Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:32:52.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Florida Pastures With the Use of Aminocyclopyrachlor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Daniel G. Abe ,
Brent A. Sellers ,
Jason A. Ferrell ,
Ramon G. Leon  and
D. Calvin Odero
Daniel G. Abe
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL 33865
Brent A. Sellers*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL 33865
Jason A. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Ramon G. Leon
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida West Florida Research and Education Center, 4253 Experiment Drive, Jay, FL 32565
D. Calvin Odero
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida Everglades Research and Education Center, 3200 East Palm Beach Road, Belle Glade, FL 33430
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies under Florida conditions for susceptibility of pasture weed species to the new herbicide, aminocyclopyrachlor (ACP), are essential. Sensitivity of weed species was dependent upon the species and environment. Whitehead broom was not susceptible to ACP. Dogfennel control was consistently above 85% 1 yr after treatment with ACP at 140 g ha−1 and all ACP premixes. Milkpea was initially sensitive to all ACP treatments, but regrowth was evident in all treatments after 1 yr at one location. All ACP treatments resulted in 100% control of tropical soda apple 1 yr after treatment at one location, but less than 50% control at a second location. Herbicide applications with ACP, when labeled, will likely provide good to excellent control (80 to 100%) of several weed species.

Los estudios bajo condiciones de Florida sobre la susceptibilidad a aminocyclopyrachlor (ACP) de especies de malezas en pastos, son esenciales. La sensibilidad de especies de malezas dependió de la especie y del ambiente. Spermacoce verticillata no fue susceptible a ACP. El control de Eupatorium capillifolium estuvo consistentemente arriba de 85% 1 año después del tratamiento con ACP a 140 g ha−1 y con todas las premezclas con ACP. Galactia sp. fue inicialmente sensible a todos los tratamientos con ACP, pero rebrotes fueron evidentes en todos los tratamientos después de un año, en una localidad. Todos los tratamientos con ACP resultaron en 100% de control de Solanum viarum a un año después del tratamiento en una localidad, pero solamente en 50% de control en una segunda localidad. La aplicación de herbicidas con ACP, cuando esté registrado, probablemente propiciará un control de bueno a excelente (80 a 100%) de varias especies de malezas.

Keywords

Aminocyclopyrachlorchlorsulfuronmetsulfurontriclopyr-amine2,4-D aminedogfennel, Eupatorium capillifolium> (Lam.) Smallmilkpea, Galactia sp. P. Br.ragweed parthenium, Parthenium hysterophorus L.tropical soda apple, Solanum viarum Dunal.whitehead broom, Spermacoce verticillata L.Pasturepostemergencepremixweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 271 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Ian Burke, Washington State University.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2009) DuPont: DPX-MAT28 technical bulletin. Wilmington, DE: DuPont Crop Protection Google Scholar
Beeler, JE, Rhodes, GN, Bates, GE, Main, CL, Mueller, TC (2004) Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) control in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and clover (Trifolium sp.) pastures with mixtures of 2,4-D and picloram. Weed Technol 18:1091–1095 Google Scholar
Bukun, B, Lindenmayer, RB, Nissen, SJ, Westra, P, Shaner, DL, Brunk, G (2010) Absorption and translocation of aminocyclopyrachlor and aminocyclopyrachlor-methyl in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci 58:96–102 Google Scholar
Bunnell, BT, Baker, RD, McCarty, LB, Hall, DW, Colvin, DL. (2003) Differential response of five bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) cultivars to metsulfuron. Weed Technol 17:550–553 Google Scholar
Crawford, SC, Wiggins, LF (2007) Beef Forage Range Practices in South Florida. http://sfbfp.ifas.ufl.edu/files/pdf/BeefForageRangePractices_2007_survey.pdf. Accessed September 28, 2014Google Scholar
Fernandez, JV (2013) Characterization of Glyphosate Resistance and Management of Ragweed Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in the Everglades Agricultural Area of Florida. . Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. 62 pGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Mullahey, JJ, Langeland, KA, Kline, WN (2006) Control of tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum) with aminopyralid. Weed Technol 20:453–457 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Sellers, BA, Macdonald, GE (2012) Herbicidal control of largeleaf lantana (Lantana camara). Weed Technol 26:554–558 Google Scholar
Hart, C, Hartler, W, Warren, J (2011) Aerial Application of Aminocyclopyrachlor on Selected Brush Species. Texas AgriLife Extension Service. http://stephenville.tamu.edu/files/2011/02/Aerial-Lotebush-Pricklypear_Final.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2014Google Scholar
Kyser, GB, DiTomaso, JM (2013) Effect of timing on chemical control of dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) in California. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:362–370 Google Scholar
Leppla, NC, Frank, JH, Adjei, MB, Vicente, NE (2007) Management of pest mole crickets in Florida and Puerto Rico with a nematode and parasitic wasp. Fla Entomol 90:229–233 Google Scholar
MacDonald, GE, Brecke, BJ, Colvin, DL, Shilling, DG (1994) Chemical and mechanical control of dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium). Weed Technol 8:483–487 Google Scholar
Mann, RK, Brinkworth, LA, Langston, VB, Masters, RA, Peterson, VF, Fisher, ML, Ovalle, D, Posada, E, inventors (2014) April 3. Synergistic weed control from applications of aminocyclopyrachlor and triclopyr. U.S. patent 14/039,346Google Scholar
Mikkelson, JR, Lym, RG (2013) Effect of aminopyralid on desirable forb species. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:30–35 Google Scholar
Miller, AJ, Bork, EW, Hall, LM, Summers, B (2015) Long-term forage dynamics in pastures sprayed with residual broadleaf herbicide: a test of legume recovery. Can J Plant Sci 95:43–53 Google Scholar
Minogue, PJ, Enloe, SF, Osiecka, A, Lauer, DK (2011) Comparison of aminocyclopyrachlor to common herbicides for kudzu (Pueraria montana) management. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:419–426 Google Scholar
Murphy, TR (2011) Grass Pasture and Hay Field Herbicides. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension. www.caes.uga.edu/commodities/fieldcrops/forages/pests/pastweed11.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2014Google Scholar
Nelson, LS, Getsinger, KD, Luu, KT (1993) Effect of chemical treatments on bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) suppression. Weed Technol 7:127–133 Google Scholar
Ovalle, D, Garzon, NMC, Paniagua, L, Rojas-Calvo, CE, Masters, RA, inventors (2014) June 12. Synergistic weed control from applications of aminocyclopyrachlor and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). U.S. patent 14/098,747Google Scholar
Reddy, KN, Bryson, CT, Burke, IC (2007) Ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) control with preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 21:982–986 Google Scholar
Renz, MJ (2010) Establishment of forage grasses and legumes after fall herbicide applications. Forage and Grazinglands DOI: Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA (2004) Dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium): Biology and Control (SS-AGR-224). Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag233. Accessed July 1, 2014Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA (2013) Sometimes it's the less common weed. The Florida Cattleman and Livestock Journal 78:20–28 Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA (2014) Weed Management in Pastures and Rangeland—2014 (SS-AGR-08). Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/wg006. Accessed July 1, 2014Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Ferrell, JA, MacDonald, GE, Kline, WN (2009) Dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium) size at application affects herbicide efficacy. Weed Technol 23:247–250 Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Lancaster, SR (2014) Climatological report 2013. University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Range Cattle Research and Education Center Research Report (RC-2014-1). http://rcrec-ona.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/publications/wrcrec13.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2015Google Scholar
Shaner DL ed. (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 41–46 Google Scholar
Stamps, RH (2011) Identification, Impacts, and Control of Ragweed Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) (ENH1187). Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ep448. Accessed July 1, 2014Google Scholar
[USDA-ERS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–Economic Research Service (2012) Data Set: Grassland Pasture and Range, 1945–2007, by State. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/major-land-uses.aspx. Accessed November 12, 2012Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Stastitics Service (2013) Annual Statistical Bulletin from Florida Agriculture Statistical Directory. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Florida/Publications/Agriculture_Statistical_Directory/2013/2013%20FL%20Ag%20by%20the%20Numbers(FASD).pdf. Accessed April 16, 2014Google Scholar
Vendramini, J, Kalmbacher, RS, Ezenwa, IV (2013) Managing South Florida Range for Cattle (SS-AGR-105). Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag173. Accessed July 1, 2014Google Scholar
Wehtje, G, Reed, RB, Dute, RR (1985) Reproductive biology and herbicidal sensitivity of maypop passionflower (Passiflora incarnata). Weed Sci 33:484–490 Google Scholar