Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T04:01:39.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shining a light on fossil fuel subsidies at the WTO: how NGOs can contribute to WTO notification and surveillance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2014

LIESBETH CASIER ,
ROBIN FRASER ,
MARK HALLE  and
ROBERT WOLFE
LIESBETH CASIER
Affiliation:
International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva
ROBIN FRASER
Affiliation:
School of Policy Studies, Queen's University
MARK HALLE
Affiliation:
International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva
ROBERT WOLFE*
Affiliation:
School of Policy Studies, Queen's University
*
*(Corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fossil fuel subsidies undermine efforts to mitigate climate change, and they damage the trading system. Multilateral discussion is hampered by inconsistent definitions and incomplete data, which could increase the risks of WTO disputes. Members do not notify such subsidies as much as they should under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM), which limits the usefulness of the SCM Committee. The reports of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism on individual countries and on the trading system draw on a wider range of sources, creating an opportunity for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to provide the missing data from publicly available sources. We suggest a new template that could be used for such third-party notifications. The objective is to shine a light on all fossil fuel subsidies that cause market distortions, especially trade distortions. The result should be better, more comparable data for the Secretariat, governments, and researchers, providing the basis for better-informed discussion of the incidence of fossil fuel subsidies and rationale for their use.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 603 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © Liesbeth Casier et al. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaton, C., Gerasimchuk, I., Laan, T., Lang, K., Vis-Dunbar, D., and Wooders, P. (2013), A Guidebook to Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform for Policy-Makers in Southeast Asia, Geneva: Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Bigdeli, S. Z. (2011), ‘Resurrecting the dead? The expired non-actionable subsidies and the lingering question of “green space”’, Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2): 2–37.Google Scholar
Bown, C. P. (2009), Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement, Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bown, C. P. (2011), ‘Developing countries and monitoring WTO commitments in response to the global economic crisis’, in Cottier, T. and Elsig, M. (eds.), Governing the World Trade Organization: Past, Present and Beyond Doha, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157–187.Google Scholar
Casier, L. and Moerenhout, T. (2013), ‘WTO Members, not the appellate body, need to clarify boundaries in renewable energy support (IISD Commentary July 2013)’, International Institute for Sustainable Development, http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2013/wto_members_renewable_energy_support.pdf.Google Scholar
Chaisse, J. and Matsushita, M. (2013), ‘Maintaining the WTO's supremacy in the international trade order: a proposal to refine and revise the role of the trade policy review mechanism’, Journal of International Economic Law, 16(1): 9–36.Google Scholar
Charles, C., Gerasimchuk, I., Bridle, R., Moerenhout, T., Asmelash, E., and Laan, T. (2013), Biofuels – At What Cost? A Review of Costs and Benefits of EU Biofuel Policies, Research Paper April 2013, Geneva: Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. (2010), ‘Addressing government failure through international financial law’, Journal of International Economic Law, 13(3): 743–761.Google Scholar
Clements, B. J., Coady, D., Fabrizio, S., Gupta, S., Alleyne, T. S. C., and Sdralevich, C. A. et al. (eds.) (2013), Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Collins-Williams, T. and Wolfe, R. (2010), ‘Transparency as a trade policy tool: the WTO's cloudy windows’, World Trade Review, 9(4): 551–581.Google Scholar
Cottier, T., Malumfashi, G., Matteotti-Berkutova, S., Nartova, O., De Sépibus, J., and Bigdeli, S. Z. (2011), ‘Energy in WTO law and policy’, in Cottier, T. and Delimatsis, P. (eds.), The Prospects of International Trade Regulation: From Fragmentation to Coherence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croome, J. (1998), Reshaping the World Trading System: A History of the Uruguay Round, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Doane, M. L. (1995), ‘Green light subsidies: technology policy in international trade’, Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce, 21: 155–180.Google Scholar
Froese, M. D. (2012), Between Surveillance and Transparency: Trade Policy Review and North American Dispute Settlement at the WTO, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2038036orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2038036.Google Scholar
G-20 (2009), G-20 Leaders’ Statement: G-20 Leaders Summit, Pittsburgh, 24–25 September 2009, http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2009/2009communique0925.html.Google Scholar
GATT (1987a), ‘Communication from the EEC’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/7, 11 June 1987.Google Scholar
GATT (1987b), ‘Meeting of 1-2 June 1897’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/2, 10 June 1987.Google Scholar
GATT (1988a), ‘Checklist of issues for negotiations’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/rev.3, 26 May 1988.Google Scholar
GATT (1988b), ‘Communication from Switzerland’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/17, 1 February 1988.Google Scholar
GATT (1988c), ‘Meeting of 1–3 February 1988’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/6, 15 February 1988.Google Scholar
GATT (1989a), ‘Communication from Canada’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/25, 28 June 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1989b), ‘Communication from Switzerland’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/26, 13 September 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1989c), ‘Elements of the framework for negotiations, Submission by the United States’, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W29, 22 November 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1989d), ‘Report of the meeting 26–27 September 1989’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/37, 16 October 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1989e), ‘Submission by Australia’, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/32, 30 November 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1989f), ‘Submission by India’, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/33, 30 November 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1989g), ‘Submission by Japan’, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/27, 6 October 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1989h), ‘Submission by the European Community’, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/W/31, 27 November 1989.Google Scholar
GATT (1990a), ‘Report of the Meeting 30 November–1 December 1989’, Note by the Secretariat, Negotiating Group on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, MTN.GNG/NG10/15, 10 January 1990.Google Scholar
Gerasimchuk, I. (2012), Fossil Fuels – At What Cost? Government Support for Upstream Oil and Gas Activities in Russia, February, Moscow/Geneva: WWF Russia–IISD.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. (2010), ‘Developing countries in the WTO Trade Policy Review Mechanism’, World Trade Review, 9(3): 419–455.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. (2011), ‘Strengthening WTO surveillance: making transparency work for developing countries’, in Deere-Birkbeck, C. (ed.), Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development: Perspectives and Priorities from Developing Countries, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 394–441.Google Scholar
Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) (2013a), ‘Fossil fuel – at what cost?’, Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva, http://www.iisd.org/gsi/fossil-fuel-subsidies/fossil-fuels-what-cost.Google Scholar
Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI) (2013b), Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, Library of official G-20 documents and related reports, Geneva, http://www.iisd.org/gsi/library-official-g-20-documents-and-related-reports-0.Google Scholar
Hoekman, B. (2011), Proposals for WTO Reform: A Synthesis and Assessment, January, World Bank and CEPR.Google Scholar
Horlick, G. N. (2013), ‘Solar energy wars – and peace’, Working Paper, Think Piece for the E15 Expert Group on Clean Energy, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Howse, R. (2010), Climate Mitigation Subsidies and the WTO Legal Framework: A Policy Analysis, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) (2013), A Citizens' Guide to Energy Subsidies in Malaysia, Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development, Global Subsidies Initiative, May 2013.Google Scholar
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (2011), Fostering Low Carbon Growth: The Case for a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement, ICTSD Global Platform on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainable Energy, Geneva.Google Scholar
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (2013), Clean Energy and the Trade System Group: Proposals and Analysis, Geneva.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2013), Fossil Fuel Subsidies – Methodology and Assumptions, http://www.iea.org/publications/worldenergyoutlook/resources/energysubsidies/methodologyforcalculatingsubsidies/Google Scholar
Jones, D. and Steenblik, R. (2010, June), Subsidy Estimation: A Survey of Current Practice, The Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Josling, T. and Mittenzwei, K. (2013), ‘Transparency and timeliness: the monitoring of agricultural policies in the WTO using OECD data’, World Trade Review, 12(3): 533–547.Google Scholar
Kahler, M. (2013), ‘Rising powers and global governance: negotiating change in a resilient status quo’, International Affairs, 89(3): 711–729.Google Scholar
Koplow, D. (2009), Measuring Energy Subsidies Using the Price-Gap Approach: What Does It Leave Out? International Institute for Sustainable Development, http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2009/bali_2_copenhagen_ff_subsidies_pricegap.pdf.Google Scholar
Koplow, D. (2012), ‘G-20 fossil fuel subsidy reform: flexible definitions make compliance easy’, 8 August, http://www.earthtrack.net/blog/g20-fossilfuel-subsidy-reform-flexible-definitions-make-compliance-easy.Google Scholar
Meyer, T. (2013), ‘Energy subsidies and the World Trade Organization’, ASIL Insights, 17(22).Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. B. (1998), ‘Sources of transparency: information systems in international regimes’, International Studies Quarterly, 42(1): 109–131.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., Buck, M., Müller, S., Pfahl, S., Tarasofsky, R. G., Werksman, J., and Palmer, A. (2002), ‘Participation of non-governmental organisations in international environmental governance: legal basis and practical experience’, Final Report June 2002, Ecologic Institute for International and European Environmental Policy.Google Scholar
Okaru, V. O. (2011), ‘The Basel Convention: controlling the movement of hazardous wastes to developing countries’, Fordham Environmental Law Review, 4(2): 137–165.Google Scholar
Oosterhuis, F., with contributions from Alexandru, Raluca, Blumberga, Andra, Bobinaite, Viktorija, Cauchi, Jonathan, Nikolova, Nataliya, and Papyrakis, Elissaios (2013), Budgetary Support and Tax Expenditures for Fossil Fuels: An Inventory for Six Non-OECD EU Countries, 15 January, IVM Institute for Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010), OECD's Producer Support Estimate and Related Indicators of Agricultural Support: Concepts, Calculations, Interpretation and Use (the PSE manual), Trade and Agricultural Directorate, OECD, http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/46193164.pdf.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2012), Inventory of Estimated Budgetary Support and Tax Expenditures for Fossil Fuels 2013, OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. (2013), Global Civil Society and Inter-Governmental Organizations: The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the World Trade Organization, New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.Google Scholar
Perez-Esteve, M. (2012), ‘WTO rules and practices for transparency and engagement with CSOs’, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2012-14, 18 September, World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Rubini, L. (2009), The Definition of Subsidy and State Aid: WTO and EC Law in Comparative Perspective, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubini, L. (2012), ‘Ain't wastin time no more: subsidies for renewable energy, the SCM Agreement, policy space, and law reform’, Journal of International Economic Law, 15(2): 525–579.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. (1998), ‘Previous multilateral efforts to discipline subsidies to natural resource based industries’, Paper prepared for the Workshop on the Impact of Government Financial Transfers on Fisheries Management, Resource Sustainability, and International Trade, Manila, Philippines, 17–19 August 1998.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. (2010), ‘Subsidies in the traditional energy sector’, in Pauwelyn, J. (ed.), Global Challenges at the Intersection of Trade, Energy and the Environment, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, pp. 183–192.Google Scholar
Steenblik, R. and Simón, J. (2011), A New Template for Notifying Subsidies to the WTO, May, The Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. P. (1993), The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History (1986–1992), Volume I: Commentary, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Thöne, M. and Dobroschke, S. (2008, April), WTO Subsidy Notifications: Assessing German Subsidies under the GSI Notification Template Proposed for the WTO, The Global Subsidies Initiative of the International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. (2012), ‘Protectionism and multilateral accountability during the great recession: drawing inferences from dogs not barking’, Journal of World Trade (4): 777–814.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. (2013), Letting the Sun Shine in at the WTO: How Transparency Brings the Trading System to Life, Staff Working Paper ERSD-2013-03, World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. and Baddeley, S. (2012), ‘Tropical timber, e-waste and diamonds: how transparency makes MEAs work’, ENTWINED Issue Brief 13, 24 August.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (1996), Guidelines for Arrangements on Relations with Non-Governmental Organizations: Decision Adopted by the General Council on 18 July 1996, WT/L/62, 23 July 1996.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (1999), ‘Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on 1–2 November 1999’, World Trade Organization, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, G/SCM/M/24, 26 April 2000.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2002a), Improved Rules under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, Proposal by Venezuela, Negotiating Group on Rules, TN/RL/W/41, World Trade Organization, 17 December 2002.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2002b), WTO Negotiations Concerning the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, Proposal by the European Communities, Negotiating Group on Rules, TN/RL/W/30, World Trade Organization, 21 November 2002.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2003a), Egyptian Paper Containing Questions and Comments on the Contributions Submitted in the Framework of the Doha Negotiations on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement, Negotiating Group on Rules, TN/RL/W/57, World Trade Organization, 10 February 2003.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2003b), Preliminary answers of Cuba and Venezuela to the questions provided by Egypt, Negotiating Group on Rules, TN/RL/W/108, World Trade Organization, 13 May 2003.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2003c), Preliminary Replies to the Questions by Australia, Submitted by Venezuela and Cuba, Negotiating Group on Rules, TN/RL/W/70, World Trade Organization, 18 March 2003.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2003d), Questionnaire Format for Subsidy Notifications under Article 25 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and under Article XVI of GATT 1994, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, G/SCM/6/Rev.1, World Trade Organization, 11 November 2003.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2006), World Trade Report 2006: Subsidies, Trade and the WTO, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2009), Strengthening the WTO, Communication from India, General Council, WT/GC/W/605, World Trade Organization, 3 July 2009.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2011a), ‘Overview of developments in the international trading environment: Annual report by the Director-General’, WT/TPR/OV/14, World Trade Organization, 21 November 2011.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2011b), ‘Trade policy review mechanism: decision of 17 December 2011’, WT/L/848, World Trade Organization, 19 December 2011.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2012a), Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation Sector; Canada – Measures Relating to the Feed-In Tariff Program, Report of the Panels, WT/DS412/R, WT/DS46, World Trade Organization, 19 December 2012.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2012b), ‘Notification requirements under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Background note by the Secretariat’, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, G/SCM/W/546/Rev.3, World Trade Organization, 12 April 2012.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2012c), ‘Overview of developments in the international trading environment: Annual Report by the Director-General’, WT/TPR/OV/15, World Trade Organization, 29 November 2012.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2012d), China – Countervailing and Anti-dumping Duties on Grain Oriented Flat- Rolled Electrical Steel from the United States (China–GOES), Report of the Panel, WT/DS414/R, World Trade Organization, 15 June 2012.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2013a), Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation Sector; Canada – Measures Relating to the Feed-In Tariff Program, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS412/AB/R, WTDS426/AB/R, World Trade Organization, 6 May 2013.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2013b), ‘Report to the TPRB from the Director-General on trade-related developments (mid-October 2012 to mid-May 2013)’, Trade Policy Review Body, WT/TPR/OV/W/7, World Trade Organization, 5 July 2013.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2013c), ‘Trade policy review’, Report by the Secretariat’, Indonesia, World Trade Organization, Trade Policy Review Body, WT/TPR/S/278, World Trade Organization, 6 March 2013.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2014), ‘Trade policy review’, Report by the Secretariat, Malaysia, Trade Policy Review Body, WT/TPR/S/292, World Trade Organization, 27 January 2014.Google Scholar
Zahrnt, V. (2009), The WTO's Trade Policy Review Mechanism: How to Create Political Will for Liberalization? ECIPE Working Paper No. 11/2009, European Centre for International Political Economy.Google Scholar