Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T12:00:25.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of postoperative renal functions and its effect on body perfusion in patients with double aortic cannulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2022

Berra Zumrut Tan Recep*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Istanbul Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, istanbul, 34325, Turkey
Aybala Tongut
Affiliation:
Children’s National, Washington, DC, USA
Ali Can Hatemi
Affiliation:
Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Eylem Tuncer
Affiliation:
Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Abdullah Arif Yilmaz
Affiliation:
Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Hakan Ceyran
Affiliation:
Kartal Kosuyolu Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: B. Z. Tan Recep, Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Istanbul Kartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Denizer St., Istanbul, Turkey. Tel: 0216505500. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The optimal visceral preservation method during aortic arch reconstruction is still controversial. It has been thought that double aortic cannulation is effective. Herein, it was aimed to evaluate this technique in providing distal perfusion.

Methods:

A total of 74 patients who underwent arch reconstruction between 2011 and 2019 were included. Patients were grouped according to ventricular physiology and cannulation strategies. Group 1 were univentricle patients, and all had double aortic cannulation. Group 2 were biventricular patients. Group 2A double aortic cannulation-done and Group 2B non-double aortic cannulation were included. Lactate, urea, creatinine values, renal functions, and need for peritoneal dialysis of patients were evaluated.

Results:

There were no complications observed due to descending aortic cannulation in any of the patients. A delayed sternal closure and the need for peritoneal dialysis were more common in the Group 1 (p < 0.01). The preoperative and postoperative 1st- and 2nd-day lactate, urea, and creatinine values in the Group 1 were higher (p < 0.05) when compared with the Group 2A and 2B. The same values were higher in Group 2A than the Group 2B (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

The positive effect of double aortic cannulation on renal dysfunction could not be demonstrated. This may be associated with a <1 month of age, low weight, complex surgical procedure, and high preoperative lactate, urea, and creatinine values in patients with double aortic cannulation.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Continuous perfusion of abdominal organs and the lower part of the body during arch reconstruction is not a new concept. Yasui et al Reference Yasui, Kado and Yonenaga1 defined a part of this technique in 1993 by suturing a tube graft to the descending aorta with left thoracotomy, and Imoto et al Reference Imoto, Kado and Shiokawa2 finalised the technique in 1999 by placing an additional arterial cannula in the descending aorta to ensure distal perfusion. Subsequently, the insertion of a second arterial cannula into the proximal descending aorta opened during arch reconstruction has been described, but not preferred due to the presence of a cannula in the surgical field. Reference Karavas, Deschner, Scott, Mettler and Bichell3 Another technique that is more preferred today is directly cannulating the descending aorta behind the pericardium or through the parietal pleura, which was defined by Hammel et al. Reference Hammel, Deptula, Karamlou, Wedemeyer, Abdullah and Duncan4

Some studies in recent years have suggested that end-organ damage, especially renal dysfunction, can be prevented with double aortic cannulation. Reference Kreuzer, Sames-Dolzer, Benedikt, Mair and Mair5 The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of this technique on renal function by comparing the perioperative and postoperative results of patients who underwent arch reconstruction.

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent arch reconstruction in our clinic, between 2011 and 2019, were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were grouped according to their ventricular physiology and cannulation strategies in this study. Group 1 consisted of univentricle and Group 2 of biventricular patients. Group 2A non-double aortic cannulation and Group 2B double aortic cannulation-done were included. The effect of double aortic cannulation on renal function was investigated by examining the preoperative/postoperative lactate, urea, and creatinine values of the patients. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes staging was used to standardise the renal insufficiency of the patients.

Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes staging

Surgical technique

Surgery was performed through standard median sternotomy in all patients. The innominate artery or distal part of the ascending aorta was directly cannulated in all of the patients. In patients who underwent double aortic cannulation, the beating heart was elevated to the right and outside of the pericardium using a malleable retractor during cardiopulmonary bypass. The descending aorta was reached by entering the left pleural cavity over the diaphragm and direct cannulation was applied. Both arterial lines were connected to the heart-lung pump separately.

Monitorisation

Arterial monitorisation was applied through the right radial artery and lower extremity. The efficiency of the perfusion was monitored by placing near-infrared spectroscopy monitorisation to both the cranial and renal region. When a significant difference was detected in the near-infrared spectroscopy value during cardiopulmonary bypass, the localisation of the innominate artery cannula within the arterial wall, the drainage of the superior caval vein venous cannula, the cardiopulmonary bypass flow, and the haematocrit value were investigated.

Statistical analysis

The Number Cruncher Statistical System 2007 (Kaysville, Utah, USA) programme was used for the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, first quartile, third quartile, frequency, percentage, minimum, maximum) were used while evaluating the study data. The conformity of the quantitative data to normal distribution was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test and graphical examinations. The independent group t-test was used for the comparison of the normally distributed quantitative variables between two groups, and the Mann–Whitney U-test was used for comparisons between two groups of non-normally distributed quantitative variables. Pearson’s correlation analysis and Spearman’s correlation analysis were used for the evaluation of relations between quantitative variables. Statistical significance was accepted as P < 0.05.

Results

The demographic characteristics of patients in the univentricular and biventricular groups were compared (Table 1). Double aortic cannulation was performed in 78.4% (n = 58) of patients. While double aortic cannulation was performed in all patients in the Group 1, this rate was 65.9% (n = 31) in the Group 2. Group 2A double aortic cannulation-done and Group 2B non-double aortic cannulation were included. The age and weight of the patients in group 1 were found to be significantly lower than those in Group 2A and 2B. (respectively p = 0.01, p = 0.013; p < 0.05 and p = 0.011, p = 0.08; p < 0.01). There was no difference between groups in terms of the X-clamp time, duration of mechanical ventilation, or duration of ICU stay (p = 0.075, p = 0.184, p > 0.05). On the other hand, a delayed sternal closure and the need for peritoneal dialysis were more common in the Group 1 (p = 0.01, p < 0.01).

Table 1. Demographic data

ACC: Aristotle’s comprehensive complexity; DAC: Double aortic cannulation; KDIGO: Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes.

a Kruskal Wallis Test.

b Mann–Whitney U-test.

c Chi-square test.

* p < 0.05.

** p < 0.01.

Preoperative and postoperative comparisons of the groups are summarised in Table 2. The preoperative and postoperative 6th- and 12th-hour, and 1st- and 2nd-day lactate values in the Group 1 were higher (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.003, p = 0.006, p < 0.05) when compared with the same values in the Group 2A and 2B. Moreover, the preoperative and postoperative 1st- and 2nd-day urea (p = 0.006, p = 0.009, p = 0.033, p = 0.020, p < 0.05) and creatinine (p = 0.01, p = 0.01, p = 0.01, p = 0.01, p < 0.05) values were also high in the Group 1.

Table 2. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative lactate, urea, and creatinine values by groups

CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass.

a Kruskal Wallis Test.

* p < 0.05.

** p < 0.01.

Patients in the Group 2 were evaluated separately according to cannulation strategies (Table 3). There was no significant difference in the preoperative, post-cardiopulmonary bypass, and 6-hour (p = 0.574, p = 0.782, p = 0.302, p > 0.05) lactate values of the patients who underwent double aortic cannulation, respectively. On the other hand, the postoperative 12th-hour, and 1st- and 2nd-day lactate values (p = 0.021, p = 0.037, p = 0.010, p < 0.05) were high. No difference was detected between the groups in terms of the urea values (p = 0.031, p = 0.076, p = 0.890, p = 0.308, p > 0.05). The preoperative and postoperative 1st- and 2nd-day creatinine values were significantly higher in the Group 2A (p = 0.036, p = 0.006, p = 0.003, p < 0.05).

Table 3. Comparison of perioperative values with double aortic cannulation in the biventricular group

CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass.

a Student t Test.

b Mann–Whitney U-test.

* p < 0.05.

** p < 0.01.

Discussion

Acute kidney injury is the most common major complication after cardiac surgery in children. Reference Gil-Ruiz Gil-Esparza, Alcaraz Romero and Romero Otero6Reference Park, Hur and Kim8 The incidence of acute kidney injury in this populations has been reported as 30–52%, and the greatest risk group is newborns. Reference Blinder, Goldstein and Lee9Reference Esch, Salvin, Thiagarajan, Del Nido and Rajagopal11 It has been reported that more than one-third of newborns develop acute kidney injury after CHD surgery. Reference Beken, Bulum-Akbulut and Albayrak12 It is impossible to determine the real incidence in neonatal group patients due to the immaturity of the renal tubules and changes in the glomerular filtration rate. Reference Welke, Dearani, Ghanayem, Beland, Shen and Ebels13,Reference Zappitelli, Parikh, Akcan-Arikan, Washburn, fett Mof- and Goldstein14 SooHoo et al Reference SooHoo, Patel, Jaggers, Fraubel and Gist15 suggested that the Norwood procedure is related to an increased incidence of acute kidney injury. In their study, it was also shown that the risk of acute kidney injury increased as the surgical complexity increased.

The exact mechanism of acute kidney injury that develops after cardiac surgery is not fully understood due to the complexity of its pathophysiology and its multifactorial nature. Reference Cavalcante, Cavalcante and Castello Branco16 Early diagnostic tools, such as urine and serum biomarkers, could not be determined and there is still no specific treatment for the prevention or cure of acute kidney injury. Although various criteria are used for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes staging has recently been used as a standard diagnostic tool. Reference Toda and Sugimoto17 Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Stage II and III are defined as severe acute kidney injury. The incidence of acute kidney injury, according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, after CHD surgery was reported as 29–86%. Reference Lex, Toth and Cserep7,Reference Park, Hur and Kim8,Reference Hazle, Gajarski and Aiyagari19

Acute kidney injury was also found to be associated with chronic renal failure, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and ICU stay, in addition to mortality. Reference Chiravuri, Riegger and Christensen20 Risk factors related to acute kidney injury include prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass duration, the complexity of surgical repair, degree of hypothermia, circulatory arrest, and postoperative low cardiac output syndromes. Reference Li, Krawczeski and Zappitelli10,Reference Esch, Salvin, Thiagarajan, Del Nido and Rajagopal11,Reference Chiravuri, Riegger and Christensen20

In another study, an age <1 was determined as a risk factor and in another study, a cardiopulmonary bypass duration >90 minutes was accepted as a risk factor. Reference Chan, Ip, Chiu and Cheung21Reference Boldt, Brenner, Lehmann, Sutter, Kumle and Isgro25 While being under the age of 1 is considered to be the most important risk factor, preoperative mechanical ventilation and perioperative peritoneal dialysis have been shown as other risk factors. Reference Li, Niu, Huang, Sheng and Tian26Reference Grams, Sang and Coresh29 A non-pulsatile flow, renal hypoperfusion, and hypothermia are also other causes of renal dysfunction. Reference Kron, Joob and Van Meter30,Reference Regragui, Izzat, Birdi, Lapsley, Bryan and Angelini31

Aortic arch reconstruction is the cornerstone of congenital heart surgery and can be an important part of complex surgical procedures, such as the Norwood procedure. Reference Karavas, Deschner, Scott, Mettler and Bichell3 The extent of body and distal organ damage during surgery is unclear. Systemic inflammatory response, as a result of ischaemia/reperfusion injury, may cause renal, hepatic, and intestinal dysfunction, which is associated with postoperative morbidity. Reference Kornilov, Sinelkinov and Soinov32 Moreover, patients who have undergone aortic arch construction are at high risk in terms of postoperative acute kidney injury because of systemic outflow obstruction. Reference Cooper, Charpie and Flores33,Reference Rajagopal, Emani, Roy, Westgate and Bacha34 Cannulation of the descending aorta, in addition to continuous low-flow body perfusion, was defined as an effective method for visceral protection. Reference Imoto, Kado and Shiokawa2 Only a few studies have had promising results in the last ten years with regard to the efficiency of double aortic cannulation. Reference SooHoo, Patel, Jaggers, Fraubel and Gist15,Reference Cesnjevar, Purbojo, Muench, Juengert and Rueffer35 Specifically, the Norwood procedure has been related to ensuring perfusion throughout the body with double aortic cannulation during surgery, avoiding deep hypothermia, reducing the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardium, and better postoperative hemodynamic results. It has also been found to be beneficial for postoperative kidney dysfunction and capillary leak. Reference Hammel36

Rajagopal et al Reference Rajagopal, Emani, Roy, Westgate and Bacha34 suggested a lower incidence of acute kidney injury during aortic arch repair in neonates when compared to their control group. In neonates who had aortic arch reconstruction, those who had only regional cerebral perfusion and those who had multisite perfusion were compared. Visceral perfusion was performed through the femoral or umbilical artery. In this study, while the incidence of acute kidney injury was 8% in patients who underwent multisite perfusion, it was found to be 50% in patients who underwent regional cerebral perfusion. Although this is a good outcome, the number of patients in the study was low. In the study of Hammel et al, Reference Hammel, Deptula, Karamlou, Wedemeyer, Abdullah and Duncan4 in 2013, it was reported that multisite arterial perfusion reduced the incidence of acute kidney injury and postoperative volume overload in neonates. In 2019, Kulyabin et al Reference Kulyabin, Gorbatykh, Soynov, Nickay, Zubritskiy and Bogachev-Prokophiev37 reported this technique was preferred to provide distal perfusion in the presence of ductus-dependent systemic circulation, especially in children with renal anomaly or dysfunction. In our study, there was no surgical complication due to descending cannulation. As a result, it is accepted as a reliable technique when applied by experienced people in accordance with the literature.

In our clinic, the standpoint of performing double aortic cannulation is dominant in patients in whom complex surgery is selected and the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass will be long. In this study, the Norwood Stage 1 procedure was applied to all of the patients in the univentricular group who had a diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. On the other hand, patients in the biventricular group were operated on due to hypoplastic arch. Double aortic cannulation was not applied to those in Group 2B, since they did not have any intracardiac anomaly and were older than 1 year.

The number of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stage ≥1 patients who had delayed sternal closure was higher in the univentricular group. This was considered to be related with a patient age <1 month, the presence of complex surgery, and the patient profile.

Hyperlactatemia is accepted as a sensitive marker. Reference Munoz, Laussen, Palacio, Zienko, Piercey and Wessel38 Although not specific, an increase or change in the lactate level during cardiopulmonary bypass might be a marker of regional hypoperfusion or increased metabolic demand. Reference Jonas, Jonas and Elliott39,Reference Sicsic, Duranteau and Corbineau40 Although high lactate levels in the postoperative period are related with low cardiac output, Reference Boigner, Brannath and Hermon41 organs most likely to produce lactate in response to hypoperfusion or reduced oxygen extraction include the brain, gut, liver, kidneys, and skeletal muscle. Reference Jonas, Jonas and Elliott39,Reference Sicsic, Duranteau and Corbineau40

Munoz et al Reference Munoz, Laussen, Palacio, Zienko, Piercey and Wessel38 reported that an increase in the lactate level during cardiopulmonary bypass can be an early indicator for determining postoperative results and is related to surgical complexity. Although it was suggested to determine the predictive level of lactate using serial measurements, Reference Boigner, Brannath and Hermon41 Hatherill et al found that the presence of a lactate level >6 mg/dL in the postoperative initial blood gas measurement of patients was suggested to be a risk factor Reference Hatherill, Sajjanhar and Tibby42 Similarly, Shemie Reference Shemie43 and Duke et al Reference Duke, Butt, South and Karl44 determined that the level of lactate was an indicator of a complicated postoperative period.

The most commonly used parameter in the diagnosis of renal dysfunction is the serum creatinine level. However, it is a late indicator since it is thought that more than 50% of kidney function is lost when it starts to rise. Reference Devarajan45,Reference Parikh and Devarajan46 In addition, the serum creatinine level is a non-specific parameter, as it is related to age, gender, muscle mass, muscle metabolism, and hydration status. Reference Murray, Devarajan and Levey47 However, it was shown to be correlated with renal dysfunction. Reference Kist-van Holthe tot Echten, Goedvolk and Doornaar48 In newborns, preoperative residual maternal creatinine can be present. This creatinine decreases with the effect of cardiopulmonary bypass and may lead to the underestimation of postoperative renal dysfunction. In such cases, it has been suggested that the aprotinin level can be measured to demonstrate independent renal damage. Reference Wilder, Kavarana, Voepel-Lewis, Paugh, Lee and Ohye49 An increase in the serum creatinine value, at a rate of 10–24%, was found to be related with mortality. Reference Coca, Peixoto, Garg and Krumholz50 Haase et al Reference Haase, Devarajan and Haase-Fielitz51 reported that there was no relationship between postoperative creatinine elevation and adverse effects in patients with an acute kidney injury diagnosis.

In the study of Kreuzer et al Reference Kreuzer, Sames-Dolzer, Benedikt, Mair and Mair5 in 2018, the effect of the perfusion strategy was evaluated in patients with double aortic cannulation in addition to an evaluation of the patients in terms of their postoperative lactate levels and the need for peritoneal dialysis. In their study, the 6-hour postoperative lactate values were higher in the univentricular group, and no difference was determined in terms of the cross-clamp duration, age, and body weight. As the kidney is the most fragile organ against hypoperfusion, it has been suggested that perioperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels may be significant. Low body weight, advanced age, and univentricular physiology were found to be associated with the postoperative creatinine level, while cross-clamping, the cardiopulmonary bypass duration, and advanced age were not.

In the current study, the urea, creatinine, and lactate values of the patients were measured serially. The postoperative lactate, urea, and creatinine values in the univentricular group patients were significantly higher than in the Group 2A and 2B. This result was associated with the high preoperative values of the patients (Table 2). It was aimed to separately evaluate the patients in the Group 2 according to their perfusion strategies, but no difference in the postoperative lactate values was present in the patients that underwent double aortic cannulation when compared to those who did not. Preoperative urea creatinine elevation was found to be associated with the postoperative results in this patient group (Table 3). Consistent with the literature, high preoperative lactate, urea, and creatinine levels were found to be risk factors for postoperative renal dysfunction.

Renal replacement therapy is required in 1–17% of patients who develop acute kidney injury after congenital heart surgery. Reference Jander, Tkaczyk and Pagowska-Klimek52 Peritoneal dialysis is still preferred for acute renal replacement treatment in newborn and early childhood patients with renal dysfunction because it is simple and reliable. Cannulation of the large vessels and systemic anticoagulation is not necessary, which helps to avoid the ischaemic and embolic complications of extracorporeal techniques. Reference Flynn53,Reference Stromberg, Fraser, Sorof, Drescher and Feltes54 Indications for peritoneal dialysis after cardiac surgery include hypervolemia, positive volume balance, oliguria, anuria lasting longer than 4 hours and not responding to medical treatment, and hyperkalemia. Reference Boigner, Brannath and Hermon41

As there is no standard definition for acute kidney injury, no consensus is present for the timing of first renal replacement. In 2007, Palevsky Reference Palevsky55 used blood urea nitrogen levels to determine the time of renal replacement. In their study, better results were obtained if renal replacement therapy was started when the BUN level was <73 mg/dL. It was suggested in the literature that paediatric fluid overload can be an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality instead of the BUN level. Reference Goldstein, Currier, Graf, Cosio, Brewer and Sachdeva56

Volume overload after heart surgery is frequent and multifactorial. Hazle et al Reference Hazle, Gajarski, Yu, Donohue and Blatt57 related volume overload with late sternal closure. Seguin et al Reference Seguin, Albright and Vertullo58 found it to be associated with long-term ventilation and high pressure requirement and infection in the early postoperative period. In another study, peritoneal dialysis was suggested in order to decrease pulmonary complications as the result of volume overload. Reference Werner, Wensley, Lirenman and LeBlanc59 On the other hand, Dittrich et al Reference Dittrich, Vogel, Dahnert, Haas, Alexi-Meskishvili and Lange60 suggested that starting early peritoneal dialysis decreases morbidity and mortality. For this reason, it is practised in many centres to insert the dialysis catheter in the operating room and start it on the 1st postoperative day. Because, especially in those with cardiopulmonary bypass time 150 minutes and more, early peritoneal dialysis positively affects the survival. Reference Namachivayam, Butt, Millar, Konstantinov, Nguyen and d’Udekem61

In our clinic, it is preferred to insert a peritoneal dialysis catheter on the operating table, because the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass is longer in patients with single ventricular physiology who are <1 month. In this group of patients, volume overload should be prevented before hemodynamic instability occurs. Peritoneal dialysis is also applied in patients with volume overload that do not respond to medical treatment and in the presence of oliguria and anuria, progressive urea, and increased creatinine values. The parameters of patients with postoperative peritoneal dialysis were also compared herein (Table 4). According to this, the elevation of the lactate, urea, and creatinine levels in the preoperative and postoperative periods is directly related to the need for peritoneal dialysis (p < 0.01).

Table 4. Evaluation of lactate, urea, and creatinine levels by peritoneal dialysis

CPB: Cardiopulmonary bypass.

a Student’s t-test.

b Mann–Whitney U-test.

* p < 0.05.

** p < 0.01.

Conclusion

Double aortic cannulation is a safe technique when applied by an experienced team. Especially in the risk group for renal dysfunction, neonatal, single ventricular physiology, and its application during complex surgery are recommended in literature. It can be preferred in critical patients where the perfusion of the lower half of the body cannot be achieved through PDA. Although no statistically significant difference was found in the patients who underwent double aortic cannulation in our study, the same opinion prevails.

Acknowledgement

No funding was obtained for this study.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

Yasui, H, Kado, H, Yonenaga, K, et al. Revised technique of cardi- opulmonary bypass in one-stage repair of interrupted aortic arch complex. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 55: 11661171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imoto, Y, Kado, H, Shiokawa, Y, et al. Descending aorta perfusion through median sternotomy in primary repair of aortic interruption complex. Jpn J Thorac Surg 1999; 52: 372375.Google ScholarPubMed
Karavas, AN, Deschner, BW, Scott, JW, Mettler, BA, Bichell, DP. Three-region perfusion strategy for aortic arch reconstruction in the Norwood. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 11381140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammel, JM, Deptula, JJ, Karamlou, T, Wedemeyer, E, Abdullah, I, Duncan, KF. Newborn aortic arch reconstruction with descending aortic cannulation improves postoperative renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 2013; 96: 17211726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreuzer, M, Sames-Dolzer, E, Benedikt, P, Mair, R, Mair, R. Double-arterial cannulation during arch reconstruction in pediatric patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2018; 27: 742748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil-Ruiz Gil-Esparza, MA, Alcaraz Romero, AJ, Romero Otero, A, et al. Prognostic relevance of early AKI according to pRIFLE criteria in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Pediatr Nephrol 2014; 29: 12651272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lex, DJ, Toth, R, Cserep, Z, et al. A comparison of the systems for the identification of postoperative acute kidney injury in pediatric cardiac patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 202210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, SK, Hur, M, Kim, E, et al. Risk factors for acute kidney injury after congenital cardiac surgery in infants and children: a retrospective observational study. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0166328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blinder, JJ, Goldstein, SL, Lee, VV, et al. Congenital heart surgery in infants: effects of acute kidney injury on outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 143: 368374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, S, Krawczeski, CD, Zappitelli, M, et al. Incidence,riskfactors,andoutcomesofacutekidney injury after pediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 14931499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esch, JJ, Salvin, JM, Thiagarajan, RR, Del Nido, PJ, Rajagopal, SK. Acute kidney injury after Fontan completion: risk factors and outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 150: 190197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beken, S, Bulum-Akbulut, B, Albayrak, E, et al. Evaluation of neonatal acute kidney injury after critical congenital heart disease surgery. Pediatr Nephrol 2021. DOI 10.1007/s00467-020-04890-z.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welke, KF, Dearani, JA, Ghanayem, NS, Beland, MJ, Shen, I, Ebels, T. Renal complications associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease: consensus definitions from the Multi-Societal Database Committee for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease. Cardiol Young 2008; 18: 222225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zappitelli, M, Parikh, CR, Akcan-Arikan, A, Washburn, KK, fett Mof-, BS, Goldstein, SL. Ascertainment and epidemiology of acute kidney injury varies with definition interpretation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 948954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SooHoo, MM, Patel, SS, Jaggers, J, Fraubel, S, Gist, KM. Acute kidney injury defined by fluid corrected creatinine in neonates after the Norwood procedure. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2018; 9: 513552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalcante, CTMB, Cavalcante, MB, Castello Branco, KMP, et al. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury in pediatric cardiac surgery. Pediatr Nephrol 2021. DOI 10.1007/s00467-021-05094-9.Google ScholarPubMed
Toda, Y, Sugimoto, K. AKI after pediatric cardiac surgery for congenital heart diseases-recent developments in diagnostic criteria and early diagnosis by biomarkers. J Intensive Care 2017; 5: 49, Cureus 12(4): e7727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, F, Khan, MK, Mirza, B, Qureshi, S, Abbas, Q. Acute kidney injury after congenital heart disease surgery: a single-center experience in a low- to middle-income country. Cureus 2020; 12: e7727.Google Scholar
Hazle, MA, Gajarski, RJ, Aiyagari, R, et al. Urinary biomarkers and renal near-infrared spectroscopy predict intensive care unit outcomes after cardiac surgery in infants younger than 6 months of age. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 146: 861867.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiravuri, SD, Riegger, LQ, Christensen, R, et al. Factors associated with acute kidney injury or failure in children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a case-controlled study. Pediatr Anaesth 2011; 21: 880886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, KL, Ip, P, Chiu, CS, Cheung, YF. Perito-neal dialysis after surgery for congenital heart disease in infants and young children. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 14431449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigden, SP, Barratt, TM, Dillon, MJ, De Leval, M, Stark, J. Acute renal failure complicating cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Arch Dis Child 1982; 57: 425430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zappitelli, M, Bernier, PL, Saczkowski, RS, et al. A small post-operative rise in serum creatinine predicts acute kidney injury in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 885892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sirvinskas, E, Andrejaitiene, J, Raliene, L, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass management and acute renal failure: risk factors and prognosis. Perfusion 2008; 23: 323327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boldt, J, Brenner, T, Lehmann, A, Sutter, SW, Kumle, B, Isgro, F. Is kidney function altered by the duration of cardiopul- monary bypass? Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 906912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D, Niu, Z, Huang, Q, Sheng, W, Tian, W. A meta-analysis of the incidence rate of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients with congenital heart disease. BMC Nephrol 2020, 21:350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amini, S, Abbaspour, H, Morovatdar, N, Robabi, HN, Soltani, G, Tashnizi, MA. Risk factors and outcome of acute kidney injury after congenital heart surgery: a prospective observational study. Ind J Crit Care Med 2017; 21: 847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, TN, Goldstein, SL. Congenital heart surgery and acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2017; 30: 105112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grams, ME, Sang, Y, Coresh, J, et al. Acute kidney injury after major surgery: a etrospective analysis of veterans health administration data. Am J Kidney 2016; 67: 872880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kron, IL, Joob, AW, Van Meter, C. Acute renal failure in the cardiovascular surgical patient. Ann Thorac Surg 1985; 39: 590598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regragui, IA, Izzat, MB, Birdi, I, Lapsley, M, Bryan, AJ, Angelini, GD. Cardio- pulmonary bypass perfusion temperature does not influence perioperative renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 160164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornilov, I, Sinelkinov, YS, Soinov, IA, et al. Outcomes after aortic arch reconstruction for infants: deep hypothermic circulatory arrest versus moderate hypothermia with selective antegrade cerebral perfusion. Eur J Cardio-THORAC 2015; 48: 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, DS, Charpie, JR, Flores, FX, et al. Acute kidney injury and critical cardiac disease. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2011; 2: 411423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rajagopal, SK, Emani, SM, Roy, N, Westgate, L, Bacha, EA. Acute kidney injury and regional abdominal perfusion during neonatal aortic arch reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 453458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cesnjevar, RA, Purbojo, A, Muench, F, Juengert, J, Rueffer, A. Goal- directed-perfusion in neonatal aortic arch surgery. Transl Pediatr 2016; 5: 134141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammel, JM. The Norwood operation with innominate artery and descending aortic cannulation, performed with continuous mildly hypothermic bypass. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 19: 292303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulyabin, Y, Gorbatykh, YN, Soynov, IA, Nickay, NR, Zubritskiy, AV, Bogachev-Prokophiev, AV. Double arterial cannulation in the critical management of neonatal aortic arch obstruction with closed ductus arteriosus. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2019; 10: 105108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz, R, Laussen, PC, Palacio, G, Zienko, L, Piercey, G, Wessel, DL. Changes in whole blood lactate levels during cardiopulmonary bypass for surgery for congenital cardiac disease: an early indicator of morbidity and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 155162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonas, RA. Flow reduction and cessation. In: Jonas, R, Elliott, M (eds). Cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates, infants and young children. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford, 1994: 6781.Google Scholar
Sicsic, JC, Duranteau, J, Corbineau, H, et al. Gastric mucosal oxygen delivery decreases during cardiopulmonary bypass despite constant systemic oxygen delivery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 455460.Google ScholarPubMed
Boigner, H, Brannath, W, Hermon, M, et al. Predictors of mortality at initiation of peritoneal dialysis in children after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 6165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatherill, M, Sajjanhar, T, Tibby, SM, et al. Serum lactate as a predictor of mortality after paediatric cardiac surgery. Arch Dis Child 1997; 77: 235238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shemie, SD. Serum lactate predicts postoperative complications after pediatric cardiac surgery. Pediatr Res 1996; 39: 54A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, T, Butt, W, South, M, Karl, TR. Early markers of major adverse events in children after cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 114: 10421052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devarajan, P. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin an emerging troponin for kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 37373743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parikh, CR, Devarajan, P. New biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: S159S165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, PT, Devarajan, P, Levey, AS, et al. A framework and key research questions in AKI diagnosis and staging in different environments. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3: 864868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kist-van Holthe tot Echten, JE, Goedvolk, CA, Doornaar, MBME, et al. Acute renal insufficiency and renal replacement therapy after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Pediatr Cardiol 2001; 22: 321326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilder, NS, Kavarana, MN, Voepel-Lewis, T, Paugh, T, Lee, T, Ohye, RG. Efficacy and safety of aprotinin in neonatal congenital heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 92: 958963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coca, SG, Peixoto, AJ, Garg, AX, Krumholz, HM. Parikh CR.The prognostic importance of a small acute decrement in kidney function in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2007; 50: 712720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haase, M, Devarajan, P, Haase-Fielitz, A, et al. The outcome of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-positive subclinical acute kidney injury: a multicenter pooled analysis of prospective studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 17521761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jander, A, Tkaczyk, M, Pagowska-Klimek, I, et al. Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration in children after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31: 10221028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flynn, JT. Choice of dialysis modality for management of pediatric acute renal failure. Pediatr Nephrol 2002; 17: 6169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stromberg, D, Fraser, CD Jr, Sorof, JM, Drescher, K, Feltes, TF. Peritoneal dialysis. An adjunct to pediatric postcardiotomy fluid management. Tex Heart Inst J 1997; 24: 269277.Google ScholarPubMed
Palevsky, PM. Clinical review: timing and dose of continuous renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2007; 11: 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, SL, Currier, H, Graf, C, Cosio, CC, Brewer, ED, Sachdeva, R. Outcome in children receiving continuous venove- nous hemofiltration. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 13091312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazle, MA, Gajarski, RJ, Yu, S, Donohue, J, Blatt, NB. Fluid overload in infants following congenital heart surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013; 14: 4449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seguin, J, Albright, B, Vertullo, L, et al. Extent, risk factors, and outcome of fluid overload after pediatric heart surgery. Crit Care Med 2014; 42: 25912599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, HA, Wensley, DF, Lirenman, DS, LeBlanc, JG. Peritoneal dialysis in children after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997; 113: 6467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dittrich, S, Vogel, M, Dahnert, I, Haas, NA, Alexi-Meskishvili, V, Lange, PE. Acute hemodynamic effects of post pericardiot- omy peritoneal dialysis in neonates and infants. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 101104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namachivayam, SP, Butt, W, Millar, J, Konstantinov, IE, Nguyen, C, d’Udekem, Y. Early peritoneal dialysis and major adverse events after pediatric cardiac surgery: a propensity score analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2019; 20: 158165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic data

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative lactate, urea, and creatinine values by groups

Figure 2

Table 3. Comparison of perioperative values with double aortic cannulation in the biventricular group

Figure 3

Table 4. Evaluation of lactate, urea, and creatinine levels by peritoneal dialysis