Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T23:18:39.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of Spelt in Chick and Poult Rations1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

G. H. Arscott
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry ScienceOregon State University Corvallis, Oregon
J. A. Harper
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry ScienceOregon State University Corvallis, Oregon
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arscott, G. H., Johnson, L. E. and Parker, J. E. 1955. The use of barley in high-efficiency broiler rations. 1. The influence of methionine, grit and stabilized animal fat on efficiency of utilization. Poultry Science 34: 655662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Arscott, G. H., McCluskey, W. H. and Parker, J. E. 1958: The use of barley in high-efficiency broiler rations. 2. Effect of stabilized animal fat and pelleting on efficiency of feed utilization and water consumption. Poultry Sci. 37: 117123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arscott, G. H. and Rose, R. J. 1960 Use of barley in high-efficiency broiler rations. 4. Influence of amylolytic enzymes on efficiency of utilization, water consumption and litter condition. Poultry Science 39: 9395..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, L. R., 1957. Water treatment of grain and enzyme additions to feeds for poultry studies at the Western Washington Experiment Station. 10th W.S.C. Animal Ind. Conf. for Feed Manufacturers and Feed Dealers, Nov. 15, pp. 1720.Google Scholar
Fry, R. E., Allred, J. B., Jensen, L. S. and McGinnis, J., 1957. Influence of the grain component of the diet on response of chicks and poults to dietary enzyme supplementation. Poultry Science 36: 1120.Google Scholar
Goodearl, G. P., 1945. Selection of feeds by growing turkeys. Bulletin 335 (Technical). North Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, pp. 119.Google Scholar
7Harper, J. A., 1959. Recent developments in turkey feeding experiments at Oregon State College. Feedstuffs 31: 2831, 34.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. H., Fry, R. E., Allred, J. B. and McGinnis, J., 1957. Improvement in the nutritional value of barley for chicks by enzyme supplementation. Poultry Science 36: 919921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. H. and Leighty, C. E. 1938 Emmer and spelt. U.S.D.A. Farmers' Bulletin No. 1429, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. B. 1956. Feeds and feeding. 22nd Edition, P.459. The Morrison Publishing Co., Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
National Research Council, 1959. Joint United States-Canadian tables of feed composition. Publication No. 659, pp. 2425.Google Scholar