Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:35:30.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Authors' reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

S. Reed
Affiliation:
Maudsley Centre for Behavioural Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and Institute of Psychiatry London. E-mail: [email protected]
D. Murphy
Affiliation:
Maudsley Centre for Behavioural Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and Institute of Psychiatry London. E-mail: [email protected]
K. Xenitidis
Affiliation:
Maudsley Centre for Behavioural Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and Institute of Psychiatry London. E-mail: [email protected]
A. Russell
Affiliation:
Maudsley Centre for Behavioural Disorders, South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and Institute of Psychiatry London. E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

We would like to point out that we do not maintain that those in the offender group are less violent than their non-offender counterparts. Rather, we conclude that, as stated in the Results section, people in the offender group were significantly more likely to display some types of challenging behaviour but significantly less likely to display others. The results showing a reduction in the frequency of challenging behaviour during admission measured the change in rate of challenging behaviour per person per week by comparing a 4-week baseline period with the last 4 weeks of admission. Thus, these figures do not show the level of challenging behaviour exhibited in each group throughout their stay. The fact that there was no significant between-group difference in the rate of total incidents of challenging behaviour per month is shown correctly in Table 2. We thank Dr Marshall for giving us the opportunity to clarify this point.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.