Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:04:17.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the nucleus of the solitary tract modulates body composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2022

M. Arcon
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
P.B. Martinez de Morentin
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
A. Leeson-Payne
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Y. Martynova
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
L. Heisler
Affiliation:
The Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2022

Ageing is commonly accompanied by loss muscle mass a concomitant increase in adiposity, which increases the risk of obesity. The nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) is a brain region located in the medulla oblongata of the brainstem and has been recognized as an important modulator of homeostasis, including energy homeostasis(Reference Clark, Hasser and Kunze1). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf) is a key regulator of energy balance. Both people and mice that do not produce Bdnf or a key receptor that it signals through are hyperphagic and obese. However, where Bdnf is produced to influence appetite and body weight has not been fully defined. One of the regions where Bdnf is expressed is the NTS(Reference Lee and Jun2) and there we examine its function within this brain region.

In this study, Bdnf was knocked down only within the NTS in middle aged male and female mice by injecting AAV expressing the Cre recombinase (AAV-Cre) or AAV expressing mCherry protein (AAV- mCherry) into the NTS of a Bdnf flox'd mouse line via stereotaxic surgery. Viral vectors were delivered into the NTS of middle aged Bdnf floxed mice. Control group (n = 7) received control AAV-mCherry (WT levels of Bdnf) whereas experimental group (n = 9) received AAV-Cre-mCherry to selectively knockdown Bdnf only in the NTS. Eight weeks later, energy intake and physical activity were assessed through metabolic cages (TSE Phenomaster), whereas body composition was assessed via Echo MRI. All data in brackets are presented as mean values of Control vs. Bdnf knockdown respectively.

Knockdown of Bdnf only in the NTS significantly increased lean mass (29.54 g vs. 26.38g; p = 0.0040; 95% CI = 1.201 to 5.124) and energy intake (4.36 g vs. 5.39g; p < 0.0001; 95% CI = 0.6625 to 1.409).

This change in body composition occurred despite lower levels of physical activity (11961 counts vs. 20093 counts; p = 0.0003; 95% CI = 3940 to 12324) in Bndf NTS knockdown mice. Knockdown of Bdnf in the NTS significantly also resulted in improved glucose handling and clearance at 15mins (29.42mmol/l vs. 22.18mmol/l; p = 0.0178; 95% CI = 13 to 1.474), 90 mins (13.70mmol/l vs.

11.03mmol/l; p = 0.0431; 95% CI = 13.70 to 11.03) and 120 min post glucose treatment (p = 0.0165; 95% CI = 4.086 to 0.4915). Similarly, Bndf NTS knockdown mice were more insulin sensitive, as indicated with an insulin tolerance test at 30 mins (8.840mmol/l vs. 6.614mmol/l; p = 0.0432; 95% CI = 4.370 to 0.08191), 45 mins (6.620mmol/l vs. 5.700mmol/l; p = 0.0063; 95% CI = 4.815 to 1.025), 60 mins (8.740 mmol/l vs. 5.714mmol/l; P = 0.0173; 95% CI = 5.395 to 0..6564) and 90 minutes (9.683 mmol/l vs. 6.633mmol/l; p = 0.0067; 95% CI = 5.097 to 1.003).

In summary, Bdnf NTS knockdown mice showed an increase in lean mass without altering physical activity. Illustrating the metabolic benefit of this change in body composition, glucose- and insulin- tolerance tests showed an improved blood glucose handling and disposal and insulin sensitivity in Bdnf NTS knockdown mice.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge funding from the BBSRC (BBN017838/1).

References

Clark, C, Hasser, E, Kunze, D, et al. (2011) J Neurosci, 31(34), pp.1231812329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J & Jun, H (2019) Front Physio, 10.Google Scholar