Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:10:27.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weeds in Human Affairs in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Sustainable Food Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

I. Okezie Akobundu
I. Okezie Akobundu*
Affiliation:
Int. Inst. Trop. Agric., P.M.B. 5320, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has the world's largest human population growth rate, some of its poorest soils, and a high incidence of crop pests. Weeds are the major pest in virtually all of the agro-ecological zones of SSA. Parasitic and perennial weeds dominate the savanna vegetation zones whereas rapidly growing annual weeds overwhelm crops in the forest vegetation zones. High weed pressure coupled with inefficient weed control practices have tied up a disproportionate percentage of SSA's economically active population in the primary task of food production and also have kept crop yields down. In the absence of organized weed research and professional training in weed science to meet the needs of the region, improved cultivars of virtually all crops fall prey to weeds, and available arable land becomes limited to that area that can be kept free of weeds. A preponderance of annual weeds in humid parts of SSA together with hard-to-kill perennial grasses and parasitic weeds in the subhumid and arid agro-ecological zones hamper crop production and frustrate farmers throughout the region. Sustainable food production in the region can be achieved by introducing improved weed management technologies and by addressing other food production constraints of the region.

Keywords

Labor distributionlabor usesustainable agricultureweedingwomen in agricultureCrotalaria verrucosa
Type
Honorary Member Address
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 680 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akobundu, I. O. 1980. Economics of weed control in African Tropics and sub tropics. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds. 3:911–920.Google Scholar
2. Akobundu, I. O. 1984. Advances in live mulch crop production in the tropics. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci., 37:51–57.Google Scholar
3. Akobundu, I. O. 1987. Weed Science in the Tropics: Principles and Practices. Chichester. John Wiley and Sons. 522 p.Google Scholar
4. Appleby, A. P., and Sweet, R. D. 1983. Training weed science graduate students from developing countries. p. 155–168 in Williams, R. D., ed. Communication of Weed Science Technologies in Developing Countries. Proc. of symposium sponsored by the Int. Weed Sci. Soc. and the Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Feb. 10, 1983. St. Louis, MO, USA. IPPC Doc. no. 49-B-83. Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
5. Brundtland, G. H. 1987. Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 144 p.Google Scholar
6. Carter, H. O. 1988. The agricultural sustainability issue: an overview and research assessment. p. 115–136 in Javiers, E., and Renberg, U., eds. The Changing Dynamics of Global Agriculture. A seminar workshop on Research Policy Implications for National Agricultural Research Systems. DSE/ZEL Feldafing, Germany. Sept. 22–28, 1988.Google Scholar
7. Castillo, G. T. 1976. The farmer revisited: towards a return to the food problem. Proceedings. The World Food Conference of 1976. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA. The Iowa University Press, Ames. p. 33–53.Google Scholar
8. Ehui, S. K., and Spencer, D.S.C. 1991. Indices for Measuring the Sustainability and Economic Viability of Farming Systems. RCMP Res. Monograph. No. 3. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. 28 p.Google Scholar
9. Food and Agriculture Organization. 1988. Production Yearbook: FAO. United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
10. Geddes, A.M.W. 1990. The Relative Importance of Crop Pests in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Res. Institute Bull. No. 36, vi + 69 p.Google Scholar
11. Holm, L. 1969. Weed problems in developing countries. Weed Sci. 17: 113–118.Google Scholar
12. IITA. 1975. Annual Report. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria. 219 p.Google Scholar
13. Javiers, E., and Renberg, U., eds. 1988. The Changing Dynamics of Global Agriculture. A seminar workshop on Research Policy Implications for National Agricultural Research Systems. DSE/ZEL Feldafing, Germany. Sept. 22–28, 1988.Google Scholar
14. Koch, W., Beshir, M. E., and Unterladstatter, R. 1983. Crop losses due to weeds. p. 153–166 in Improving Weed Management. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 44. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
15. Mbilinyi, M. 1988. Agribusiness and women peasants in Tanzania. Development and Change 19:549–583.Google Scholar
16. Mbilinyi, M. 1990. “Structural Adjustment”, agribusiness and the rural women in Tanzania. p. 111–124 in Bernstein, B., Crow, B., Mackintosh, M., and Martin, C., eds. The Food Question: Profits versus People. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
17. Parker, C., and Fryer, J. D. 1975. Weed control problems causing major reductions in world food supplies. FAO Plant Protection Bull. 23: 83–93.Google Scholar
18. Sasson, A. 1990. Feeding Tomorrow's World. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris. 805 p.Google Scholar
19. Spencer, D.S.C., and Swift, M. J. 1990. Sustainable agriculture: definition and measurement. Paper presented at the 4th Conf. of the African Assoc. for Biological Nitrogen Fixation, IITA, Ibadan. Sept. 24–28, 1990.Google Scholar
20. Stroud, A. 1983. Management decisions by small farmers affecting weed populations: a prelude to on-farm research. p. 61–81 in Michieka, R. W. and Munera, L. eds. Proc. 9th East African Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. Google Scholar
21. TAC. 1987. Sustainable Agricultural Production: Implications for International Agricultural Research. Rome: TAC (Technical Advisory Committee)/CGIAR.Google Scholar
22. Tolson, E. N. 1983. The role of industry in technology transfer to developing countries. p. 149–154 in Williams, R. D., ed. Communication of Weed Science Technologies in Developing Countries. Proc. of a symposium sponsored by the Int. Weed Sci. Soc. and the Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Feb. 10, 1983. St. Louis, MO, USA. IPPC Doc. No. 49-B-83. Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
23. Williams, R. D., ed. 1983. Communication of Weed Science Technologies in Developing Countries. Proc. of a symposium sponsored by the Int. Weed Sci. Soc. and the Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Feb. 10, 1983. St. Louis, MO, USA. IPPC Doc. No. 49-B-83. Corvallis, OR. 214 p.Google Scholar