Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:46:03.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Glyphosate, Diflubenzuron, and Boron Combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric P. Prostko ,
Jason K. Norsworthy  and
Paul A. Raymer
Eric P. Prostko
Affiliation:
Rural Development Center, University of Georgia, P.O. Box 1209, Tifton, GA 31793
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
277 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29817
Paul A. Raymer
Affiliation:
University of Georgia, Georgia Station, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in Georgia and South Carolina in 2000 and 2001 to evaluate the effects of glyphosate, diflubenzuron, and boron combinations on crop injury and soybean yield. No interactions among glyphosate, diflubenzuron, and boron were observed. Both glyphosate and boron caused significant foliar injury (chlorosis and leaf burn) ranging from 7 to 10% in one of three locations. Diflubenzuron did not cause significant soybean injury at any location. Soybean injury symptoms observed in these experiments were transient and did not negatively affect yield.

Keywords

Borondiflubenzuron, N-[[(4-chlorophenyl)amino]carbonyl]-2,6-difluorobenzamideglyphosatesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Hartz 7550RR’Compatibilitycrop toleranceglyphosate-resistant soybeanpesticide combinationstank-mixturestransgenic soybeanDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergence
Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 186 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. 1990. Enhancement of soybean (Glycine max) injury and weed control by thifensulfuron-insecticide mixtures. Weed Technol. 4: 524–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., and Beighley, D. H. et al. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35: 1461–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Stage of Soybean Development. Ames, IA: Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Special Rep. 80. 12 p.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. and McBride, W. D. 2000. Genetically Engineered Crops for Pest Management in US Agriculture: Farm Level Effects. Agriculture Economic Rep. #786 (AER-786). Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture: Web page: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications. Accessed: April 2000.Google Scholar
Haney, R. L., Senseman, S. A., Hons, F. M., and Zuberer, D. A. 2000. Effect of glyphosate on soil microbial activity and biomass. Weed Sci. 48: 89–93.Google Scholar
Harris, G. H. 2002. Fertilization and liming. In Georgia Soybean Production Guide. Department of Crop & Soil Science Publication CSS-02-05. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia. 62 p.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. R., Majek, B. A., and Prostko, E. P. 1999. Application of manganese fertilizer with postemergence soybean herbicides. J. Prod. Agric. 12: 445–448.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F. and Young, B. G. 2001. Response of glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) to trimethylsulfonium and isopropylamine salts of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 15: 745–749.Google Scholar
Martens, A. R., Burnside, O. C., and Cramer, G. L. 1978. Compatibility and phytotoxicity of herbicide-fertilizer combinations. Agron. J. 7: 1089–1098.Google Scholar
McPherson, R. M. and Gascho, G. J. 1999. Interactions of entomology: mid-season dimilin and boron treatment impact on the incidence of arthropod pests and yield enhancement of soybeans. J. Entomol. Sci. 34: 17–30.Google Scholar
Monaco, T. J., Weller, S. C., and Ashton, F. M. 2002. Borates. In Weed Science: Principles and Practices. 4th ed. New York: J. Wiley. pp. 374–375.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1991. Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 39: 622–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1993. Influence of diammonium sulfate and other salts on glyphosate activity. Pestic. Sci. 38: 77–84.Google Scholar
Piland, J. R., Ireland, C. F., and Reisenauer, H. M. 1944. The importance of borax in legume seed production in the south. Soil Sci. 57: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, K. W., Burnside, O. C., and Bucy, J. I. 1987. Herbicide compatibility and phytotoxicity when mixed with liquid fertilizers. Agron. J. 79: 48–52.Google Scholar
Schon, M. K. and Blevins, D. G. 1990. Foliar boron applications increase the final number of branches and pods on branches of field-grown soybeans. Plant Physiol. 92: 602–607.Google Scholar
Smeda, R. J. and Hoefer, J. A. 2001. Impact of glyphosate timing on weed control and soybean yield. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 41: 119.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Whiting, K. 2000. Weed control and economic comparisons of glyphosate-resistant, sulfonylurea-tolerant, and conventional soybean (Glycine max) systems. Weed Technol. 14: 204–211.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. K., Pendergrass, R., and Hayes, R. M. 1999. Economic analysis of alternative herbicide regimes on Roundup Ready soybeans. J. Prod. Agric. 12: 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. D., Jackson, E. P., and Penner, D. 1995. The basis for hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 43: 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touchton, J. T. and Boswell, F. C. 1975. Effects of B applications on soybean yield, chemical composition, and related characteristics. Agron. J. 67: 417–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2001a. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 2001 Field Crops Summary. Web page: http://www.usda.mannlib.cornell.edu. Accessed: May 2001.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2001b. Crop Production—Acreage: 2001 Field Crops Summary. Web page: http://www.usda.mannlib.cornell.edu. Accessed: June 29, 2001.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2001c. Crop Production—Annual Summary: 2001 Field Crops Summary. Web page: http://www.usda.mannlib.cornell.edu. Accessed: November 9, 2001.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 231–234.Google Scholar