Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T03:35:11.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Repeatability indices for the Farnsworth D-15 test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2005

JEFFERY K. HOVIS
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
SHANKARAN RAMASWAMY
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
MATTHEW ANDERSON
Affiliation:
School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

The repeatability of the D-15 color-vision test is considered to be excellent. However, this conclusion is based on a subject pool which contained a large percentage of color-normals. This type of sampling could bias the repeatability results because color-normals rarely fail the test. Furthermore, color-normals usually do not perform the D-15 in the clinical setting. To establish the repeatability of the D-15 for a relevant clinical population, we examined the D-15 results from two different sessions for 116 subjects who had a congenital red–green color-vision defect. The kappa coefficient for intersession agreement indicated that approximately 84% of the subjects obtained the same pass/fail results at both sessions. The type of defect was repeatable on approximately 80% of the subjects. Although the repeatability of the D-15 for color-defective subjects was good, it was lower than the near-perfect agreement reported previously. The coefficients of repeatability for the crossings show that if a person makes less than five crossings then the test should be administered again in order to ensure that the test result is repeatable.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atchison, D.A., Bowman, K.J., & Vingrys, A.J. (1991). Quantitative scoring methods for D15 panel tests in the diagnosis of congenital color vision deficiencies. Optometry & Vision Science 68, 4148.Google Scholar
Birch, J. (1997). Clinical use of the City University Test (2nd Edition). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 17, 466472.Google Scholar
Bland, J.M. & Altman, D.G. (1986). Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet, Feb. 8, 1(8476), 307310.Google Scholar
Commission Internationale de l'Elclairage. (2001). International Recommendations for Colour Vision Requirements for Transport. Vienna, Commission Internationale de l'Elclairage.
Dain, S.J. & Adams, A.J. (1990). Comparison of the standard and Adams desaturated D-15 tests with congenital colour vision deficiencies. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 10, 4045.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, D. (1947). The Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color Blindness Panel D-15. New York: The Psychological Corp.
Higgins, K.E. & Knoblauch, K. (1977). Validity of Pinckers' 100-Hue version of the panel D-15. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 54, 165170.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, K., Fischer, M., Robillard, N., Grunwald, I.S., & Faye, E. (1991). The effect of test size on performance of the D-15 in age-related maculopathy and congenital color deficiency. In Color Vision Deficiencies X, ed. Drum, B., Moreland, J. & Serra, A., pp. 3745. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Oliphant, D. & Hovis, J.K. (1998). Comparison of the D-15 and City University (2nd Edition) color vision tests. Vision Research 38, 34613465.Google Scholar
Pokorny, J., Smith, V.C., Verriest, G., & Pinckers, A.J.L.G. (1979). Congenital and Acquired Color Vision Defects. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Vingrys, A.J. & King-Smith, P.E. (1988). A quantitative scoring technique for panel tests of color vision. Investigative Ophthalmology and Vision Science 29, 5063.Google Scholar