Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T06:12:52.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adsorption and Efficacy of Trifluralin and Butralin as Influenced by Soil Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. John Peter  and
Jerome B. Weber
C. John Peter
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE 19898
Jerome B. Weber
Affiliation:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Wilmington, DE 19898
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Significantly higher rates of butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] were required to produce the same level of weed control as trifluralin [2,6-dinitro -N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) benzenamine] when applied to soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] on seven different soils in the field. Higher rates of butralin were also required to control barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ♯ ECHCG] in growth chamber studies. No differences in the extent of soil adsorption of trifluralin and butralin were apparent; therefore, differences in efficacy could not be attributed to differences in soil adsorption. Herbicide rates required for 80% weed control and Freundlich K-values (adsorption capacity indices) were mostly highly correlated with soil organic-matter content and soil surface area as measured by benzyl ethyl ether (BEE) and ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (EGME) on nine soils. Analysis of the organic-matter content of the nine soils by 10 soil testing laboratories resulted in highly significant differences among laboratories.

Keywords

Dinitroaniline herbicidesorganic-matter contentsoil surface areaGlycine maxEchinochloa crus-galliECHCG
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , November 1985 , pp. 861 - 867
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, L. E. 1965. Organic carbon. Pages 1367–1378 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis (Part 2). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
2. Anderson, W., Richards, A. B., and Whitworth, J. W. 1968. Leaching of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin in soil columns. Weed Sci. 16:165–169.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1983. Reference Soil Test Methods for the Southern Region of the United States. Southern Coop. Series Bull. 289. Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA. 40 pp.Google Scholar
4. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Childers, V. O. 1967. Trifluralin behavior in soil. I. Toxicity and persistence. Agron. J. 59:159–160.Google Scholar
5. Brunauer, S., Emmet, P. H., and Teller, E. 1938. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60:309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Carringer, R. D., Weber, J. B., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Adsorption-desorption of selected pesticides by organic matter and montmorillonite. J. Agric. Food Chem. 23:568–572.Google Scholar
7. Carter, D. L., Heilman, M. D., and Gonzales, C. L. 1965. Ethylene glycol monoethyl ether for determining surface area of silicate minerals. Soil Sci. 21:308–309.Google Scholar
8. Day, P. R. 1965. Particle and fractionation and particle-size analysis. Pages 545–566 in Black, C. A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis (Part I). Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
9. Duseja, D. R. and Holmes, E. E. 1978. Field persistence and movement of trifluralin in two soil types. Soil Sci. 125:1041–1048.Google Scholar
10. Harrison, G. W. and Weber, J. B. 1975. Comparative phytotoxicities of five herbicides in ten North Carolina soils. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:283–291.Google Scholar
11. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Field comparison of twelve dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:512–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Relative phytotoxicites of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Harvey, R. G. 1974. Soil adsorption and volatility of dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 22:120–124.Google Scholar
14. Helling, C. S. 1976. Chemical and physical properties of the dinitroaniline herbicides. Suppl. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 30:44–50.Google Scholar
15. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Hill, G. D., McGaben, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–103.Google Scholar
17. Hollist, R. L. and Foy, C. L. 1975. Trifluralin interactions with soil constituents. Weed Sci. 19:11–16.Google Scholar
18. Jacques, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1979. Adsorption and diffusion of dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. Weed Sci. 27:450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Jordan, T. N., Baker, R. S., and Barrentine, W. L. 1978. Comparative toxicity of several dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 26:72–75.Google Scholar
20. Koren, E. 1972. Leaching of trifluralin and oryzalin in soil with three surfactants. Weed Sci. 20:230–232.Google Scholar
21. Lambert, S. M. 1967. Functional relationship between sorption in soil and chemical structure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:572–576.Google Scholar
22. Leopold, A. C., van Scaik, P., and Neal, M. 1960. Molecular structure and herbicide absorption. Weeds 8:48–54.Google Scholar
23. Menges, R. M. and Tamex, S. 1975. Movement and persistence of bensulide and trifluralin in irrigated soil. Weed Sci. 22:67–71.Google Scholar
24. Parochetti, J. V., Dec, G. W. Jr., and Burt, G. W. 1975. Volatility of eleven dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:529–532.Google Scholar
25. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of metribuzin as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:868–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Peter, C. J. and Weber, J. B. 1985. Adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of alachlor and metolachlor as influenced by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:874–881.Google Scholar
27. Sheets, T. J. 1958. The comparative toxicities of four phenylurea herbicides in several soil types. Weeds 6:413–24.Google Scholar
28. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10: 9–13.Google Scholar
29. Weber, J. B. 1978. History, comparative properties and behavior of trifluralin and other dinitroaniline herbicides. Pages 132–139 in Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Nat. Cotton Counc., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
30. Weber, J. B. and Peter, C. J. 1982. Adsorption, bioactivity and evaluation of soil tests for alachlor, acetochlor, and metolachlor. Weed Sci. 30:14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Weber, J. B., Coble, H. D., Monaco, T. J., Worsham, A. D., Mehlich, A., Hatfield, A., Eaddy, D. W., and Peter, C. J. 1981. Soil test and herbicide rate recommendations for metolachlor and alachlor in agronomic and horticultural crops. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 24:265–273.Google Scholar
32. Weed, S. B. and Weber, J. B. 1974. Pesticide-organic matter interactions. Pages 39–66 in Guenzi, W. D., ed. Pesticides in Soil and Water, Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar