Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:27:48.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Cartesian Historian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

William H. McNeill
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

3 Bodde, Derk, China's First Unifier, Leiden, 1938, pp. 12.Google Scholar

4 Some sociologists might object to this formulation, since they regard a built-in set of expectations as an essential part of any institution. Unless we know what to expect from other people, there can be no regularity and predictability in human behavior, they assert. Granting this point, I still think that people may change their ideas before they change the structure of their institutions, as well of course as afterward. Thus there were many changes in ideas and expectations before the collapse of the ancien réime in the French and Russian revolutions. Hence the two are separable, not only theoretically but also empirically.

5 Toynbee, Arnold J., A Study of History, abridgment by Somervell, D. C., New York, 1947, pp. 190, 336–49.Google Scholar

6 Sorokin, P. A., Social and Cultural Dynamics, New York, 1937, III, pp. 196208.Google Scholar See also pp. 185–96 for a more general analysis of political centralization.