Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:36:02.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Steven Loza (editor). Musical Aesthetics and Multiculturalism in Los Angeles. Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology, Vol. 10, Los Angeles: Department of Ethnomusicology and Systematic Musicology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1994. ii, iv, 235 pp., musical examples, illustrations, bibliographies, discographies. Available from the publisher, 2554 Schoenberg Hall, Box 951657, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1657.

Review products

Steven Loza (editor). Musical Aesthetics and Multiculturalism in Los Angeles. Selected Reports in Ethnomusicology, Vol. 10, Los Angeles: Department of Ethnomusicology and Systematic Musicology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1994. ii, iv, 235 pp., musical examples, illustrations, bibliographies, discographies. Available from the publisher, 2554 Schoenberg Hall, Box 951657, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1657.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Adelaida Reyes Schramm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Yearbook for Traditional Music , Volume 27 , 1995 , pp. 169 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the International Council for Traditional Music

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Loza has one other article and two co-authored ones in the volume. In the interest of saving space, the articles will be referred to as Loza 1, Loza 2, Haro and Loza, and Loza et al. once their topics have been introduced. Also in the interest of saving space, the longer titles are not cited in their entirety.Google Scholar

2. The quotation is highly reminiscent of Kant's definition of aesthetics in the Critique of Pure Reason: “the science which treats of the conditions of sensuous perceptions.” The OED cites this definition as obsolete.Google Scholar