Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:51:40.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence of Picloram Activity in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. H. Keys  and
H. A. Friesen
C. H. Keys
Affiliation:
Experimental Farm, Canada Agriculture, Scott, Saskatchewan
H. A. Friesen
Affiliation:
Soils and Crop Section, Research Station, Canada Agriculture, Lacombe, Alberta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The persistence of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) in soil was measured after varying periods of time up to 3 years with bioassay technique using sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L., var. Advent) as the indicator plant. Rates of application ranged from 0.5 to 48 oz/A on two soil types at Scott, Saskatchewan and two at Lacombe, Alberta. After 1 year, recovery ranged from 20 to 30% of the original application in the 0 to 9-inch depth in each soil not disturbed by tillage directly after application. Recovery of the herbicide applied at rates of 8 oz/A or higher in the fall declined to about 10% after 24 months and to 6% or less after 35 months for even the highest rates. Picloram activity generally was concentrated in the surface 6 inches, indicating limited downward movement due to water in each of the soils. However, there was a tendency toward greater downward movement in the soils having lower organic matter content.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , July 1968 , pp. 341 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Friesen, G. 1965. Wild buckwheat control with Tordon. Down to Earth 20(4):9–10.Google Scholar
2. Goring, C. A. I., Youngson, C. R., and Hamaker, J. W. 1965. Tordon herbicide—disappearance from soils. Down to Earth 20(4):3–5.Google Scholar
3. Grover, T. 1966. Studies on the degradation of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid in soil. Weed Res. 7:61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hamaker, J. E., Johnston, H., Martin, R. T., and Redemann, C. T. 1963. A picolinic acid derivative: A plant growth regulator. Science 141:363.Google Scholar
5. Herr, D. E., Stroube, E. W., and Ray, D. A. 1966. The movement and persistence of picloram in soil. Weeds 14:248–250.Google Scholar
6. Leasure, J. K. 1964. Bioassay methods for 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid. Weeds 12:232–233.Google Scholar
7. Molberg, E. S. 1965. Experiments with Tordon for weed control in flax. Down to Earth 20(4): 11–12.Google Scholar
8. Saha, J. G. and Gadallah, L. A. 1966. Determination of the herbicide Tordon (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) in soil by electron capture gas chromatography. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 50:637–641.Google Scholar
9. Vanden Born, W. H. and Schrsa, R. J. 1966. Control of Cirsium arvense and yields of grain on picloram-treated plots after three years. Res. Rep., Natl. Weed Comm. of Can., West. Sec. p. 239–240.Google Scholar
10. Warden, R. L. 1964. Tordon for the control of field bindweed and Canada Thistle in the North Central United States. Down to Earth 20(2):6–10.Google Scholar