Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:05:03.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rice farming components for biological weed control in transplanted rice: perspective on weedy rice management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2021

Ramanathan Kathiresan*
Affiliation:
Professor, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamilnadu, India
Sangeeviraman Vishnudevi
Affiliation:
Research Scholar, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamilnadu, India
*
Author for correspondence: Ramanathan Kathiresan, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Tamilnadu, India 608002. Email:[email protected]

Abstract

Farming elements other than the crop, when integrated into the system, are supplementary, with multifold uses that include weed and pest management. Elements such as fish and poultry birds are integrated with transplanted wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.) for ensuring farmers’ livelihoods and the nutritional security and sustainability of the system. Integrated animal components such as poultry birds and fish also supplement the system with weed control. The role and efficacy of these animal components as tools for managing weedy rice (Oryza sativa L.) were explored, as weedy rice infestation is increasing. This threat of weedy rice is due to scarcity of water resulting from poor water management and improper field leveling. Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella val.) produced the highest reduction of weedy rice biomass, 28% within 24 h under laboratory conditions. Polyculture of C. idella, mrigal (Cirrhinus mrigala Ham.), and silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix val.) reduced the biomass of weedy rice by 21% within 24 h. In laboratory studies, poultry manure at the highest concentration of 5% reduced the weedy rice seed germination 100% compared with rice seed germination at 91%. This conformed with microplot experiments in which poultry manure at 15.6 g d−1 resulted in a weed control index (WCI) of 8% in both years. However, poultry manure at 15.6 g d−1 in combination with herbicide application resulted in the highest control indices of weedy rice: 52% in 2017 and 2018. Integrating fish and poultry with PRE application of oxyfluorfen (0.25 kg ha−1) resulted in the highest WCI and grain yield in field experiments.

Type
Special Issue Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Nilda Roma-Burgos, University of Arkansas

References

Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare (2019) Annual Report 2018–19. http://agricoop.nic.in. Accessed: June 15, 2020Google Scholar
Department of Economics and Statistics (2017) Home page. https://www.tn.gov.in/detail_contact/4195/4. Accessed: June 15, 2020Google Scholar
Ferreira, MT (1991) Use of fish to control aquatic weeds. Situation in Europe and Portugal. Revista-de-Ciencias-Agrarias 14:7389 Google Scholar
Govindan, R (1988) Role of Poultry-cum-Fish Culture on the Economics of Farming Systems in Thanjavur District of Cauvery Delta. MSc (Ag) dissertation. Tamilnadu, India: Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore. 160 pGoogle Scholar
Jayaraman, R, Varadarajan, S (1996) Optimisation of farm income in integrated fish-poultry-crop farming system. Agric Econ Rev 9:6471 Google Scholar
Kathiresan, R, Sangeeviraman, V, Chandrahasan, P, Chaudhary, BN, Ramachandra, SS (2020) Integration of fish culture and poultry rearing in transplanted rice for nutritional security in smallholder farms. Scientific Reports 10:1038 Google Scholar
Kathiresan, RM (2007) Integration of elements of farming system for sustainable weed and pest management in the tropics. Crop Prot 26:424429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathiresan, RM (2009) Integrated farm management for linking environment. Indian J Agron 54:914 Google Scholar
Misra, A, Tosh, GC (1979) Chemical weed control studies on dwarf wheat. Journal of Research, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology 10:16 Google Scholar
Mitre, A, Ghosh, BC, Jana, MK, Mittra, BN (1992) Growing of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) in integrated rice-cum-fish farming system in eastern India. Aquaculture 23:162163 Google Scholar
Nie, D, Yinghong, C, Jianguo, W (1992) Mutualism on rice and fish in rice fields, Manila, Philippines. ICLARM (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management) Newsletter 24:173175 Google Scholar
Panse, VG, Sukhatme, PV (1978) Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research Publication. Pp 8789 Google Scholar
Rekha Ghosh, BC, Ghosh, A, Mitra, MK, Jana, Mitra BN (1994) Techniques of rice-cum-fish culture for increasing productivity in lowlands. Indian Farming 44: 2326 Google Scholar
Rothuis, AJ, Vromant, N, Xuan, VT, Richter, CJJ, Ollevier, F (1991) The effect of rice seeding rate on rice and fish production and weed abundance in direct seeded rice-fish culture. Aquaculture 172:255274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, N, Rao, VK (1996) Poultry byproducts and their utilization. Indian Farming 39:1518 Google Scholar
[TNAU] Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (2012) Crop Production Guide. Chennai, India: Department of Agriculture, Government of Tamil Nadu; Tamilnadu, India: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/pdf/2013/CPG%202012.pdf. Accessed: March 20, 2021Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, M (1979) Control of aquatic weeds by grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Jpn Agric Res Q 13:200203 Google Scholar
Wong, MH, Cheung, YH, Cheung, CL (1983) The effects of ammonia and ethylene oxide in animal manure and sewage sludge on the seed germination and root elongation of Brassica parachinensis . Environ Pollut A 30:109123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, SY, Wu, WS, Wei, HF, Ke, D, Xu, JR, Wu, QI (1989) Field tests of rice paddy pest control with fish culture. Chinese J Biol Control 5:113116 Google Scholar