Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:59:11.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Postemergence Herbicide Combinations for Long-Term Trumpetcreeper (Campsis radicans) Control in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kevin W. Bradley ,
Edward S. Hagood Jr.  and
Paul H. Davis
Kevin W. Bradley*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Edward S. Hagood Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
Paul H. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in Virginia during 2000 and 2001 to evaluate long-term trumpetcreeper control in corn with dicamba, BAS 654 plus dicamba, 2,4-D, CGA 152005 plus primisulfuron, halosulfuron, primisulfuron, and mesotrione. Each of these herbicides was applied alone as a single postemergence (POST) treatment or as a component of a POST herbicide combination. Trumpetcreeper suppression ratings 3 mo after treatment (MAT) revealed a general trend toward higher levels of suppression with combinations of dicamba, BAS 654 plus dicamba, or 2,4-D with any of the sulfonylurea herbicides and lower levels of suppression with applications of any of the sulfonylurea herbicides alone. Combinations of dicamba, BAS 654 plus dicamba, or 2,4-D with mesotrione also provided some of the highest levels of trumpetcreeper suppression 3 MAT in both years. At 1 yr after treatment (YAT), 2,4-D alone, BAS 654 plus dicamba, CGA 152005 plus primisulfuron plus 280 g ai/ha dicamba, primisulfuron plus 280 g/ha dicamba, primisulfuron plus 2,4-D, mesotrione plus BAS 654 plus dicamba, and mesotrione plus 2,4-D reduced trumpetcreeper stem density by at least 52% when compared with that of the nontreated control. These herbicide treatments were the only ones that provided reductions in trumpetcreeper stem density 1 YAT when compared with that of the nontreated control. In 2000 and 2001, there were few differences in corn yield among the treatments evaluated in these trials, and no treatment resulted in corn yields that were lower than the nontreated control. Acceptable trumpetcreeper suppression may be achieved during the season of treatment with any of these herbicide combinations, but only a few treatments will provide long-term trumpetcreeper control.

Keywords

BAS 654, 2-(1-[([3, 5-difluorophenylamino]carbonyl)-hydrazono]ethyl)-3-pyridine-carboxylic acid, proposed common name diflufenzopyrCGA 152005, 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3, 3, 3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl]-urea, proposed common name prosulfurondicamba2,4-D dimethylamine salthalosulfuronmesotrioneprimisulfurontrumpetcreeper, Campsis radicans (L.) Seem. ex Bureau #3 CMIRAcorn, Zea mays LGrowth regulator herbicidesno-tillherbicide combinationsperennial weed controlsulfonylurea herbicidesMAT, months after treatmentPOST, postemergenceYAT, years after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 718 - 723
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1970. Common Weeds of the United States. Washington, DC: Agriculture Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 463 p.Google Scholar
Bertin, R. I. 1982. Paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans). Am. Nat 119:694–709.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Sci 35:1247–1258.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Becker, R. L., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1994. Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci. 42:205–209.Google Scholar
Chachalis, D. and Reddy, K. N. 2000. Factors affecting Campsis radicans seed germination and seedling emergence. Weed Sci. 48:212–216.Google Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Technology Information Center. 2002. Web page: http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/CTIC/. Accessed: July 3, 2002.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S. and Oliver, L. R. 1980. Redvine and trumpetcreeper control in soybeans and grain sorghum. Ark. Farm Res 29:5.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Heatherly, L. G., and Wesley, R. A. 1989. Perennial vine control in multiple cropping systems on a clay soil. Weed Technol. 3:282–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fresenburg, B. S. 1984. Dicamba and 2,4-D in field corn. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf 39:85–86.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Pp. 213–236.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, D. S. H. 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res. 21:99–109.Google Scholar
Glenn, S., Phillips, W. H. II, and Kalnay, P. 1997. Long-term control of perennial broadleaf weeds and triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11:436–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, L., Tessier, S., and Dyck, F. B. 1991. Tillage and rotation influences on weed community composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in southwestern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci 71:783–789.Google Scholar
Prostko, E. P., Ingerson-Mahar, J., and Majek, B. A. 1994. Postemergence horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) control in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 8:441–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, C. V. and Kells, J. J. 1998. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) control in corn (Zea mays) with selective postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 12:631–637.Google Scholar
Roeth, F. W. and Moomaw, R. S. 1977. Dicamba and 2,4-D [2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid] injury to corn. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Control Conf 32:83.Google Scholar
Roeth, F. W., Moomaw, R. S., Burnside, O. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1979. Dicamba and 2,4-D injury to corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr 20:21.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1982. SAS User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 956 p.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Clements, D. R., and Derksen, D. A. 1993. Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Technol. 7:286–297.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. Jr., Slack, C. H., Augenstein, R. D., and Herron, J. W. 1973. Action and fate of 2,4-D and dicamba in trumpetcreeper. Weed Sci. 21:429–432.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. in Wiese, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453–457.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states grass crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:247–264.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—southern states broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 54:244–260.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P. T., Fry, A., Durgan, B. R., and Wyse, D. L. 1997. Establishment of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) in corn, soybean, and wheat. Weed Sci. 45:44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonce, M. H. and Skroch, W. A. 1989. Control of selected perennial weeds with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 37:360–364.Google Scholar