Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:02:44.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Control in Pinto Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with Imazethapyr Combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard N. Arnold
Affiliation:
New Mex. State Univ. Agric. Sci. Cent. at Farmington, Farmington, NM 87499
Martina W. Murray
Affiliation:
New Mex. State Univ. Agric. Sci. Cent. at Farmington, Farmington, NM 87499
Eddie J. Gregory
Affiliation:
New Mex. State Univ. Agric. Sci. Cent. at Farmington, Farmington, NM 87499
Dan Smeal
Affiliation:
New Mex. State Univ. Agric. Sci. Cent. at Farmington, Farmington, NM 87499

Abstract

Imazethapyr, alone and in combination with other herbicides, was applied PPI, PRE, and POST to pinto beans to determine weed control and selectivity to the crop. All of the herbicides improved pinto bean yield as compared with the unweeded control. Imazethapyr applied PPI and POST provided excellent control of black nightshade, kochia, Russian thistle, prostrate pigweed, and redroot pigweed. Barnyardgrass control with imazethapyr ranged from 58 to 96% and increased to 98% or greater when imazethapyr was combined with metolachlor, pendimethalin, trifluralin, or EPTC. Pinto bean yield was not reduced from any herbicide treatment compared to the handweeded control.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackshaw, R. E. and Esau, R. 1991. Control of broadleaf weeds in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 5:532538.Google Scholar
2. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206208.Google Scholar
3. Miller, S. D., Dalrymple, A. W., and Krall, J. M. 1990. Weed control in pinto beans with preplant incorporated or complimentary preplant incorporated/postemergence treatments. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Prog. Rep. p. 257258.Google Scholar
4. Ogg, A. G. and Rodgers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:2558.Google Scholar
5. Parker, C. and Fryer, J. D. 1975. Weed control problems causing major reductions in world food supplies. Food Agric. Organ. Plant Prot. Bull. 23:8395.Google Scholar
6. Renner, K. A. and Powell, G. E. 1988. Dry edible bean tolerance to postemergence herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 43:36.Google Scholar
7. Wilson, R. G. Jr., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1980. Weed control in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 28:295299.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, R. G. and Miller, S. D. 1991. Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed-crop competition. International Plant Protection Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. p. 7374.Google Scholar