Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:54:22.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monitoring the Occurrence of Sulfonylurea-Resistant Prickly Lettuce (Lactuca serriola)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mauricio Alcocer-Ruthling
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Carol Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843

Abstract

Sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce was discovered in Idaho in 1987. The objectives of these surveys were to determine the change with time in the proportion of sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible prickly lettuce biotypes on the farm where it originally occurred, and to determine the spread of sulfonylurea resistant prickly lettuce beyond its point of origin. On average, the proportion of resistant plants had decreased from 1988 to 1990, a period when sulfonylurea herbicide use was discontinued on the farm. Resistant prickly lettuce plants were found at seven sites away from the original infested farm. Several sites were near the farm along roadsides that had been sprayed with sulfometuron. This study shows that the proportion of resistant prickly lettuce decreased where previously found, but its range increased.

Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alcocer-Ruthling, M., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1992. Differential competitiveness of sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6:303309.Google Scholar
2. Gressel, J., and Segel, L. A. 1990. Modelling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4:186198.Google Scholar
3. Hanf, M. 1983. The arable weeds of Europe with their seedlings and seeds. BASF. United Kingdom. 494 p.Google Scholar
4. Holm, L., Pancho, J., Herberger, J., and Plucknett, D. 1979. A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. Wiley-Interscience. New York.Google Scholar
5. Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1990. Identification and inheritance of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L). Dissertation. University of Idaho. 58 p.Google Scholar
6. Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4:163168.Google Scholar
7. Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., Dial, M. J., and Zemetra, R. S. 1990. Inheritance of sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in Lactuca spp. Weed Technol. 4:787790.Google Scholar
8. Prince, S. D., and Carter, R. D. 1985. The geographical distribution of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola) J. Ecol. 73:5964.Google Scholar
9. Ray, T. B. 1986. Sulfonylurea herbicides as inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Biochem. Sci. 11:180183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar