Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T12:32:16.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proceedings of the Joint Discussion: Masses of the Principal Planets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2021

G. M. Clemence

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Chairman, W. Fricke, President of Commission 4, opened the Joint Discussion by drawing attention to the purpose and proposed procedure for the meeting. The Joint Discussion had been arranged by the Executive Committee of the Union in order to avoid the necessity for separate discussions by each Commission that was affected by the Report of the Working Group on the IAU System of Astronomical Constants. The Organizing Committee therefore proposed the following resolution:

‘The members of the IAU at this Joint Discussion recommend to the Executive Committee that the following resolution be put before the General Assembly: “The International Astronomical Union endorses the final list of constants prepared by the Working Group on the System of Astronomical Constants and recommends that it be used in the national and international astronomical ephemerides at the earliest practicable date.’”

Type
Part 4 Joint Discussions
Information
Transactions of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , 1966 , pp. 609 - 614
Copyright
Copyright © Academic Press 1966 

References

Anderson, J. D., Null, G. W., Thornton, C. T. Celestial Mechanics and Astrodynamics, Progress in Aeronautics and Astronautics Series, Academic Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
Biesbroeck, G. van, Astr.J., 62, 272, 1957.Google Scholar
Bosch, G. A. van den De Massa's van de Groote Planeten (dissertation, University of Utrecht), 1927.Google Scholar
Brouwer, D. Bull, astr., 15, Fasc. 3, 1950.Google Scholar
Brouwer, D. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc, 115, 221, 1955.Google Scholar
Brouwer, D., Clemence, G. M. Planets and Satellites, University of Chicago Press, p. 65, 1961.Google Scholar
Clemenc, G. M. Astr. Pap. Amer. Eph., 11, Part 1, 1943.Google Scholar
Clemence, G. M. Astr. J., 65, 21, 1960.Google Scholar
Clemence, G. M. Planets and Satellites, University of Chicago Press, p. 61, 1961.Google Scholar
de Sitter, W. Ann. Cape Obs., 12, Part 1, 1915.Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L. Astr. Pap. Amer. Eph., 16, Part 1, 1958.Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L., Clemence, G. M. Astr.J., 63, 456, 1958.Google Scholar
Duncombe, R. L. Private communication, 1963.Google Scholar
Eckert, W. J., Brouwer, D., Clemence, G. M. Astr. Pap. Amer. Eph., 12, 1951.Google Scholar
Gaillot, M. A. Ann. Obs. de Paris, 31, 1913.Google Scholar
Gaillot, M. A. Ann. Obs. de Paris, 28, A1, 1910.Google Scholar
Harris, D. Dissertation, University of Chicago, Unpublished, 1950.Google Scholar
Hertz, H. G. Astr. Pap. Amer. Eph., 15, Part 2, 1953.Google Scholar
Hill, G. W. Astr. Pap. Amer. Eph., 7, 1898.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc, 114, 433, 1954.Google Scholar
Jones, H. Spencer Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc, 86, 426, 1926.Google Scholar
Jones, H. Spencer Mem. R. astr. Soc, 66, Part 2, 1941.Google Scholar
Kulikov, D. K. Bjull. Inst. teor. Astr. (Leningrad), 4, 311, 1950.Google Scholar
Kulikov, D. K. Bull, astr., 25, 139, 1965.Google Scholar
Makover, S. G., Bokhan, N. A. Trud. Inst. teor. Astr. (Leningrad), 8, 135, 1961.Google Scholar
Marsden, B. G. Bull, astr., 25, 225, 1965.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. R., Scott, F. P. Astr. J, 47, 193, 1939.Google Scholar
Osten, H. Astr. Nachr., 232, no. 557, 1928.Google Scholar
Rabe, E. Astr.J., 55, 112, 1950.Google Scholar
Samter, H. Astr. Abh. z. A. N., 3, no. 17, 1910.Google Scholar
Witt, G. Viertelj. Astr. Gesel. 43 Jhrg., 1933.Google Scholar