for establishing the 3-D architecture of diverse molecules in neuronal synapses, which will indeed be a complex task! Further, if the DAB and OsO4 do not quench the fluorescence of miniSOG, the target protein could possibly be imaged using a cathodoluminescence detector in the EM, as well as by simultaneous EM imaging. This could provide more evidence that the electron-dense DAB product is truly co-located with the miniSOG molecule, and hence the target protein.

Figure 1: A and B show light microscopic and EM localization, respectively, of Cx43, and C and D show mitochondrial-targeted miniSOG. E shows EM localization of SynCAM2.

At the end of their abstract, Shu et al. concluded that “MiniSOG may do for EM what Green Fluorescent Protein did for fluorescence microscopy.” Considering the fact that the senior author, Dr. Tsien, shared the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2008 for his role in the discovery and development of GFP and other fluorescent tags, their statement is no idle boast [2].

References

[1]Shu, X, Lev-Ram, V, Deerinck, TJ, Qi, Y, Ramko, EB, Davidson, MW, Jin, Y, Ellisman, MH, and Tsien, RY, PLoS Biol 9(4), e1001041. DOI: 10:1371/journal.pbio.1001041Google Scholar
[2]The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Xiaokun Shu for reviewing this article.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1: A and B show light microscopic and EM localization, respectively, of Cx43, and C and D show mitochondrial-targeted miniSOG. E shows EM localization of SynCAM2.