Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:50:54.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of soil moisture regimes on the growth and fecundity of slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridis) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Asad M. Khan Open the ORCID record for Asad M. Khan [Opens in a new window] ,
Ahmadreza Mobli Open the ORCID record for Ahmadreza Mobli [Opens in a new window] ,
Jeff A Werth  and
Bhagirath S. Chauhan Open the ORCID record for Bhagirath S. Chauhan [Opens in a new window]
Asad M. Khan*
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
Ahmadreza Mobli
Affiliation:
Former Ph.D Student, Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran; and Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
Jeff A Werth
Affiliation:
Senior Research Scientist, Leslie Research Centre, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Australia
Bhagirath S. Chauhan
Affiliation:
Professor, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) and School of Agriculture and Food Sciences (SAFS), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Asad M. Khan, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridis L.) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) are increasingly problematic weeds of summer crops in Australia. Water is considered the most limiting factor in an agroecosystem, and water stress adversely impacts the growth and reproduction of plant species. The primary objective of this study was to determine the growth and fecundity of two Australian biotypes (Goondiwindi and Gatton) of A. viridis and A. retroflexus under water-stress conditions. Four water-stress treatments (100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% field capacity [FC]) at a 4-d irrigation interval were chosen. No difference was observed for growth and seed production between the two biotypes of both species when grown under varying soil moisture regimes. At 100% FC, A. viridis produced 44 g plant−1 aboveground biomass and 1,740 seeds plant−1. The maximum growth (46 g plant−1) and seed production (3,070 seeds plant−1) of A. retroflexus were observed at 100% FC. The growth and seed production of both species were reduced with increased water-stress levels. Both weeds responded to water stress by decreasing the shoot:root biomass ratio. However, A. viridis (290 seeds plant−1) and A. retroflexus (370 seeds plant−1) were able to produce a significant number of seeds per plant even at 25% FC. Results suggest that both weeds will produce seeds under water-limiting conditions. Therefore, management strategies are required to minimize the growth and survival of weeds in water-deficit conditions.

Keywords

Drought adaptationshoot:root ratiowater deficitweed biomassweed seed production
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 82 - 87
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Chenxi Wu, Bayer U.S. – Crop Science

References

Ali, MA, Abbas, A, Niaz, S, Zulkiffal, M, Ali, S (2009) Morpho-physiological criteria for drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) at seedling and post-anthesis stages. Int J Agric Biol 11:674–680 Google Scholar
Anjum, SA, Wang, LC, Farooq, M, Hussain, M, Xue, LL, Zou, CM (2011) Brassinolide application improves the drought tolerance in maize through modulation of enzymatic antioxidants and leaf gas exchange. J Agron Crop Sci 197:177–185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, AA, Chauhan, BS, Adkins, S (2017) Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of two Australian biotypes of Parthenium hysterophorus to different soil moisture regimes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:16186–16194 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajwa, AA, Chauhan, BS, Adkins, SW (2018) Germination ecology of two Australian biotypes of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) relates to their invasiveness. Weed Sci 66:62–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensch, CN, Horak, MJ, Peterson, D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci 51:37–43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, SJPD, Christoffoleti, PJ (2008) Competition of Amaranthus species with dry bean plants. Sci Agr 65:239–245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2010) Growth and reproduction of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) in response to water stress. Weed Sci 58:132–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Mahajan, G, eds (2014) Recent Advances in Weed Management. 1st ed. New York: Springer. 411 p Google Scholar
Crusciol, CAC, Arf, O, Zucareli, C, Sá, ME, Nakagawa, J (2001) Production and physiological quality of upland rice seeds according to water availability. Rev Bras Sementes 23:287–293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehleringer, J (1983) Ecophysiology of Amaranthus palmeri, a Sonoran Desert summer annual. Oecologia 57:107–112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, Y, Xiong, L (2015) General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 72:673–689 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forseth, IN, Ehleringer, JR (1982) Ecophysiology of two solar tracking desert winter annuals. II. Leaf movements, water relations and microclimate. Oecologia 54:41–49 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gioria, M, Pyšek, P (2017) Early bird catches the worm: germination as a critical step in plant invasion. Biol Invasions 19:1055–1080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2020) International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. http://weedscience.org. Accessed: March 11, 2020Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP, eds (1977) The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. 1st ed. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press. 609 p Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 48:347–355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, S, Aulakh, J, Jhala, AJ (2016) Growth and seed production of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in response to water stress. Can J Plant Sci 96:828–836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, DW (2013) Genetic engineering to improve plant performance under drought: physiological evaluation of achievements, limitations, and possibilities. J Exp Bot 64:83–108 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahajan, G, Chauhan, BS, Kumar, V (2015) Integrated weed management in rice. Pages 125–153 in Chauhan BS, Mahajan G, eds. Recent Advances in Weed Management. New York: Springer Google Scholar
Mahajan, G, Mutti, NK, Walsh, M, Chauhan, BS (2019) Effect of varied soil moisture regimes on the growth and reproduction of two Australian biotypes of junglerice (Echinochloa colona). Weed Sci 67:552–559 Google Scholar
Mahajan, G, Singh, S, Chauhan, BS (2012) Impact of climate change on weeds in the rice-wheat cropping system. Curr Sci 102:1254–1255 Google Scholar
McLachlan, SM, Swanton, CJ (1993) Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci 41:568–573 Google Scholar
Mobli, A, Matloob, A, Chauhan, BS (2019) The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) to mungbean density. Weed Sci 67:642–648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JE, Franklin, SB (2011) Understanding the relative roles of disturbance and species interactions in shaping Mississippi River island plant communities. Community Ecol 12:108–116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, PJ, Showler, AT (2005) Plant responses to water deficit and shade stresses in pigweed and their influence on feeding and oviposition by the beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 34:929–937 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogburn, RM, Edwards, EJ (2010) The ecological water-use strategies of succulent plants. Pages 179–225 in Kader JC, Delseny M, eds. Advances in Botanical Research. Burlington, MA: Academic Press Google Scholar
Olufolaji, OA, Ojo, OD (2010) Effect of soil moisture stress on the emergence, establishment and productivity of amaranth. J Plant Nutr 33:613–625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, DT (1995) Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Sci 43:483–490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengasamy, P (2002) Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview. Aust J Exp Agric 42:351–361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, D, Irmak, S, Lindquist, JL, Knezevic, SZ, Jhala, AJ (2016) Effect of water stress on the growth and fecundity of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci 64:42–52 Google Scholar
Schwartz, LM, Norsworthy, JK, Young, BG, Bradley, KW, Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Steckel, LE, Walsh, MJ (2016) Tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seed production and retention at soybean maturity. Weed Technol 30:284–290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz-Lazaro, LM, Green, JK, Norsworthy, JK (2017) Seed retention of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in soybean. Weed Technol 31:617–622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slabbert, RM, Krüger, GH (2011) Assessment of changes in photosystem II structure and function as affected by water deficit in Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. and Amaranthus hybridus L. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:978–984 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoller, EW, Myers, RA (1989) Response of soybeans (Glycine max) and four broadleaf weeds to reduced irradiance. Weed Sci 37:570–574 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, DG, Simpson, GM (1978) Drought resistance of Sorghum bicolor. 1. Drought avoidance mechanisms related to leaf water status. Can J Plant Sci 58:213–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardieu, F (2013) Plant response to environmental conditions: assessing potential production, water demand, and negative effects of water deficit. Front Physiol 4:17 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uva, RH, Neal, JC, DiTomaso, JM, eds (1997) Weeds of the Northeast. 1st ed. New York: Cornell University Press. 397 p Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waselkov, KE, Olsen, KM (2014) Population genetics and origin of the native North American agricultural weed waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Am J Bot 101:1726–1736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar